Nature for People: The Importance of Green Spaces to Communities in the East Midlands of England

  • Simon Bell


Green Space Disable People Forestry Commission English Nature Focus Group Research 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bauman A, Russell S, Furber S, Dobson A(2001) The epidemiology of dog walking: an unmet need for human and canine health. The Medical Journal of Australia, 175:632–636Google Scholar
  2. Bell S, Ward Thompson C, Travlou P (2003) Contested views of freedom and control: children, teenagers and urban fringe woodlands in central Scotland. Urban Forestry and Urban greening 2:87–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell S, Morris N, Findlay C, Travlou P, Gooch D, Gregory G, Ward Thompson C (2004) Nature for people: the importance of green spaces to East Midlands Communities. English Nature Research report 567, English Nature, PeterboroughGoogle Scholar
  4. Borg I, Shye S (1995) Facet Theory; Form & Content. Sage Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Burgess J (1995) Growing in Confidence: a study of perceptions of risk in urban fringe woodlands', Technical report CCP 457, Countryside Commission (former),Cheltenham,, last visited 20/10/03Google Scholar
  6. Canter D (1977) The Psychology of Place. Architectural Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Chesters A (1997) 'Who's been left out'.In: Blamey E (ed) Making Access for All a Reality. Proceedings, Countryside Recreation Network, Cardiff University: 32–36Google Scholar
  8. Countryside Agency, English Heritage and Sports England (2003) The use of Parks,, last visited 20/10/03Google Scholar
  9. Groundwork Blackburn and Manchester Metropolitan University (1999) Involving Black and Minority Ethnic Communities. Groundwork Blackburn and Manchester Metropolitan UniversityGoogle Scholar
  10. Kaplan S (1995) The Restorative Benefits of Nature: Toward an Integrative Framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology 15:169–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kelly G (1955) Principles of Personal Construct Psychology. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Læssøe J, Iversen T (2003) Naturen i et hverdagslivs-perspektiv: En kvalitativ interview-undersøgelse af forskellige danskeres forhold til naturen. Faglig rapport fra DMU, nr. 437Google Scholar
  13. Madge C (1997) Public parks and the geography of fear. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 88(3):237–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Michaud A (1993) Agir pour une ville sans peur. Guide d'enquête sur la sécurité des femmes en ville, City of Montreal, Department of Leisure, Parks and Community Development. From: VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN IN URBAN AREAS, An analysis of the problem from a gender perspective Soraya Smaoun United Nations Centre for Human Settlements, Urb Management Programme Safer Cities Programme Women and Habitat Programme, Nairobi, October 1999, last visited 16/10/03Google Scholar
  15. Moffat AJ (1997) Recycling land for forestry. Forestry Commission Technical paper 22. Forestry commission, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  16. Parsons R, Tassinary LG, Ulrich RS, Hebl MR, Grossman-Alexander M (1998) The View from the Road: Implications for Stress Recovery and Immunization. Journal of Environmental Psychology 18:113–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Slee B, Curry N, Joseph D (2001) Social Exclusion in the Countryside Leisure in the United Kingdom: The Role of the Countryside in Addressing Social Inclusion. A Report for The Countryside Recreation Network. The Countryside Recreation NetworkGoogle Scholar
  18. Sheets VL, Manzer CD (1991) Affect, Cognition, and Urban Vegetation: Some Effects of Adding Trees Along City Streets. Environment and Behavior 23(3):285–305Google Scholar
  19. Shye S (ed) (1978) Theory Construction and Data Analysis in the Behavoiral Sciences Jossey-Bass Publishers, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  20. Shye S, Elizur D, Hoffman M, (1994) Introduction to Facet Theory; Content Design and Intrinsic Data Analysis in Behavioral Research Sage Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
  21. Tidy Britain Group (1999) Dog fouling and the law. Published by DEFRA. Page published 1 June 1999, last modified 4 April, 2003, visited 20/10/03, Scholar
  22. Travlou P (2003) People and Public open Space in Edinburgh City Centre: Aspects of Exclusion. Presented at the 38th International Making Cities Liveable Conference, Carmel, California 19–23 OctoberGoogle Scholar
  23. Ulrich RS (1981) 'Natural versus urban scenes: some psycho-physiological effects'. Environment and Behaviour 13:523–556Google Scholar
  24. Ulrich RS (1993) Biophilia, Biophobia, and Natural Landscapes. In: Kellert S, Wilson EO (eds) The Biophilia Hypothesis. Shearwater/Island Press, Washington DC, pp 74–137Google Scholar
  25. Ulrich RS, Simons RF, Losito BD, Fiorito E, Miles MA, Zelson M (1991) Stress Recovery During Exposure to Natural and Urban Environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology 11:201–230. From: The Calming Effect of Green: Roadside Landscape and Driver Stress, fact sheet no 8, University of Washington, College of Forest Resources, Human Dimensions of the Urban Forest, last visited 20/10/03CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ward Thompson C, Aspinall P, Bell S, Findlay C (2002) Local open space and social inclusion: case studies of use and abuse of woodlands in Central Scotland. Edinburgh: OPENspace research centre report to Forestry Commission.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Simon Bell
    • 1
  1. 1.OPENspace Research CentreEdinburgh College of ArtEdinburgh

Personalised recommendations