Pan-European Approach

The Role of Business in Society in Europe
  • Gilbert Lenssen
  • Volodja Vorobey


Corporate Social Responsibility Corporate Governance Social Contract Stakeholder Theory Power Distance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Agle, B. R., Mitchell, R.K., & Sonnenfeld, J. A. 1999. What matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 507–525.Google Scholar
  2. Albert, M. 1991. Capitalisme contre capitalisme. Paris: Editions du Seuil.Google Scholar
  3. Chatman, J. A., & Jehn, K. A. 1994. Assessing the relationship between industry characteristics and organizational culture: How different can you be? Academy of Management Journal, 37: 522–553.Google Scholar
  4. Clarkson, M. B. E. 1995. A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20: 92–117.Google Scholar
  5. De Jong, H. W. 1989. The takeover market in Europe: control structures and the performance of large companies compared. Review of Industrial Organization, 6: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. De Jong, H. W. 1996. Rijnlandse ondernemingen presteren beter. ESB: 228–232.Google Scholar
  7. Donaldson, T., & Dunfee, T.W. 1999. Ties That Bind. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  8. Franks, J. R., & Mayer, C. 1990. Capital markets and corporate control: A study of France, Germany, and the UK. Economic Policy, 10: 191–231.Google Scholar
  9. Freeman, R. E. 1984. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach, Boston: Pitman Publishing.Google Scholar
  10. Fombrun C., & Foss, C. 2001. The Reputation Quotient. The Gauge, May., accessed 20.05.2004.Google Scholar
  11. Fombrun, C., Gardberg, N., & Barnett, M. L. 2000. Opportunity platforms and safety nets: Corporate citizenship and reputational risk. Business and Society Review, 105(1): 85–106., accessed 20.05.2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gelauff, G. M. M., & Den Broder, C. 1996. Governance of stakeholder relationships; the German and Dutch experience. The Hague: Centraal Plan Bureau.Google Scholar
  13. Gray, R., Owen, D., & Adams, C. 1996. Accounting and Accountability. London: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  14. Harris International. 2004. Guide to the Annual Reputation Quotient Methodology. New York.Google Scholar
  15. Hofstede, G. 1984. Cultural Dimension in Management and Planning. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, January: 81–99.Google Scholar
  16. Hofstede, G. 1991. Cultures and Organisation: Software of the Mind. London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  17. ICMG (International Capital Markets Group). 1995. International corporate governance: Who holds the terms? London: ICMG.Google Scholar
  18. Katz, J., Swanson, D., & Nelson, L. 1999. Culture Based expectations of Corporate Citizenship., accessed 20.05.2004.Google Scholar
  19. Kowalczyk, S. J., & Pawlish, M. J. 2002. Corporate Branding through External Perception of Organizational Culture. Corporate Reputation Review, 5(2–3): 159–174.Google Scholar
  20. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. 1997. Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22: 853–886.Google Scholar
  21. Moerland, P. W. 1995a. Alternative disciplinary mechanisms in different corporate systems. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 26: 17–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Moerland, P. W. 1995b. Corporate ownership and control structures: An international comparison. Review of Industrial Organization, 10: 443–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. O’Reilly, C., Chatman, J., & Caldwell, D. 1991. People and organizational culture: A Q-sort approach to assessing person-organization. Academy of Management Journal, 34: 487–516.Google Scholar
  24. Sacconi, L. 2004. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) as a model of “extended” corporate governance. An explanation based on the economic theories of social contract, reputation and reciprocal conformism. Liuc Papers, No. 142. Serie Etica, Diritto ed Economia 10.Google Scholar
  25. Segal, J.-P. 2004. Pluralité des lectures politiques de la responsabilité sociale de l’entreprise en Europe. Unpublished paper. ENPC, CNRS, Gestion et Société.Google Scholar
  26. Suchman, M. C. 1995. Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20: 571–610.Google Scholar
  27. Trompenaars, F. 1997. Riding the Waves of Culture. London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  28. Van den Berghe L., & De Ridder, L. 1999. International Standardisation of Good Corporate Governance, Best Practices for the Board of Directors. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  29. Van den Berghe, L. 2002. Corporate Governance in a Globalising World: Convergence or Divergence? A European Perspective. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  30. Weimer, L., & Pape, J. C. 1999. A Taxonomy of Systems of Corporate Governance. Corporate Governance, 7(2): 152–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Berlin · Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gilbert Lenssen
  • Volodja Vorobey

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations