Contrast-Medium Administration

  • Dominik Fleischmann
Part of the Medical Radiology book series (MEDRAD)


Compute Tomography Angiography Arterial Enhancement Injection Protocol Injection Duration Test Bolus 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Bae KT, Heiken JP, Brink JA (1998) Aortic and hepatic contrast medium enhancement at CT. I. Prediction with a computer model. Radiology 207:647–655PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bae KT, Heiken JP, Brink JA (1998) Aortic and hepatic contrast medium enhancement at CT. II. Effect of reduced cardiac output in a porcine model. Radiology 207:657–662PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bae KT, Tran HQ, Heiken JP (2000) Multiphasic injection method for uniform prolonged vascular enhancement at CT angiography: pharmacokinetic analysis and experimental porcine model. Radiology 216:872–880PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bellin MF, Jakobsen JA, Tomassin I, Thomsen HS, Morcos SK (2002) Contrast medium extravasation injury: guidelines for prevention and management. Eur Radiol 12:2807–2812CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Birnbaum BA, Nelson RC, Chezmar JL, Glick SN (1999) Extravasation detection accessory: clinical evaluation in 500 patients. Radiology 212:431–438PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dawson P (1998) Does injection rate affect the tolerance? In: Dawson PH, Clauss W (eds) Contrast media in practice: questions and answers. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 135–136Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dawson P, Blomley MJ (1996) Contrast agent pharmacokinetics revisited. I. Reformulation. Acad Radiol [Suppl 2] 3:261–263Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dawson P, Blomley MJ (1996) Contrast media as extracellular fluid space markers: adaptation of the central volume theorem. Br J Radiol 69:717–722PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fleischmann D (2002) Present and future trends in multiple detector-row CT applications: CT angiography. Eur Radiol 12:11–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fleischmann D, Hittmair K (1999) Mathematical analysis of arterial enhancement and optimization of bolus geometry for CT angiography using the discrete fourier transform. J Comput Assist Tomogr 23:474–484CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fleischmann D, Rubin GD, Bankier AA, Hittmair K (2000) Improved uniformity of aortic enhancement with customized contrast medium injection protocols at CT angiography. Radiology 214:363–371PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Haage P, Schmitz-Rode T, Hubner D, Piroth W, Gunther RW (2000) Reduction of contrast material dose and artifacts by a saline flush using a double power injector in helical CT of the thorax. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174:1049–1053PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hittmair K, Fleischmann D (2001) Accuracy of predicting and controlling time-dependent aortic enhancement from a test bolus injection. J Comput Assist Tomogr 25:287–294CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hopper KD (1996) With helical CT, is nonionic contrast a better choice than ionic contrast for rapid and large IV bolus injections? AJR Am J Roentgenol 166:715PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hopper KD, Mosher TJ, Kasales CJ, et al. (1997) Thoracic spiral CT: delivery of contrast material pushed with injectable saline solution in a power injector. Radiology 205:269–271PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jacobs JE, Birnbaum BA, Langlotz CP (1998) Contrast media reactions and extravasation: relationship to intravenous injection rates. Radiology 209:411–416PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Katayama H, Yamaguchi K, Kozuka T, et al. (1990) Adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic CM. A report from the Japanese Committee on the Safety of Contrast Media. Radiology 175:621–628PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nelson RC, Anderson FA Jr, Birnbaum BA, Chezmar JL, Glick SN (1998) Contrast media extravasation during dynamic CT: detection with an extravasation detection accessory. Radiology 209:837–843PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rubin GD, Lane MJ, Bloch DA, Leung AN, Stark P (1996) Optimization of thoracic spiral CT: effects of iodinated contrast medium concentration. Radiology 201:785–791PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sheiman RG, Raptopoulos V, Caruso P, Vrachliotis T, Pearlman J (1996) Comparison of tailored and empirical scan delays for CT angiography of the abdomen. AJR Am J Roentgenol 167:725–729PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Van Hoe L, Marchal G, Baert AL, Gryspeerdt S, Mertens L (1995) Determination of scan delay-time in spiral CT-angiography: utility of a test bolus injection. J Comput Assist Tomogr 19:216–220PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dominik Fleischmann
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Radiology, Thoracic and Cardiovascular Imaging SectionsStanford University Medical CenterStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations