Including Generation, Competition and Distribution in Location Allocation


Gravity Model Facility Location Composite Service Quadratic Assignment Problem State Park 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Agnihothri, S.; Karmarkar, U. S.; Kubat, P. (1982). "Stochastic allocation rules" Operations Research, Vol. 30, pp. 545–555.MATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, S. P.; Never, D. J. (1991). "Cournot competition yields spatial agglomeration." International Economic Review, Vol. 32, pp. 793–808.MATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Arasan, V. T.; Rajesh, R. (1996). "Land-use allocation for minimum travel intensity in Indian cities." Working paper, Transportation Engineering Division, Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Madras, India.Google Scholar
  4. Baumal, W. J. (1965). Economic Theory and Operations Analysis, Second Edition. Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  5. Beaumont, J. R. (1987). "Location-allocation models and central place theory." in Spatial Analysis and Location-Allocation Models (A. Ghosh and G. Rushton; editors). Van Nostrand, pp. 21–54.Google Scholar
  6. Ben-Akiva, M.; Bowman, J. L. (1996). "Integration of an activity based model system and a residential location model." Paper presented at the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, TRED Conference on Land use and Transportation, Cambridge, Massachusetts, October.Google Scholar
  7. Berman, O.; Krass, D. (1997). "Flow intercepting spatial interaction model: a new approach to optimal location of competitive facilities." Working paper, School of Management, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
  8. Bhat, C. R. (1997) "Covariance heterogeneity in nested logit models: econometric structure and application to intercity travel." Transportation Research B, Vol. 31, pp. 11–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Borgers, A.; Hofman, F.; Ponje, M.; Timmermans, H. (1998). "Toward a conjoint-based context-dependent model of task allocation in activity settings: some numerical experiments." Pre-print 98-0325, 77th Annual Transportation Research Board Meeting, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  10. Brandeau, M. L.; Chiu, S. S. (1991). "Location of competing facilities in a user-optimizing environment with market externalities." Working paper, Depts. of Industrial Engineering and Engineering-Economic Systems, Stanford University, Stanford, California.Google Scholar
  11. Brog, W. (1982). "Subjective perception of car costs." Transportation Research Record, No. 858, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  12. Brotchie, J. F.; Sharpe R. (1975). "A general land use allocation model: applications to Australian cities." Urban Development Models, (R. Baxter, M. Echenique and J. Owers; Editors). Construction Press, Lancaster, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
  13. Brotchie, J. F.; Dickey, J. W.; Sharpe R. (1976). "TOPAZ: Planning Technique and Applications." Draft Technical Report, Division of Building Research, CS1RO, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
  14. Burton, M. R; Chan, Y. (1993). "Facility location under spatial competition." Working paper, Department of Operational Sciences, Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio.Google Scholar
  15. Carroll, O. T.; Chan, Y.; Sexton, T.; Silkman, R. (1982). "An Assessment of Regional and State-wideEconomic Impacts of New York State Parks." Institute for Urban Science Research, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, New York.Google Scholar
  16. Cesario, F. J. (1975). "A combined trip generation and distribution model." Transportation Science, Vol. 9, pp. 211–223.Google Scholar
  17. Cesario, F. J.; Knetsch, J. L. (1976). "A recreation site demand and benefit estimation model." Regional Studies, Vol. 10, pp. 97–104.Google Scholar
  18. Chan, Y.; Carroll, T. O. (1985). "Estimating recreational travel and economic values of state parks." Journal of Urban Planning and Development, Vol. 111, pp. 65–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Clawson, M.; Knetsch, J. L. (1966). Economics of Outdoor Recreation. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland.Google Scholar
  20. Cochrane, R. A. (1975). "A possible economic base for the gravity model." Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, Vol. 9, pp. 34–49.Google Scholar
  21. de la Barra, T. (1989). Integrated Land Use and Transport Modelling, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
  22. dePalma, A.; Grinsburgh, V.; Labbe, M.; Thisse, J-F. (1989). "Competitive location with random utilities." Transportation Science, Vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 244–252.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dickey, J. W.; Leone, P. A.; Scharte, A. R. (1973). "Use of TOPAZ for generating alternate land use schemes" Highway Research Record, No. 422, Highway Research Board, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  24. Dobson, G.; Karmarkar, U. (1987). "Competitive location on a network." Operations Research, Vol. 35, pp. 565–574.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. Drezner, A.; Wesolowsky, G. O. (1999). "Allocation of demand when cost is demand-dependent." Computers & Operations Research, Vol. 26, pp. 1–15.CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. Fang, S.C.; Tsao, H.-S.J. (1995). "Linearly-constrained entropy maximization problem with quadratic cost and its applications to transportation planning problems" Transportation Science, Vol. 29, pp. 358–365.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  27. Foot, D. (1981). Operational Urban Models. Methuen, London, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
  28. Forsythe, S.; Chan, Y. (1993). "Facility location and price equilibrium." Working paper, Department of Operational Sciences, Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio.Google Scholar
  29. Fotheringham, A. S. (1983). "A new set of spatial-interaction models: the theory of competing destinations." Environment and Planning A, Vol. 15, pp. 15–36.Google Scholar
  30. Fujii, S.; Kitamura, R.; Monma, T. (1997). "A micro-simulation model system that produces individuals' activity-travel patterns based on random utily theory." Working paper, Department of Transportation Engineering Systems, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.Google Scholar
  31. Fujita, M; Ogawa, H.; Thisse, J-F. (1988). "A spatial competition approach to central place theory." Journal of Regional Science, Vol. 28, pp. 477–94.Google Scholar
  32. Gensch, D. H.; Ghose, S. (1997). "Differences in independence of irrelevant alternatives at individual vs aggregate levels, and at single pair vs full choice set." Omega, Vol. 25, pp. 201–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Goodchild, M. F.; Booth, P. J. (1976). "Modelling human spatial behavior in urban recreation facility site location." DP-007, Department of Economics, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
  34. Haag, G. (1989). Dynamic Decision Theory: Applications to Urban and Regional Topics, Kluwer.Google Scholar
  35. Hakimi, S. L. (1990). "Locations with spatial interactions: competitive locations and games." in Discrete Facility Location, (P. Mirchandani and R. Francis; editors). Wiley Interscience, New York, New York.Google Scholar
  36. Hansen, P.; Thisse J-F.; Wendell, R. E. (1990). "Equilibrium analysis for voting and competitive location problems" in Discrete Facility Location, (P. Mirchandani and R. Francis; editors). Wiley Interscience, New York, New York.Google Scholar
  37. Hansen, P.; Labbe, M. (1988). "Algorithms for voting and competitive location on a network." Transportation Science, Vol. 22, pp. 278–288.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. Healy III, R. W.; Jackson, R. W. (2001). “Competition ad complementarity local economic development: A nonlinear dynamic approach.” Studies in Regional & Urban Planning, Issue 8, December.Google Scholar
  39. Hicks, J. E.; Abdel-Al, M. M. (1998). "Maximum likelihood estimation for combined travel choice model parameters." Pre-print, 77th Annual Transportation Research Bard Meeting, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  40. Hodgson, M. J. (1978). "Toward more realistic allocation in location-allocation models: an interaction approach." Environment and Planning A, Vol. 10, pp. 1273–1285.Google Scholar
  41. Hughes, J. M., Lloyd R. D., editors (1977). "Outdoor Recreation—Advances in Applications of Economics." Technical Report WO-2, U. S. Forest Service, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  42. Hunt, J. D.; Teply, S. (1993). "A nested logit model of parking location choice." Transportation Research B, Vol. 27B, pp. 253–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hunt, J. D.; McMillan, J. D. P.; Abraham, J. E. (1994). "A stated preference investigation of influences on the attractiveness of residential locations." Pre-print, Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  44. Ingene, C. A.; Ghosh, A. (1990). "Consumer and producer behavior in a multi-purpose shopping environment." Geographical Analysis, Vol. 22, pp. 70–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Johnston, R. A.; Rodier, C. J. (1999). "Synergism among land use, transit, and travel pricing policies." Pre-print, 78th Annual Transportation Research Board Meeting, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  46. Koppelman, F.; Wen, C.-H. (1998). "Different nested logit models: which are you using?" Pre-print, 77th Annual Transportation Research Board Meeting, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  47. Koppelman, F.; Wen, C.-H. (1998a). "Alternative nested logit models: Structure, properties and estimation." Transportation Research B, Vol. 32, No. 5, pp. 289–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Labbe, M.; Hakimi, S. L. (1991). "Market and locational equilibrium for two competitors." Operations Research, Vol. 39, No. 5, pp. 749–756.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  49. Lee, C-K. (1987). "Implementation and evaluation of network equilibrium models of urban residential location and travel choices." Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Illinois.Google Scholar
  50. Leonardi, G. (1983). "The use of random-utility theory in building location-allocation models." in Locational Analysis of Public Facilities (J-F. Thisse and H.G. Zoller, editors). North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 357–383.Google Scholar
  51. Li, S.; Tirupati, G. (1994). "Dynamic capacity expansion problem with multiple products: technology selection and timing of capacity additions" Operations Research, Vol. 42, pp. 959–976.Google Scholar
  52. Matsushima, N. (2001). “Cournot competition and spatial agglomeration revisited.” Economic Letters, Vol. 73, Issue 2, pp. 175–177.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  53. Murray, A. T.; Gerrard, R. A. (1997). "Capacitated service and regional constraints in location-allocation modeling." Location Science, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 103–118.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  54. Neuberger, H. L. T. (1971). "User benefit in the evaluation of transport and land use plans." Journal of Transport Economics and Policy" Vol. 5, pp. 52–75.Google Scholar
  55. O'Kelly, M. E. (1987). "Spatial interaction based location-allocation models" in Spatial Analysis and Location-Allocation Models (A Ghosh and G Rushton, editors). pp. 302–326, Van Nostrand, New York, New York.Google Scholar
  56. O'Kelly, M. E.; Bryan, D. L. (1998). "Hub location with flow economies of scale." Transportation Research B, Vol. 32, No. 8, pp. 605–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Oppenheim, N. (1995). Urban Travel Demand Modeling—from Individual Choices to General Equilibrium. Wiley-Interscience, New York, New York.Google Scholar
  58. Pappis, C. P.; Karacapilidis, N. I. (1994). "Applying the service level criterion in a location-allocation problem" Decision Support Systems, Vol. 11, pp. 77–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pastor, J. T. (1994). "Bicriterion programs and managerial location decisions: application to the banking sector." Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 45, No. 12, pp. 1351–1362.MATHGoogle Scholar
  60. Puu, T. (1997). Mathematical Location and Land Use Theory: An Introduction. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.MATHGoogle Scholar
  61. Sherali, H. D.; Carter, T. B.; Hobeika, A. G. (1991). "A location-allocation model and algorithm for evacuation planning under hurricane/flood conditions" Transportation Research B, Vol. 25B, No. 6, pp. 439–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Smith, K.; Krishnamoorthly, M.; Palaniswami, M. (1996). "Neural versus traditional approaches to the location of interacting hub facilities." Location Science, Vol. 3, pp. 155–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Stahl, K. (1982). "Location and spatial pricing theory with non-convex transportation cost schedules." Bell Journal of Economics, Vol. 12, pp. 575–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Stopher, P. R.; Ergun, G. (1982). "The effect of location on demand for urban recreation trips." Transportation Research A, Vol. 16A, No. 1, pp. 25–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Thill, J-C. (1992). "Spatial competition and market interdependence." Papers in Regional Science, Regional Science Association, Vol. 71, No. 3, pp. 259–75.Google Scholar
  66. Thill, J-C; Wheeler, A. (2000). “Tree induction of spatial choice behavior.” Transportation Research Record, No. 1719, pp. 250–258.Google Scholar
  67. van Lierop, W. (1986). Spatial Interaction Modelling and Residential Choice Analysis, Gower.Google Scholar
  68. Vickerman, R. W. (1974). "The evaluation of benefits from recreational projects." Urban Studies, Vol. 11, pp. 277–288.Google Scholar
  69. Wang, F.; Guldmann (1996). "Simulating urban population density with a gravity-based model" Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Vol. 30, pp. 245–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Webber, M. J. (1978). "Spatial interaction and the form of the city" in Spatial Interaction Theory and Planning Models (A. Karlquist, L. Lundquist, F. Snickar, and J. W. Weibull; editors). North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 203–226.Google Scholar
  71. Webber, M. J.; O'Kelly, M. E.; Hall, P. D. (1979). "Empirical tests on an information minimizing model of consumer characteristics and facility location." Ontario Geography, Vol. 13, pp. 61–80.Google Scholar
  72. Williams, H. C. W. L. (1976). "Travel demand models, duality relations and user benefit analysis." Journal of Regional Science, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 147–166.Google Scholar
  73. Wu, T.-H.; Lin, J.-N. (2003). “Solving the competitive discretionary service facility location problem.” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 144, pp. 366–378.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Personalised recommendations