Activate Charcoal Moist Environment Wound Fluid Cutaneous Ulcer Hydrocolloid Dressing 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Winter GD: Formation of the scab and the rate of epithelization of superficial wounds in the skin of the young domestic pig. Nature 1962; 193:293–294PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hinman D, Maibach H: Effect of air exposure and occlusion on experimental human skin wounds. Nature 1963; 200:377–378PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Phillips TJ, Dover JS: Leg Ulcers. J Am Acad Dermatol 1991; 25:965–987PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Falanga V: Occlusive wound dressings: Why, when, which? Arch Dermatol 1988; 124:872–877PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Thomas S, Banks V, Bale S, et al: A comparison of two dressings in the management of chronic wounds. J Wound Care 1997; 6:383–386PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rovee DT, Kurowsky CA, Labun J, et al: Effect of local wound environment on epidermal healing. In Maibach H, Rovee DT (eds) Epidermal Wound Healing. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers. 1972; pp 159–181Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Barnett A, Berkowitz RL, Mills R, et al: Comparison of synthetic adhesive moisture vapor permeable and fine mesh gauze dressings for split-thickness skin graft donor sites. Am J Surg 1983; 145:379–381CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pickworth JJ, De Sousa N: Angiogenesis and macrophage response under the influence of Duoderm. In: Fibrinolysis and Angiogenesis in Wound Healing. Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica. 1988; pp 45–48Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Madden MR, Finkelstein JL, Hefton JM, et al: Optimal healing of donor site wounds with hydrocolloid dressings. In: Ryan TJ (ed) An Environment for Healing: The Role of Occlusion. London: Royal Society of Medicine. 1985; pp 133–137Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cherry GW, Cherry CA, Jones RL, et al: Clinical experience with DuoDERM in various ulcers and clot resolution in experimental full thickness wounds. In: Cederholm-Williams SA, Ryan TJ, Lydon MJ (eds) Fibrinolysis and Angiogenisis in Wound Healing. Princeton: Excerpta Medica. 1988; pp 19–23Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cherry GW, Ryan T, McGibbon D: Trial of a new dressing in venous leg ulcers. Practitioner 1984; 228: 1175–1178PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mumford JW, Mumford SP: Occlusive hydrocolloid dressings applied to chronic neuropathic ulcers. A study of efficacy in patients at a rural South Indian Hospital. Int J Dermatol 1988; 27:190–192PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Choucair M, Phillips TJ: Wound dressings. In: Freedberg IM, Eisen AZ, Wolff K, Austen KF, Goldsmith LA, Katz SI, Fitzpatrick TB (eds) Fitzpatrick's Dermatology in General Medicine, 5th edn. New York: McGraw-Hill. 1999; pp 2954–2958Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Thomas S, Banks V, Fear M, et al: A study to compare two film dressings used as secondary dressings. J Wound Care 1997; 6:333–336PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Field CK, Kerstein MD: Overview of wound healing in a moist environment. Am J Surg 1994; 167[Suppl]:2S–6SCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lawrence JC, Lilly HA: Are hydrocolloid dressings bacteria proof? Pharmaceutical J 1987; 239:184Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mendez MV, Raffetto JD, Phillips T, et al: The proliferative capacity of neonatal skin fibroblasts is reduced after exposure to venous ulcer wound fluid: A potential mechanism for senescence in venous ulcers. J Vasc Surg 1999; 30:734–743PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bucalo B, Eaglstein WH, Falanga V: Inhibition of cellular proliferation by chronic wound fluid. Wound Rep Reg 1993; 1:181–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    O'Toole EA, Marinkovich MP, Peavey CL, et al: Hypoxia increases human keratinocyte motility on connective tissue. J Clin Invest 1997; 100:2881–2891PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Varghese MC, Balin AK, Carter DM, et al: Local environment of chronic wounds under synthetic dressings. Arch Dermatol 1986; 122:52–57CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hunt TK, Pai MP: The effect of varying ambient oxygen tensions on wound metabolism and collagen synthesis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1972; 135:561–567PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Xia YP, Zhao Y, Tyrone