Advertisement

Investigations of Granularity and Payoffs in 2×2 Games under Replicator Dynamics

  • Sofia Chajadine
  • Daniel Mack
  • Aaron Jeffrey Slan
Part of the International Handbooks on Information Systems book series (INFOSYS)

Abstract

This paper describes an investigation of several 2×2 games in iterated form. Players play the games repeatedly and are limited to mixed strategies, with particular actions chosen probabilistically. The games investigated include Prisoner’s Dilemma, Chicken, and Stag Hunt in various forms. The reward structure and the granularity of the games—number of games played per generation in the replicator dynamics—are the main factors investigated, with surprising results.

Keywords

Successful Strategy Stochastic Game Replicator Dynamic Total Domination Stag Hunt Game 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [Axe84]
    Robert Axelrod, The evolution of cooperation, Basic Books, Inc., New York, NY, 1984.Google Scholar
  2. [Daw89]
    Richard Dawkins, The selfish gene, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, 1989.Google Scholar
  3. [GMS98]
    Patrick Grim, Gary Mar, and Paul St. Denis, The philosophical computer: Exploratory essays in philosophical computer modeling, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1998.Google Scholar
  4. [Hum78]
    David Hume, A treatise of human nature, Oxford: Clarendon, Oxford, UK, [1739] 1978, Selby-Bigge, ed.Google Scholar
  5. [LR57]
    R. Duncan Luce and Howard Raiffa, Games and decisions, John Wiley, New York, NY, 1957, Reprinted by Dover Books, 1989.Google Scholar
  6. [NS92]
    M. Nowak and K. Sigmund, Tit-for-tat in heterogeneous populations, Nature 355 (1992), 250–2.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. [NS93]
    —, A strategy of win-stay lose-shift that outperforms tit-for-tat in the prisoner’s dilemma game, Nature 364 (1993), 56–8.CrossRefADSPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. [Sky96]
    Brian Skyrms, Evolution of the social contract, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1996.Google Scholar
  9. [Sky01]
    —, The stag hunt, World Wide Web, 2001, Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association. http://www.lps.uci.edu/home/fac-staff/faculty/skyrms/StagHunt.pdf. Accessed September 2004.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sofia Chajadine
    • 1
  • Daniel Mack
    • 2
  • Aaron Jeffrey Slan
    • 3
  1. 1.University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA
  3. 3.University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations