Spatial Equilibrium and Disequilibruim: Locational Conflict and the Input-Ouput Model


Transportation Cost User Equilibrium Marginal Revenue Household Sector Spatial Equilibrium 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ansari, A.; Economides, N.; Ghosh, A. (1992). "Competitive positioning in markets with non-uniform preferences." Working paper, Stern School of Business, New York University, New York, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Aoyagi, M.; Okabe, A. (1993). "Spatial competition of firms in a two-dimensional bounded market." Regional Science and Urban Economics, Vol. 23, pp. 259–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Apte, U. M. (1999). "Decision model for planning of regional industrial programs." IIE Transactions, Vol. 31, pp. 881–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andersson, A. E.; Kuenne, R. E. (1986). "Regional Economic Dynamics." in Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, Vol. I (P. Nijkamp — Editor), Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam, Netherlands.Google Scholar
  5. Barondes, C; Chan, Y. (1991). "User vs system optimization of network flow: Multicriteria decision-making." Working paper, Department of Operational Sciences, Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio.Google Scholar
  6. Beckmann, M. J. (1987). "The economic activity equilibrium approach in location theory." in Urban Systems: Contemporary Approaches to Modelling, (C. S. Bertuglia, G. Leonardi, S. Occelli, G. A. Rabino, R. Tadei, and A. G. Wilson — editors), Croom Helm, Beckenham, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
  7. Bhadury, J. (1993). "Competitive location under uncertainty." Working paper 92-029, Faculty of Administration, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada.Google Scholar
  8. Bhadury, J. (1995). "Competitive location and entry deterrence: a variant of Hotelling's duopoly model." Working paper, Faculty of Administration, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada.Google Scholar
  9. Bhadury, J.; Eiselt, H. A. (1995). "Stability of Nash equilibria in locational games." RAIRO/Recherche Operationelle, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 19–33.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Billups, S. C.; Murty, K. G. (2000). “Complementarity problems.” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 124, pp. 303–318.CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Boyce, D. E.; Lundquist, L. (1987). "Network equilibrium models of urban location and travel choices: alternative formulations for the Stockholm region." Papers of the Regional Science Association, Vol. 61, pp. 93–104.Google Scholar
  12. Boyce, D.; Mattsson, L.-G. (1999). "Modeling residential location choice in relation to housing location and road tolls on congested urban highway Networks." Transportation Research B, Vol. 33, pp. 581–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brandeau, M. L.; Chiu, S. S. (1994). "Location of competing facilities in a user-optimizing environment with market externalities." Transportation Science, Vol. 28, pp. 125–140.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Catoni, S.; Pallotino, S. (1991). "Traffic equilibrium paradoxes." Transportation Science, vol 25, No 3.Google Scholar
  15. Chan, Y. (2000). Location Theory and Decision Analysis Thomson/South-Western, Cincinnati, Ohio.Google Scholar
  16. Chang, L.; Ziliaskopoulos, A.; Boyce, D.; Waller, S. T. (2001). “Solution algorithm for combined interregional commodity flow and transportation network model with link capacity constraints.” Transportation Research Record, No. 1771, pp. 114–123.Google Scholar
  17. Chiang, Y. S.; Roberts, P. O.; Ben-Akiva, M. (1980). "Development of a Policy Sensitive Model for Forecasting Freight Demand." Center for Transportation Studies, Report CTS81-1, M.I.T., Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  18. Chu, Y.-L. (1999). "Network equilibrium model of employment location and travel choices." Transportation Research Record, No. 1667, pp. 60–66.Google Scholar
  19. de Palma, A.; Ginsburgh, V.; Labbe, M.; Thisse, J.-F. (1989). "Competitive location with random utilities." Transportation Science, Vol. 23, pp. 244–252.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. Dembo, R. (1983). NLPNET User's Manual, Yale School of Organization and Management, New Haven, Connecticut.Google Scholar
  21. Dennis, S. M. (1999). "Using spatial equilibrium models to analyze transportation rates: an application to steam coal in the United states." Transportation Research E, Vol. 35, pp. 145–154.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  22. Eaton, B. H.; Lipsey, R. G. (1977). "The introduction of space into the neoclassical model of value theory." in Studies in Modern Economics (M. J. Artis and A. R. Nobay — editors), Basil Blackwell, Oxford, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
  23. Eaton, B. H.; Lipsey, R. G. (1978). "Freedom of entry and the existence of pure profit." Economic Journal, Vol. 88, pp. 455–469.Google Scholar