JW, et al: Differential activation of migration by hypoxia in keratinocytes isolated from donors of increasing age: Implication for chronic wounds in the elderly. J Invest Dermatol 2001; 116:50–56CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gilchrist B, Reed C: The bacteriology of chronic venous ulcers treated with occlusive hydrocolloid dressings. Br J Dermatol 1989; 121:337–344PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Findlay D: Modern dressings: what to use. Austral Fam Physician 1994; 23:824–839Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hermans MH, Hermans RP: Duoderm, an alternative dressing for smaller burns. Burns Incl Therm Inj 1986; 12:214–219PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Turner TD: The development of wound management products. In: Krasner DL, Rodeheaver GT, Sibbald RG (eds) Chronic Wound Care, 3rd edn. Wayne PA: HMP Communications. 2001; pp 293–310Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Friedman SJ, Su WP: Management of leg ulcers with hydrocolloid occlusive dressing. Arch Dermatol 1984; 120:1329–1336CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Browne A, Dow G, Sibbald G: Infected wounds: definitions and controversies. In: Falanga V (ed) Cutaneous Wound Healing. London: Martin Dunitz. 2001; pp 203–219Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Parish LC, Witkowski JA: The infected decubitus ulcer. Int J Dermatol 1989; 28:643–647PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Niedner R, Schopf E: Wound infections and antibacterial therapy. In: Westerhof W (ed) Leg Ulcers: Diagnosis and Treatment. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 1993; pp 293–303Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lipsky BA, Berendt AR: Principles and practice of antibiotic therapy of diabetic foot infections. Diabet Metab Res Rev 2000; 16[Suppl 1]:S42–S46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Robson MC: Wound Infection: a failure of wound healing caused by an imbalance of bacteria. Surg Clin North Am 1997; 77:637–650CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Cutting KF, Harding KG: Criteria to identify wound infection. J Wound Care 1994; 3:198–201Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Limova M, Troyer-Caudle J: Controlled, randomized clinical trial of two hydrocolloid dressings in the management of venous insufficiency ulcers. J Vasc Nurs 2002; 20:22–34CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ovington LG: Wound dressings: their evolution and use. In: Falanga V (ed) Cutaneous Wound Healing, 1st edn. London: Martin Dunitz. 2001; pp 221–232Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bale S, Banks V, Haglestein S, et al: A comparison of two amorphous hydrogels in the debridement of pressure sores. J Wound Care 1998; 7:65–68PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Williams C: The role of Sterigel hydrogel wound dressing in wound debridement. Br J Nurs 1997; 6: 494–496PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Bale S, Harding KG: Using modern dressings to effect debridement. Prof Nurse 1990; 5:244–245PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Williams C: Intrasite Gel: a hydrogel dressing. Br J Nurs 1994; 3:843–846PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Flanagan M: The efficacy of a hydrogel in the treatment of wounds with non-viable tissue. A report of a multicentre dinical trial that assessed the efficacy of a hydrogel in wound debridement. J Wound Care 1995;4:264–267PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Smith J: Debridement of diabetic foot ulcers (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2003. Oxford: Update SoftwareGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Gilchrist T, Martin AM: Wound treatment with Sorbsan — an alginate fibre dressing. Biomaterials 1983;4:317–320CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Motta GJ: Calcium alginate topical wound dressings: a new dimension in the cost-effective treatment for exudating dermal wounds and pressure sores. Ostomy Wound Manage 1989; 25:52–56PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Sayag J, Meaume S, Bohbot S: Healing properties of calcium alginate dressings. J Wound Care 1996; 5: 357–362PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Bowler PG, Jones SA, Davies BJ, et al: Infection control properties of some wound dressings. J Wound Care 1999; 8:499–502PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Jacobsson S, Rothman U, Arturson G, et al: A new principle for the cleansing of infected wounds. