We introduce several efficiency notions depending on what kind of expected utility is used (ex ante, interim, ex post) and on how agents share their private information, i.e., whether they redistribute their initial endowments based on their own private information, or common knowledge information, or pooled information. Moreover, we introduce several Bayesian incentive compatibility notions and identify several efficiency concepts which maintain (coalitional) Bayesian incentive compatibility.
Private Information Banach Lattice Grand Coalition Incentive Compatibility Information Economy
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access
Cartwright, D.: The Order Completeness of Some Spaces of Vector Valued Functions. Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society 11, 57–61 (1974)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diestel, J., J. J. Uhl: Vector Measures, Mathematical Surveys, No. 15. Providence: American Mathematical Society 1977Google Scholar
Hahn, G., Nicholas C. Yannelis: Coalitional Bayesian Nash Implementation in Differential Information Economies. Working Paper, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (1995)Google Scholar
Holmström, B., R. Myerson: Efficient and Durable Decision Rules with Incomplete Information. Econometrica 51, 1799–1819 (1983)Google Scholar
Kobayashi, T.: Equilibrium Contracts for Syndicates with Differential Information, Econometrica 48, 1635–1665 (1980)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
Koutsougeras, L., N. C. Yannelis: Incentive Compatibility and Information Superiority of the Core of an Economy with Differential Information. Economic Theory 3, 195–216 (1993)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
Krasa, S., N. C. Yannelis: The Value Allocation of an Economy with Differential Information Econometrica 62, 881–900 (1994)Google Scholar