Making Gene-Modified Mice

  • M. Pasparakis
Part of the Ernst Schering Research Foundation Workshop book series (SCHERING FOUND, volume 50)

Concluding Remarks

Current advances in the technologies available for the manipulation of the mouse genome have revolutionised experimental biology and have provided an unprecedented tool for the in vivo analysis of gene function in mammals. Studies in gene-modified mice have made a major contribution to our current understanding of the molecular mechanisms governing mammalian embryonic development and physiology. Furthermore, this technology has allowed the generation of mouse models of numerous human genetic diseases, thus providing an in vivo experimental system for the study of the molecular and cellular mechanisms of disease pathogenesis. The application and further improvement of this technology in combination with current developments facilitating large-scale genome sequencing and annotation and the high-throughput analysis of gene expression and protein complex formation and function will undoubtedly play a central role in biomedical research in the years to come, hopefully leading to the better understanding of pathogenic mechanisms and to new, more effective therapeutic approaches to human disease.


Bacterial Artificial Chromosome Homologous Recombination Selection Marker Embryonic Stem Cell Line loxP Site 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Baron U, Freundlieb S, Gossen M, and Bujard H (1995) Co-regulation of two gene activities by tetracycline via a bidirectional promoter. Nucleic Acids Res:3605–3606Google Scholar
  2. Brinster RL, Chen HY, Trumbauer ME, Yagle MK, and Palmiter RD (1985) Factors affecting the efficiency of introducing foreign DNA into mice by microinjecting eggs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82:4438–4442PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bunting M, Bernstein KE, Greer JM, Capecchi MR, and Thomas KR (1999) Targeting genes for self-excision in the germ line. Genes Dev 13:1524–1528PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Casanova E, Fehsenfeld S, Mantamadiotis T, Lemberger T, Greiner E, Stewart AF, and Schutz G (2001) A CamKIIalpha iCre BAC allows brain-specific gene inactivation. Genesis 31:37–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Eggan K, Akutsu H, Loring J, Jackson-Grusby L, Klemm M, Rideout WM, 3rd, Yanagimachi R, and Jaenisch R (2001) Hybrid vigor fetal overgrowth and viability of mice derived by nuclear cloning and tetraploid embryo complementation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:6209–6214PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gong S, Zheng C, Doughty ML, Losos K, Didkovsky N, Schambra UB, Nowak NJ, Joyner A, Leblanc G, Hatten ME, and Heintz N (2003) A gene expression atlas of the central nervous system based on bacterial artificial chromosomes. Nature 425:917–925PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gossen M, Bonin AL, Freundlieb S, and Bujard H (1994) Inducible gene expression systems for higher eukaryotic cells. Curr Opin Biotechnol 5:516–520PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Grieshammer U, Lewandoski M, Prevette D, Oppenheim RW, and Martin GR (1998) Muscle-specific cell ablation conditional upon Cre-mediated DNA recombination in transgenic mice leads to massive spinal and cranial motoneuron loss. Dev Biol 197:234–247PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gu H, Marth JD, Orban PC, Mossmann H, and Rajewsky K (1994) Deletion of a DNA polymerase beta gene segment in T cells using cell type-specific gene targeting. Science 265:103–106PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hasty P, Rivera-Perez J, and Bradley A (1991) The length of homology required for gene targeting in embryonic stem cells. Mol Cell Biol 11: 5586–5591PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Hentze MW, and Kulozik AE (1999) A perfect message: RNA surveillance and nonsense-mediated decay. Cell 96:307–310PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hofmann A, Kessler B, Ewerling S, Weppert M, Vogg B, Ludwig H, Stojkovic M, Boelhauve M, Brem G, Wolf E, and Pfeifer A (2003) Efficient transgenesis in farm animals by lentiviral vectors. EMBO Rep 4:1054–1058PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Indra AK, Warot X, Brocard J, Bornert JM, Xiao JH, Chambon P, and Metzger D (1999) Temporally-controlled site-specific mutagenesis in the basal layer of the epidermis: comparison of the recombinase activity of the tamoxifen-inducible Cre-ER(T) and Cre-ER(T2) recombinases. Nucleic Acids Res 27:4324–4327PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kellendonk C, Tranche F, Monaghan AP, Angrand PO, Stewart F, and Schutz G (1996) Regulation of Cre recombinase activity by the synthetic steroid RU 486. Nucleic Acids Res 24:1404–1411PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kioussis D, and Festenstein R (1997) Locus control regions: overcoming heterochromatin-induced gene inactivation in mammals. Curr Opin Genet Dev 7:614–619PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lobe CG, Koop KE, Kreppner W, Lomeli H, Gertsenstein M, and Nagy A (1999) Z/AP a double reporter for ere-mediated recombination. Dev Biol 208:281–292PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lois C, Hong EJ, Pease S, Brown EJ, and Baltimore D (2002) Germline transmission and tissue-specific expression of transgenes delivered by lentiviral vectors. Science 295:868–872PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mansour SL, Thomas KR, and Capecchi MR (1988) Disruption of the proto-oncogene int-2 in mouse embryo-derived stem cells: a general strategy for targeting mutations to non-selectable genes. Nature 336:348–352PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mansuy IM, and Bujard H (2000) Tetracycline-regulated gene expression in the brain. Curr Opin Neurobiol 10:593–596PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mao X, Fujiwara Y, Chapdelaine A, Yang H, and Orkin SH (2001) Activation of EGFP expression by Cre-mediated excision in a new ROSA26 reporter mouse strain. Blood 97:324–326PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Metzger D, Clifford J, Chiba H, and Chambon P (1995) Conditional site-specific recombination in mammalian cells using a ligand-dependent chimeric Cre recombinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:6991–6995PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nagy A, Rossant J, Nagy R, Abramow-Newerly W, and Roder JC (1993) Derivation of completely cell culture-derived mice from early-passage embryonic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:8424–8428PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Oberdoerffer P, Otipoby KL, Maruyama M, and Rajewsky K (2003) Unidirectional Cre-mediated genetic inversion in mice using the mutant loxP pair lox66/lox71. Nucleic Acids Res 31:el40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Olson EN, Arnold HH, Rigby PW, and Wold BJ (1996) Know your neighbors: three phenotypes in null mutants of the myogenic bHLH gene MRF4. Cell 85:1–4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pasparakis M, Schmidt-Supprian M, and Rajewsky K (2002) IkappaB kinase signaling is essential for maintenance of mature B cells. J Exp Med 196:743–752PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rajewsky K, Gu H, Kuhn R, Betz UA, Muller W, Roes J, and Schwenk F (1996) Conditional gene targeting. J Clin Invest 98:600–603PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ray P, Tang W, Wang P, Homer R, Kuhn C 3rd, Flavell RA, and Elias JA (1997) Regulated overexpression of interleukin 11 in the lung. Use to dissociate development-dependent and-independent phenotypes. J Clin Invest 100:2501–2511PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rickert RC, Roes J, and Rajewsky K (1997) B lymphocyte-specific Cremediated mutagenesis in mice. Nucleic Acids Res 25:1317–1318PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Robertson E, Bradley A, Kuehn M, and Evans M (1986) Germ-line transmission of genes introduced into cultured pluripotential cells by retroviral vector. Nature 323:445–448PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rodriguez CI, Buchholz F, Galloway J, Sequerra R, Kasper J, Ayala R, Stewart AF, and Dymecki SM (2000) High-efficiency deleter mice show that FLPe is an alternative to Cre-loxP. Nat Genet 25:139–140PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sauer B (1998) Inducible gene targeting in mice using the Cre/lox system. Methods 14:381–392PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schaft J, Ashery-Padan R, van der Hoeven F, Grass P, and Stewart AF (2001) Efficient FLP recombination in mouse ES cells and oocytes. Genesis 31:6–10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schmidt-Supprian M, Courtois G, Tian J, Coyle AJ, Israel A, Rajewsky K, and Pasparakis M (2003) Mature T cells depend on signaling through the IKK complex. Immunity 19:377–389PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schonig K, Schwenk F, Rajewsky K, and Bujard H (2002) Stringent doxycy-cline dependent control of CRE recombinase in vivo. Nucleic Acids Res 30:el34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schultze N, Burki Y, Lang Y, Certa U, and Bluethmann H (1996) Efficient control of gene expression by single step integration of the tetracycline system in transgenic mice. Nat Biotechnol 14:499–503PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Seibler J, Zevnik B, Kuter-Luks B, Andreas S, Kern H, Hennek T, Rode A, Heimann C, Faust N, Kauselmann G, et al (2003) Rapid generation of inducible mouse mutants. Nucleic Acids Res 31:e 12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Soriano, P (1999) Generalized lacZ expression with the ROSA26 Cre reporter strain. Nat Genet 21:70–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. te Riele H, Maandag ER, and Berns A (1992) Highly efficient gene targeting in embryonic stem cells through homologous recombination with isogenic DNA constructs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:5128–5132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Thomas, KR, and Capecchi, MR (1987) Site-directed mutagenesis by gene targeting in mouse embryo-derived stem cells. Cell 51:503–512PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Vasioukhin V, Degenstein L, Wise B, and Fuchs E (1999) The magical touch: genome targeting in epidermal stem cells induced by tamoxifen application to mouse skin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:8551–8556PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yang XW, Model P, and Heintz N (1997) Homologous recombination based modification in Escherichia coli and germline transmission in transgenic mice of a bacterial artificial chromosome. Nat Biotechnol 15:859–865PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yu Y, and Bradley A (2001) Engineering chromosomal rearrangements in mice. Nat Rev Genet 2:780–790PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zheng, B, Sage, M, Sheppeard, EA, Jurecic, V, and Bradley, A (2000) Engineering mouse chromosomes with Cre-loxP: range, efficiency, and somatic applications. Mol Cell Biol 20:648–655PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Pasparakis
    • 1
  1. 1.EMBL Mouse Biology ProgrammeMonterotondo (RomeItaly

Personalised recommendations