  24. Eiselt, H. A. (1995). "Perception and information in a competitive location model." Working paper, Faculty of Administration, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada.Google Scholar
  25. Evans, S. (1976). "Derivation and analysis of some models for combining trip distribution and assignment." Transportation Research, Vol. 10, pp. 37–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Feng, C-M.; Lin J-J. (1992). "Impact analysis of major construction plans on regional development—a case study of Taiwan northern region." Transportation Planning Journal, Vol. 21, pp. 367–400, Institute of Transportation, Ministry of Transportation and Communication, Taiwan (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  27. Florian, M.; Nguyen, S.; Ferland, J. (1975). "On the combined distribution-assignment of traffic." Transportation Science, Vol. 9, pp. 43–53.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  28. Friesz, T. L.; Bernstein, D.; Mehta, N. J.; Tobin, R. L.; Ganjalizadeh, S. (1994). "Day-to-day dynamic network disequilibria and idealized traveler information systems." Operations Research. Vol. 42, pp. 1120–1136.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. Friesz, T. L.; Harker, P. T. (1983). "Multicriteria spatial price equilibrium network design: theory and computational results." Transportation Research, Vol. 17B, pp. 411–426.Google Scholar
  30. Friesz, T. L.; Suo, Z.-G.; Bernstein, D. (1998). "A dynamic disequilibrium interregional commodity flow model." Transportation Research B, Vol. 32, No. 7, pp. 467–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gabszewicz, J. J.; Thisse, J.F. (1986). "Spatial competition and the location of the firms." in Location Theory (J. J. Gabszewicz, J.F. Thisse, M. Fujita, and U. Schweizer-editors), Harwood Academic Publishers, Chur, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  32. Guder, F.; Morris, J. G.; Yoon, S. H. (1992). "Parallel computation of inter-temporal multicommodity spatial price equilibria in the presence of quotas." Working paper, Loyola University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar
  33. Harker, P. T. (1986). "Alternative models of spatial competition." Operations Research, Vol. 34, No. 3, pp. 410–425.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hof, J. G.; Bevers, M. (1998). Spatial Equilibrium for Managed Ecosystems, Columbia University Press, New York, New York.Google Scholar
  35. Infante-Macias, R.; Munoz-Perez, J. (1995). "Competitive location with rectilinear distances." European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 80, pp. 77–85.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. Jin, Y.-X.; Leigh, C. M.; Wilson, A. G. (1991). "Construction of an input-output table for Yorkshire and Humberside." Working paper 544, School of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
  37. Jones, P. C; Theise, E. S. (1989). "On the equivalence of competitive transportation markets an congestion in spatial price equilibrium models." Transportation Science, Vol. 23, pp. 112–117.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  38. Kanafani, A. (1983). Transportation Demand Analysis, McGraw-Hill, New York, New York.Google Scholar
  39. Ke, Y-S. (1997). "Alternative Implementations of Expanding Algorithms for Multi-commodity Spatial Price Equilibrium." Master's thesis, Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio.Google Scholar
  40. Kim, T. J. (1989). Integrated Urban Systems Modeling: Theory and Applications, Studies in Operational Regional Science, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  41. Knoblauch, V. (1991). "Generalizing location games to a graph." The Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol. 19, pp. 683–688.Google Scholar
  42. Knoblauch, V. (1996). "A pure strategy Nash equilibrium for a 3-firm location game on a sphere." Location Sciences, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 247–250.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  43. Miller, T. C; Tobin, R. L.; Friesz, T. L. (1991). "Stackelberg games on a network with Cournot-Nash oligopolistic competitors." Journal of Regional Science, Vol. 31, pp. 435–454.Google Scholar
  44. Miller, T.; Tobin, R. L.; Friesz, T. L. (1992). "Network facility-location models in Stackelberg-Nash-Cournot spatial competition." Papers in Regional Science, Vol. 71, pp. 277–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Miller, T. C.; Friesz, T. L.; Tobin, R. L. (1996). Equilibrium Facility Location on Networks, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.MATHGoogle Scholar
  46. Nagurney, A.; Aronson, J. (1989). "A general dynamic spatial price network equilibrium model with gains and losses." Networks, Vol. 19, pp. 751–769.MATHGoogle Scholar
  47. Nagurney, A.; Zhao, L. (1991). "A network equilibrium formulation of market disequilibrium and variational inequalities." Networks, Vol. 21, pp. 109–132.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  48. Nagurney, A. (1993). Network Economics: A Variational Inequality Approach, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, Massachusetts.MATHGoogle Scholar
  49. Nagurney, A. (2000). "Congested urban transportation Networks and emission paradoxes." Transportation Research D, Vol. 5, pp. 145–151.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  50. Nagurney, A.; Eydeland, A. (1992). "A splitting equilibration algorithm for the computation of large-scale constrained matrix problems: theoretical analysis and applications." Computational Economics and Econometrics, vol. 22 (H. Amman, D. Belsley and L. Pau — editors), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, Massachusetts, pp. 65–105.Google Scholar
  51. Nagurney, A.; Thore, S.; Pan, J. (1996). "Spatial market policy modeling with goal targets." Operations Research, Vol. 44, pp. 393–406.MATHGoogle Scholar
  52. Oppenheim, N. (1980). Applied Models in Urban and Regional Analysis, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  53. Oppenheim, N. (1995). Urban Travel Demand Modeling: From Individual Choices to General Equilibrium, Wiley-Interscience, New York, New York.Google Scholar
  54. Penchina, C. M. (1997). "Braess paradox: maximal penalty in a minimal critical network." Transportation Research A, Vol. 31, No. 5, pp. 379–388.Google Scholar
  55. Portugal, L.; Judice, J. (1996). "A hybrid algorithm for the solution of a single commodity spatial equilibrium model." Computers and Operations Research, Vol. 23, pp. 623–639.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  56. Putman, S. H. (1991). Integrated Urban Models 2: New Research and Applications of Optimization and Dynamics, Pion, London, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
  57. Ran, B.; Boyce, D. (1994). Dynamic Urban Transportation Models, Springer-Verlag, New York, New York.MATHGoogle Scholar
  58. Schneider, M. H.; Zenios, S. A. (1990). "A comparative study of algorithms for matrix balancing," Operations Research, Vol. 38, pp. 439–455.MATHGoogle Scholar
  59. Sheffi, Y. (1985). Urban Transportation Networks: Equilibrium Analysis with Mathematical Programming Methods, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  60. Soumis, F.; Nagurney, A. (1990). "A stochastic, dynamic airline network equilibrium model." Working paper, GERAD, Polytechnic School, Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
  61. Suzuki, Y.; Pak, P. S.; Kim, G. (1988). "Impact analysis of construction of the Kansai International Airport." Working paper, Faculty of Engineering, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.Google Scholar
  62. Theise, E. S.; Jones, P. C. (1988). "Alternative implementations of a diagonalization algorithm for multiple commodity spatial price equilibria." Technical Report 8-06, Department of Industrial Engineering and Management Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.Google Scholar
  63. Theise, E. S.; Jones, P. C. (1988). "A microcomputer-based implementation of the expanding equilibrium algorithm for linear, single commodity spatial price equilibrium problems." Operations Research Letters, Vol. 7, pp. 241–245.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  64. Theise, E. S.; Jones, P. C. (1988). "Nonlinear, single commodity spatial price equilibria and the expanding equilibrium algorithm: two strategies for implementation." Technical report 88-16, Department of Industrial Engineering and Management Science, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.Google Scholar
  65. Tobin, R. L.; Miller, T.; Friesz, T. L. (1996). "Incorporating competitors' reactions in facility location decisions: a market equilibrium approach." Location Science, Vol. 3, pp. 239–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Toyomane, N. (1988). Multiregional Input-Output Model in Long-run Simulation, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  67. Vickerman, R. W. (1980). Spatial Economic Behavior, St. Martin's, New York, New York.Google Scholar
  68. Wardrop, J. G. (1952). "Some theoretical aspects of road traffic research." Proceedings of the Institute of Civil Engineers, Part 2, United Kingdom, pp. 325–378.Google Scholar
  69. Webber, M. J. (1984). Explanation, Prediction, and Planning: the Lowry Model, Research in planning and design series, Pion, London, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
  70. Wilson, A. G.; Coelho, J. D.; Macgill, S. M; Williams, H. C. W. L. (1981). Optimization in Locational and Transport Analysis, Wiley, Chichester, United Kingdom.MATHGoogle Scholar
  71. Wu, Y. J.; Fuller, J. D. (1996). "An algorithm for the multiperiod market equilibrium model with geometric distributed lag demand." Operations Research, Vol. 43, pp. 1002–1012.Google Scholar
  72. Zhang, D.; Buongiorno, J.; Ince, P. J. (1993). "PELPS III—A Microcomputer Price Endogenous Linear Programming System for Economic Modeling." Version 1.0, Research paper FPL-RP-526, Forest Products Laboratory, Forest Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Personalised recommendations