Advertisement

Turkey

Social Responsibility in a State-Dependent Business System
  • Melsa Ararat

Keywords

Corporate Social Responsibility Social Responsibility Corporate Governance Corporate Social Performance Power Distance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adler, N. J., & Boyacigiller, N. 1995. Going beyond traditional HRM scholarship. In: R. N. Kanunga (Ed.), New approaches to employee management, Vol. 3. Employee management in developing countries: 1–13. Greenwich, CT: JAI press.Google Scholar
  2. Abdalla, I., & Al Homoud, M. 2001. Exploring the Implicit Leadership Theory in the Arabian Gulf States. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 50(4): 506–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ararat, M., & Ugur, M. 2003. Corporate Governance in Turkey: An Overview and Some Policy Recommendations. Corporate Governance, International Journal of Business in Society, 3(1): 58–75.Google Scholar
  4. Ascigil, S. 2004. TESEV research on CSR, unpublished.Google Scholar
  5. Aupperle, K. E. 1984. An empirical measure of corporate social orientation. Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, 6: 27–54.Google Scholar
  6. Bugra A. 1994. State and business in modern Turkey: A comparative study. New York, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  7. Caroll, A. B. 1979. A three dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 28(2): 446–443.Google Scholar
  8. Dilber, M. 1967. Management in the Turkish Private Sector Industry. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University Microfilms Inc.Google Scholar
  9. Fikret-Pasa, S., Kabasakal, H., & Bodur, M. 2001. Society, Organisations, and Leadership in Turkey. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 50(4): 559–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Harrington, J. E. 1989. If Homo Oeconomicus Could Choose His Own Utility Function, Would He want One with a Conscience? Comment. The American Economic Review, 79: 588–593.Google Scholar
  11. Hofstede, G. 1980. Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Hofstede, G. 1983. The Cultural relativity of organisational practices and theories. Journal of International Business Studies, 14(2): 75–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. House, R., Wright, N. S., Aditya R. N. 1997. Cross-cultural research on organisational leadership. A critical analysis and a proposal theory. In: P. C. Early, & M. Erz (Eds.), New Perspectives on international industrial/organizational psychology. San Francisco, CA: Lexington Press.Google Scholar
  14. Kabasakal, H., & Bodur, M. 1998. Leadership, values and Institutions: The Case of Turkey. Research Paper. Bogazici University, Istanbul.Google Scholar
  15. Kabasakal, H., & Dalmachian, A. 2001. Introduction to the Special Issues on Leadership and Culture in the Middle East. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 50(4):479–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McKinsey Global Institute. 2003. Türkiye, Verimlilik ve Büyüme Atılımının Gerçekleştirilmesi. Istanbul: McKinsey and Company.Google Scholar
  17. Ozen, R. 1998. Mentoring, gender and ideological perspectives: A case study. Doctoral dissertation. Bogazici University, Istanbul.Google Scholar
  18. PriceWaterhouseCoopers. 2001. Opacity Index. http://www.opacityindex.com, accessed 05.08.2004.Google Scholar
  19. Schwartz, S. H. 1994. Cultural Dimensions of Values: Towards and understanding national differences. In: U. Kim, H. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S.-C. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism, Theoretical and methodological issues: 85–119. Thousand Oaks, CS: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. Thomsen S. 2001. Business Ethics as Corporate Governance. European Journal of Law and Economics, 11(2): 153–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Transparency International. 2001. Corruption Perceptions Index Report 2001. Paris. http://www.transparency.org/cpi, accessed 05.08.2004.Google Scholar
  22. Transparency International. 2002. Corruption Perceptions Index Report 2002. Paris. http://www.transparency.org/cpi, accessed 05.08.2004.Google Scholar
  23. Ugur, M. 1999. The European Union and Turkey: An Anchor/Credibility Dilemma. Aldereshot: Ashgate Publishers.Google Scholar
  24. UNCTAD. 2001. World Investment Report 2001. New York & Geneva: UN Publications.Google Scholar
  25. Whitley, R. 1994. Dominant forms of economic organisation in market economies. Organization Studies, 15(2): 153–182.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Berlin · Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Melsa Ararat

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations