Skip to main content

Social networks and industrial geography

  • Conference paper

Abstract

In many industries, production resides in a small number of highly concentrated regions; for example, several high tech industries cluster in Silicon Valley. Explanations for this phenomenon have focused on how the co-location of firms in an industry might increase the efficiency of production. In contrast, this article argues that industries cluster because entrepreneurs find it difficult to access the information and resources they require when they reside far from the sources of these valuable inputs. Since existing firms often represent the largest pools of these important factors, the current geographic distribution of production places important constraints on entrepreneurial activity. As a result, new foundings tend to arise in the same areas as existing ones, and hence reproduce the industrial geography. In support of this thesis, the article reviews empirical evidence from the shoe manufacturing and biotechnology industries.

Keywords

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Akerlof GA (1970) The market for ‘lemons’: qualitative uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics 84: 488–500

    ISI  Google Scholar 

  • Allen TJ (1977) Managing the flow of technology. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow KJ (1962) The economic implications of learning by doing. Review of Economic Studies 29: 155–173

    ISI  Google Scholar 

  • Baker W (1984) The social structure of a national securities market. American Journal of Sociology 89: 775–811

    CrossRef  ISI  Google Scholar 

  • Blau PM (1977) Inequality and heterogeneity. Free Press, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Bossard JS (1932) Residential propinquity as a factor in marriage selection. American Journal of Sociology 38: 219–224

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Brittain JW, Freeman J (1986) Entrepreneurship in the semiconductor industry. Mimeo

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman JS (1990) Foundations of social theory. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman JS, Katz E, Menzel H (1966) Medical innovation: a diffusion study. Bobbs-Merrill, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Coval J, Moskowitz TJ (2001) The geography of investment: informed trading and asset prices. Journal of Political Economy 109: 811–841

    CrossRef  ISI  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond C, Simon C (1990) Industrial specialization and increasing returns to labor. Journal of Labor Economics 8: 175–201

    CrossRef  ISI  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger L, Schacter S, Back KW (1950) Social pressures in informal groups. Harper, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox CR, Tversky A (1995) Ambiguity aversion and comparative ignorance. Quarterly Journal of Economics 110: 585–603

    ISI  Google Scholar 

  • Fried VH, Hisrich RD (1994) Toward a model of venture capital investment decision making. Financial Management 23: 28–37

    ISI  Google Scholar 

  • Garmaise MJ, Moskowitz TJ (2003) Confronting information asymmetries: evidence from real estate markets. Revew of Financial Studies: forthcoming

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter MS (1973) The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 78: 1360–1380

    CrossRef  ISI  Google Scholar 

  • Klepper S, Sleeper S (2000) Entry by spinoffs. Mimeo

    Google Scholar 

  • Klepper S (2001) Employee startups in high-tech industries. Industrial and Corporate Change 10: 639–674

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kono C, Palmer D, Friedland R, Zafonte M (1998) Lost in space: the geography of corporate interlocking directorates. American Journal of Sociology 103: 863–911

    CrossRef  ISI  Google Scholar 

  • Latour B (1989) Science in action. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarsfeld PF, Merton RK (1954) Friendship as a social process: a substantive and methodological analysis. In: Berger M, Abel T, Page CH (eds) Freedom and control in modern society. Van Nostrand, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Løvâs B, Sorenson O (2003) Social capital, competition and resource mobilization. Mimeo

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsden PV (1989) Homogeneity in confiding relations. Social Networks 10: 57–76

    ISI  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall A (1890) Principles of economics. MacMillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM (2001) Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology 27: 415–444

    CrossRef  ISI  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson RR (1959) The simple economics of basic scientific research. Journal of Political Economy 67: 297–306

    ISI  Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME (1990) he competitive advantage of nations. Free Press, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Raehse SL, Sharkley MF (1991) Footwear. Fairchild Fashion and Merchandising Group, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers EM (1995) Diffusion of innovations. Free Press, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer P (1987) Growth based on increasing returns to specialization. American Economic Review 77: 56–62

    ISI  Google Scholar 

  • Rotemberg JJ, Saloner G (1990) Competition and human capital accumulation: a theory of interregional specialization and trade. Mimeo

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter JA (1942) Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Harper, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorenson O, Audia PG (2000) The social structure of entrepreneurial activity: geographic concentration of footwear production in the United States, 1940–1989. American Journal of Sociology 106: 424–462

    CrossRef  ISI  Google Scholar 

  • Sorenson O, Stuart TE (2001) Syndication networks and the spatial distribution of venture capital investments. American Journal of Sociology 106: 1546–1588

    CrossRef  ISI  Google Scholar 

  • Stouffer SA (1940) Intervening opportunities: a theory relating mobility and distance. American Sociological Review 5: 845–867

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart TE, Sorenson O (2003) The geography of opportunity: spatial heterogeneity in founding rates and the performance of biotechnology firms. Research Policy 32: 229–253

    CrossRef  ISI  Google Scholar 

  • Szenberg M, Lombardi JW, Lee EY (1977) Welfare effects of trade restrictions: a case study of the U.S. footwear industry. Academic Press, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • von Thünen JH (1826). Der isolierte staat in beziehung auf landtschaft und nationalokonomie. G Fischer, Jena

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber A (1909). Ueber den standort der industrien. J Verlag, Tübingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Zipf GK (1949) Human behavior and the principle of least effort. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sorenson, O. (2005). Social networks and industrial geography. In: Cantner, U., Dinopoulos, E., Lanzillotti, R.F. (eds) Entrepreneurships, the New Economy and Public Policy. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26994-0_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics