Pan-European Approach

A Conceptual Framework for Understanding CSR
  • Dirk Matten
  • Jeremy Moon


Corporate Social Responsibility Business Ethic Social Responsibility Corporate Social Responsibility Activity Corporate Social Performance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Albert, M. 1991. Capitalisme contre capitalisme. Paris: LeSeuil.Google Scholar
  2. Beck, U. 1997. Subpolitics, ecology and the disintegration of institutional power. Organization & Environment, 10(1): 52–65.Google Scholar
  3. Bendell, J. (Ed.). 2000. Terms for endearment: business, NGOs and sustainable development. Sheffield: Greenleaf.Google Scholar
  4. Carroll, A. B. 1979. A three dimensional model of corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 4: 497–505.Google Scholar
  5. Carroll, A. B. 1991. The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons (Jul–Aug): 39–48.Google Scholar
  6. Carroll, A. B. 1999. Corporate social responsibility — evolution of a definitional construct. Business & Society, 38(3): 268–295.Google Scholar
  7. Child, J. 2000. Theorizing about organizations cross-nationally. In: J. L. C. Cheng, & R. B. Peterson (Eds.), Advances in international comparative management, Vol. 13: 27–75. Stamford, CN: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  8. Choi, C., Hilton, B., & Millar, C. 2004. Emergent Globalization. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  9. Commission of the European Communities. 2001. Green Paper: Promoting a European framework for corporate social responsibility. Brussels: EU Commission.Google Scholar
  10. Commission of the European Communities. 2002. Communication from the Commission concerning corporate social responsibility: A business contribution to sustainable development. Brussels: EU Commission.Google Scholar
  11. Crane, A., & Matten, D. 2004a. Business ethics — A European perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Crane, A., & Matten, D. 2004b. Questioning the domain of the business ethics curriculum. Journal of Business Ethics, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  13. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. 1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48:147–160.Google Scholar
  14. Fernandez Young, A., Moon, J., & Young, R. 2003. The UK Corporate Social Responsibility consultancy industry: a phenomenological approach. Nottingham: Research Paper Series of the International Centre for Corporate Social Responsibility, No 14.Google Scholar
  15. Friedman, M. 1970. The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine, 13. Sept. 1970.Google Scholar
  16. Fukukawa, K., & Moon, J. 2004. A Japanese Model of Corporate Social Responsibility?: A study of website reporting. Journal of Business Ethics: forthcoming.Google Scholar
  17. Geppert, M., Matten, D., & Williams, K. (Eds.). 2002. Challenges for European Management in a Global Context — Experiences from Britain and Germany. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  18. Hoffman, A. J. 2001. From heresy to dogma: an institutional history of corporate environmentalism (Expanded ed.). Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Hoffman, A. J., & Ventresca, M. J. 2002. Organizations, policy and the natural environment: institutional and strategic perspectives. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Hollingsworth, J. R., & Boyer, R. 1997. Coordination of economic actors and social systems of production. In: J. R. Hollingsworth, & R. Boyer (Eds.), Contemporary capitalism: the embeddedness of institutions: 1–47. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Jespersen, K. 2003. Social Partnerships: The Role of Government in Denmark. In: M. Morsing, & C. Thyssen (Eds.), Corporate Values and Responsibility: The Case of Denmark. Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur.Google Scholar
  22. Lane, C. 1989. Management and labour in Europe. The industrial enterprise in Germany, Britain and France. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  23. Lane, C. 1992. European business systems: Britain and Germany compared. In: R. Whitley (Ed.), European business systems: 64–97. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Lane, C. 1994. Industrial order and the transformation of industrial relations: Britain, Germany and France. In: R. Hyman, & A. Ferner (Eds.), New frontiers in European industrial relations: 167–195. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  25. Levidov, L., & Carr, S. 2000. Precautionary regulation: GM crops in the European Union. Journal of Risk Research, Special Issue, 3(3): 187–295.Google Scholar
  26. Levy, D., & Egan, D. 2000. Corporate politics and climate change. In: R. A. Higgott, G. R. D. Underhill, & A. Bieler (Eds.), Non-state actors and authority in the global system: 138–153. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Levy, D. L., & Kolk, A. 2002. Strategic Responses to Global Climate Change: Conflicting Pressures on Multinationals in the Oil Industry. Business and Politics, 3(2): 275–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lofstedt, R. E., & Vogel, D. 2001. The changing character of regulation: A comparison of Europe and the United States. Risk Analysis, 21(3): 399–405.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Maignan, I., Ralston, D. A. 2002. Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe and the U.S.: Insights from Businesses’ Self-presentations. In: Journal of International Business Studies, 33(3): 497–515.Google Scholar
