Skip to main content

Maintenance

  • Chapter
  • 1304 Accesses

Abstract

Recall sessions should follow a standardized plan so that nothing is overlooked. All findings are communicated to the patient. Important findings and those findings requiring the cooperation or some activity on the part of the patients can be documented in writing. The guideline followed could be the Check-up Report (Form A11), a copy of which is included with the patient’s dental records, while the original is handed to the patient.

Keywords

  • Maxillary Sinus
  • Oral Hygiene
  • Treatment Provider
  • Occlusal Surface
  • Resin Cement

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We currently use Dynagraft. The only indication restriction, in our experience, is the use of Dynagraft in the region of the widely opened (including membrane) maxillary sinus, especially in connection with the explantation of infected BOI implants or with secondary augmentation near BOI when superinfection of the disk areas is suspected.

  2. 2.

    Hildegard Knef once summarized this in a song: “What? You are feeling well?! We must be able to do something about that.” Or, speaking with Christian Morgenstern and his Palmström’s law: “What must not be cannot be” (from The Impossible Fact, Gallow Songs, 1963)

  3. 3.

    In Switzerland, universities are usually well protected against such lawsuits claiming incorrect medical advice, since cantonal law stipulates a statue of limitations of only two years, sometimes even with the requirement that the lawsuit has to be decided before that time limit expires. By the time the patient realizes that it was the university that misinformed and mistreated him, rather than the BOI dentist against whom the original lawsuit was brought, 2 years may very well have passed, meaning that the statute of limitation in favour of the university dental clinic would apply.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ihde, S. (2005). Maintenance. In: Principles of BOI. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26987-8_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26987-8_26

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-21665-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-26987-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics