Advertisement

New Perspectives for Urban Forests: Introducing Wild Woodlands

  • Cecil C. Konijnendijk

Keywords

Green Space Urban Resident Urban Forest Human Interference Community Forestry 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bell S, Blom D, Rautamäki M, Castel Branco C, Simson A, Olsen IA (in press) The design of the urban forest. In: Nilsson K Randrup TB Konijnendijk CC (eds) Urban forests and trees in Europe. Springer Academic, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  2. Blumenthal R (2003) Gun-toting sea lions and other park tales. New York Times, Sunday, 1 June 2003:5Google Scholar
  3. Braun B (1998) Walderholung im Spiegel der Sozialwissenschaften. Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt 117:44–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brender T, Carey H (1998) Community forestry defined. Journal of Forestry 96(3):21–23Google Scholar
  5. Burgess J (1995) 'Growing in confidence’ — Understanding people's perceptions of urban fringe woodlands. Technical Report. Countryside Commission, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  6. Duvigneaud P (1974) La synthèse écologique: populations, communautés, écosystèmes, biosphère, noosphère. Doin, ParisGoogle Scholar
  7. European Commission (1999) Sustainable urban development in the European Union: A framework for Action. COM(98) 605. Commission of the European Communities, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  8. Goode DA (1995) Het ontwerpen van natuur in stadsparken (Designing nature in urban parks) (in Dutch). Groenkontakt 21(4):44–48Google Scholar
  9. Helms JA (1998) The dictionary of forestry. Society of American Foresters, BethesdaGoogle Scholar
  10. INRA (1979) La forêt et la ville: essai sur la forêt dans l'environnement urban et industriel. Institut Nationalde Recherche Agronomique, Station de recherches sur la fôret et l'environnement, VersaillesGoogle Scholar
  11. Jacsman J (1998) Konsequenzen der intensiven Erholungsnutzung für die Wälder im städtischen Raum. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Forstwesen 149(6):423–439Google Scholar
  12. Jensen FS (2000) The effects of information on forest visitors' acceptance of various management actions. Forestry 73(2):175–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Johnston M (1996) A brief history of urban forestry in the United States. Arboricultural Journal 20:257–278Google Scholar
  14. Kaplan R, Kaplan S (1989) The experience of nature. Cambridge Univ. Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  15. Kilvington M, Wilkinson R (1999) Community attitudes to vegetation in the urban environment: a Christchurch case study. Landscape Research Science Series No. 22. Manaaki Whenua Press, LincolnGoogle Scholar
  16. Kong L, Yuen B, Sodhi N, Briffet C (1999) The construction and experience of nature: perspectives from urban youths. Tijdschrift voor Economie en Sociale Geografie 90(1):3–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Konijnendijk CC (1995) Het Mastbos heeft zijn vrienden gevonden: conflict over te voeren beheer lijkt ten einde (The Mastbos has found its friends: conflict over envisaged management seems to have ended) (in Dutch). Nederlands Bosbouwtijdschrift 67(2):61–67Google Scholar
  18. Konijnendijk CC (1999) Urban forestry in Europe: A comparative study of concepts, policies and planning for forest conservation, management and development in and around major European Cities. Ph.D. Thesis, Research Notes No. 90. Faculty of Forestry, University of JoensuuGoogle Scholar
  19. Konijnendijk CC (2003) A decade of urban forestry in Europe. Forest Policy and Economics 5(3):173–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kowarik I (2005) Wild urban woodlands: Towards a conceptual framework. In: Kowarik I, Körner S (eds) Urban Wild Woodlands. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 1–32Google Scholar
  21. Kuo FE (2003) The role of arboriculture in a healthy social ecology. Journal of Arboriculture 29(3):148–155Google Scholar
  22. Lawrence HW (1993) The Neoclassical origins of modern urban forests. Forest and Conservation History 37(1):26–36Google Scholar
  23. Lindhagen A, Hörnsten L (2000) Forest recreation in 1977 and 1997 in Sweden: changes in public preferences and behaviour. Forestry 73(2):143–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mehls H-H, Krischer V (1996) Die Erholungslandschaft ‘Grosser Deister’ — Eine Befragung der Waldbesucher zur Erholungsleistung. Forst und Holz 51(5):142–144Google Scholar
  25. Merriam-Webster (2003). Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary, www.m-w.com. Accessed on 22 December 2003Google Scholar
  26. Miller RW (1997) Urban forestry: planning and managing urban green spaces, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJGoogle Scholar
  27. Nas R (1998) Gedrag, beleving en wensen van de Nederlander ten aanzien van het bos (Behaviour, perception and wishes of the Dutchman regarding forest) (in Dutch). Nederlands Bosbouwtijdschrift 70: 247–250Google Scholar
  28. Nibbering C, Van Geel (1993) Zucht naar de kathedraal: beleving en beheer in de Haarlemmerhout (Longing for the cathedral: perception and management in the Haarlemmerhout) (in Dutch). Groen 49(12):26–31Google Scholar
  29. NUFU (1999) Trees and woods in towns and cities. How to develop local strategies for urban forestry. National Urban Forestry Unit, WolverhamptonGoogle Scholar
  30. Otto HJ (1998) Stadtnähe Wälder — kann die Forstwirtschaft sich noch verständlich machen? Forst und Holz 53(1):19–22Google Scholar
  31. Peterken G (1995) Natural woodland: Ecology and conservation in northern temperate regions. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  32. Proshansky HH, Fabian AK, Kaminoff R (1983) Place-identity: Physical world socialization of the self. Journal of Environmental Psychology 3(1):57–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rackham O (1990) Trees and woodland in the British landscape: the complete history of Britain's trees, woods and hedgerows, revised edition. Phoenix Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  34. Raintree JB (1991) Socioeconomic attributes of trees and tree planting practices. FAO (with ICRAF), RomeGoogle Scholar
  35. Roovers P, Hermy M, Gulinck H (2002) Visitor profile, perceptions and expectations in forests from a gradient of increasing urbanisation in central Belgium. Landscape and Urban Planning 59:129–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rydberg D (2001) Skogens sociale varden (The forest's social value) (in Swedish). Rapport 8j 2001. Skogsstyrelsen, JönköpingGoogle Scholar
  37. Senatsverwaltung für Stadtentwicklung und Umweltschutz Berlin (1991) Vom Kulturwald zum Naturwald: Landschaftspflegekonzept Grunewald. Arbeitsmaterialen der Berliner Forsten 1, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  38. Sukopp H, Werner P (1987) Development of flora and fauna in urban areas. Council of Europe, StrasbourgGoogle Scholar
  39. Van den Berg AE, De Vries S (2000) Het binnenstedelijke buitengevoel (The innercity outdoor feeling) (in Dutch). Levende Natuur 101:182–185Google Scholar
  40. Volk H (1995) Wald und Erholung im Wertewandel. Beiträge zur Forstwirtschaft und Landschaftsökologie 29(3):126–133Google Scholar
  41. Wiggers R, Gadet J (1996) Het grote groenonderzoek: Het bezoek aan en gebruik van parken, recreatiegebieden en groen in de woonomgeving in Amsterdam (The big green study: Visiting and use of parks, recreation areas and green in the living environment in Amsterdam) (in Dutch). Stedelijk Beheer, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  42. Wolterbeek T (1999) Bewoners vaak positief over ecologisch beheer (Residents often positive about ecological management) (in Dutch). Tuin & Landschap 21(1999):58–59Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cecil C. Konijnendijk
    • 1
  1. 1.Danish Centre for Forest, Landscape and PlanningDenmark

Personalised recommendations