  30. Matten, D. 2004. The impact of the risk society thesis on environmental politics and management in a globalizing economy — principles, proficiency, perspectives. Journal of Risk Research, 7(4): forthcoming.Google Scholar
  31. Matten, D., & Moon, J. 2004. Corporate Social Responsibility Education in Europe. Journal of Business Ethics: 377–398.Google Scholar
  32. Maurice, M., & Sorge, A. (Eds.). 2000. Embedding Organizations: Societal analysis of actors, organizations and socio-economic context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  33. Maurice, M., Sorge, A., & Warner, M. 1980. Societal differences in organizing manufacturing units: A comparison of France, West Germany and Great Britain. Organization Studies, 1(1): 59–86.Google Scholar
  34. Mayer, M., & Whittington, R. 2002. The evolving European corporation: strategy, structure and social science. In: M. Geppert, D. Matten, & K. Williams (Eds.), Challenges for European management in a global context: 19–41. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  35. McGrath, C. 2002. Comparative lobbying practices: Washington, London, Brussels. Paper presented at the Political Studies Association annual conference, University of Aberdeen.Google Scholar
  36. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. 2001. Corporate social responsibility: a theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1): 117–127.Google Scholar
  37. Meyer, J. W. 2000. Globalization — Sources and Effects on National States and Societies. International Sociology, 15: 233–248.Google Scholar
  38. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. 1977. Institutionalized organizations. American Journal of Sociology, 83: 340–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Moon, J. 2004a. CSR in the UK: an explicit model of business — society relations. In: A. Habisch, J. Jonker, M. Wegner, & R. Schmidpeter (Eds.), CSR across Europe: 51–65. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  40. Moon, J. 2004b. Government as a Driver of Corporate Social Responsibility. The UK in Comparative Perspective. Nottingham: Research Paper Series of the International Centre for Corporate Social Responsibility, No. 19.Google Scholar
  41. Orts, E. W., & Deketelaere, K. (Eds.). 2001. Environmental Contracts. Dordrecht et al.: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  42. Palazzo, B. 2002. U.S.-American and German business ethics: an intercultural comparison. Journal of Business Ethics, 41: 195–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sorge, A. 1991. Strategic fit and societal effect — interpreting cross-national comparisons of technology, organization and human resources. Organization Studies, 12(2): 161–190.Google Scholar
  44. Sorge, A., & Warner, M. 1986. Comparative factory organisation. An Anglo-German comparison of management and manpower manufacturing. Aldershot: Gower.Google Scholar
  45. Strebel, H. 1980. Umwelt und Betriebswirtschaft. Berlin: Erich Schmidt.Google Scholar
  46. Tempel, A., & Walgenbach, P. 2005. Global standardization of organisational forms and management practices? Combining American and European institutionalism. Journal of Management Studies, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  47. Vogel, D. 1986. National Styles of Regulation: Environmental Policy in Great Britain and the United States. Ithaca NY, London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Whitley, R. (Ed.). 1992. European business systems. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  49. Whitley, R. 1997. Business systems. In: A. Sorge, & M. Warner (Eds.), The IEBM handbook of organizational behaviour: 173–186. London: International Thomson Business Press.Google Scholar
  50. Whitley, R. 1999. Divergent capitalisms. The social structuring and change of business systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Whitley, R. 2002a. Business Systems. In: A. Sorge (Ed.), Organization: 178–212. London: Thomson Learning.Google Scholar
  52. Whitley, R. (Ed.). 2002b. Competing Capitalisms: Institutions and Economies. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  53. Whitley, R., & Kristensen, P. H. (Eds.). 1996. The changing European firm. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  54. Whitley, R., & Kristensen, P. H. (Eds.). 1997. Governance at Work. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Wolff, M. 2002. Response to “Confronting the Critics”. New Academy Review, 1(1): 230–237.Google Scholar
  56. Wynne, B., & Dressel, K. 2001. Cultures of uncertainty — transboundary risks and BSE in Europe. In: J. Linneroth-Bayer, R. Löfstedt, & G. Sjöstedt (Eds.), Transboundary risk management: 121–154. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Berlin · Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dirk Matten
  • Jeremy Moon

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations