Abstract
Humans perceive the boundary of locality vaguely. This paper presents how the indeterminate boundaries of localities can be represented in GIS. For this task, indeterminate boundaries of localities are modeled by a fuzzy set membership function in which generic rules on geospatial objects are incorporated. Georeferenced traffic crash data reveal that police officers identify localities precisely at best 88% of the time. An empirical analysis indicates that people are 6% more confident in identifying urban localities than rural localities. As a conclusion, fuzzy set theory seems to provide a reasonable mechanics to represent vague concept of geospatial objects. The comparison of urban versus rural localities with respect to location indeterminacy suggests that neighborhood types may affect the way humans acquire spatial knowledge and forge mental representations of it.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Allen JF (1983) Maintaining knowledge about temporal intervals. Communications of the ACM 26(11):832–843
Bailey TC, Gatrell AC (1995) Interactive Spatial Data Analysis. Longman Scientific & Technical, Essex, pp.303–308
Cohn A, Gotts N (1996) The ‘egg-yolk’ representation of regions with indeterminate boundaries. In: Burrough P, Frank AU (ed) Geographic Objects with Indeterminate Boundaries, Taylor & Francis, London, pp 171–187
Egenhofer M, Franzosa R (1991) Point-set topological spatial relations. INT J of Geographical Information Systems 5(2):161–174
Erwig M, Schneider M (1997) Vague regions. In: 5th international symposium on advances in spatial databases (SSD’97), LNCS Vol 1262, Springer, pp 298–320
Gahegan M (1995) Proximity operators for qualitative spatial reasoning, In: Frank AU, Kuhn W (ed) Spatial Information Theory: A Theoretical Basis for GIS. LNCS Vol 988, Springer, Berlin, Germany, pp 31–44
Golledge RG, Dougherty V, Bell S (1995) Acquiring spatial knowledge: survey versus route-based knowledge in unfamiliar environments. Annals of AAG 85(1):134–158
Goodchild MF (2001) A geographer looks at spatial information theory, In: Montello DR (ed) COSIT 2001, Springer-Verlag, London, pp.1–13
Gould P, White R (1986) Mental Maps. Harmondsworth, Penguin
Guarino N, Welty C (2000) Ontological analysis of taxonomic relationships. In: Laender A, Storey V (ed) Proceedings of ER-2000: The International Conference on Conceptual Modeling, Springer-Verlag
Hwang S, Thill JC (2003) Georeferencing Historical FARS Accident Data: A Preliminary Report, Unpublished document, Department of Geography and NCGIA, State University of New York at Buffalo
Kennedy, S (1989) The small number problem and the accuracy of spatial data-bases. In: Goodchild M, Gopal S (ed) Accuracy of Spatial Databases, Taylor & Francis, London, pp 187–196
Montello DR, Goodchild MR, Gottsegen J, and Fohl P (2003) Where’s down-towns?: behavioral methods for determining referents of vague spatial queries. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 3(2&3):185–204
NHTSA (1995) FARS 1996 Coding and Validation Manual. National Center for Statistics and Analysis, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C.
Robinson VB (1988) Some implications of fuzzy set theory applied to geographic databases. Computers, Environment, and Urban Systems 12:89–97
Schneider M (1999) Uncertainty management for spatial data in databases: fuzzy spatial data types. In: Guting RH, Papadias D, Lochovsky F (ed) SSD’99, LNCS Vol 1651, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, pp 330–351
Smith B (1995) On drawing lines on a map. In: Frank AU, Kuhn W (ed) Spatial information theory: A theoretical basis for GIS. LNCS Vol 988, Springer, Berlin, Germany, pp 475–484
Stefanakis E, Vazirgiannis M, Sellis T (1999) Incorporating fuzzy set methodologies in a DBMS repository for the application domain of GIS. INT J Geographical Information Science 13(7):657–675
Thill JC, Sui DZ (1993) Mental maps and fuzzy preferences. Professional Geographer 45: 264–276
Ullman EL (1956) The Role of Transportation and the Bases for Interaction. In: William TJ (ed) Man’s Role in Changing the Face of the Earth, University of Chicago Press, pp 862–80.
Wang F, Hall GB (1996) Fuzzy representation of geographic boundaries in GIS. INT J of Geographical Information Systems 10(5):573–590
Worboys M (2001) Nearness relations in environmental space. INT J Geographical Information Science 15(7):633–651
Yao X, Thill JC (2004) How far is too far? A statistical approach to context-contingent proximity modeling. Transactions in GIS, forthcoming
Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Information and Control 8:338–353
Zelinsky W (1980) North America’s vernacular regions. Annals of AAG 70(1):1–16
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Hwang, S., Thill, JC. (2005). Empirical Study on Location Indeterminacy of Localities. In: Developments in Spatial Data Handling. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26772-7_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26772-7_21
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22610-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-26772-0
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)