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1976; 10:65–72PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Sawyer PN, Dowbak G, Sophie Z, et al: A preliminary report of the efficacy of Debrisan (dextranomer) in the debridement of cutaneous ulcers. Surgery 1979; 85:201–204PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Ljungberg S: Comparison of dextranomer paste and saline dressings for management of decubital ulcers. Clin Ther 1998; 20:737–743CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Skog E, Arnesjo B, Troeng T, et al: A randomized trial comparing cadexomer iodine and standard treatment in the out-patient management of chronic venous ulcers. Br J Dermatol 1983; 109:77–83Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Hansson C: The effects of cadexomer iodine paste in the treatment of venous leg ulcers compared with hydrocolloid dressing and paraffin gauze dressing. Cadexomer Iodine Study Group. Int J Dermatol 1998; 37:390–396CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Danielsen L, Cherry GW, Harding K, et al: Cadexomer iodine in ulcers colonised by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Wound Care 1997; 6:169–172PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Hillstrom L: Iodosorb compared to standard treatment in chronic venous leg ulcers — a multicenter study. Acta Chir Scand Suppl 1988; 544:53–56PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Kirsner RS, Martin LK, Drosou A: Wound microbiology and the use of antibacterial agents. In: Rovee DT, Maibach HI (eds) The Epidermis in Wound Healing. Boca Raton: CRC Press. 2004; pp 155–182Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Frost MR, Jackson SW, Stevens PJ: Adsorption of bacteria onto activated charcoal cloth: an effect of potential importance in the treatment of infected wounds Microbios Letts 1980; 13:135–140Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Butcher G, Butcher JA, Maggs FA: The treatment of malodorous wounds. Nurs Mirror Midwives 1976; 142:64Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Beckett R, Coombs TJ, Frost MR, et al: Charcoal cloth and malodorous wounds. Lancet 1980; 2:594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Mulligan CM, Bragg AJ, O'Toole OB: A controlled comparative trial of Actisorb activated charcoal cloth dressings in the community. Br J Clin Pract 1986; 400:145–148Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Deitch EA, Marino AA, Gillespie TE, et al: Silver nylon: a new antimicrobial agent. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1983; 23:356–359PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Tsai WC, Chu CC, Chiu SS, et al: In vitro quantitative study of newly made antibacterial braided nylon sutures. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1987; 165:207–211PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Falcone AE, Spadaro JA: Inhibitory effects of electrically activated silver material on cutaneous wound bacteria. Plast Reconstr Surg 1986; 77:455–459PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Furr JR, Russell AD, Turner TD, et al: Antibacterial activity of Actisorb Plus, Actisorb and silver nitrate. J Hosp Infect 1994; 27:201–208CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Wunderlich U, Orfanos CE: Treatment of venous ulcera cruris with dry wound dressings. Phase overlapping use of silver impregnated activated charcoal xerodressing. Hautarzt 1991; 42:446–450PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Thomlinson RH: Kitchen remedy for necrotic malignant breast ulcers. Lancet 1980; 2:707CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Chirife J, Scarmato G, Herszage L: Scientific basis for the use of granulated sugar in treatment of infected wounds. Lancet 1982; 1:560–561CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Cooper RA, Molan PC, Harding KG: Antibacterial activity of honey against strains of Staphylococcus aureus from infected wounds. J R Soc Med 1999; 92:283–285PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Efem SE: Clinical observations on the wound healing properties of honey. Br J Surg 1988; 75:679–681PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Zumla A, Lulat A: Honey — a remedy rediscovered. J R Soc Med 1989; 82:384–385PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Molan PC: Potential of honey in the treatment of wounds and burns. Am J Clin Dermatol 2001; 2: 13–19PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Mahr R: The mode of action of a superabsorbent polymer wound dressing (Tenderwet). Ostomy Wound Manage 2003; 49:8–9Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Paustian C: Debridement rates with activated poly acrylate dressings (Tenderwet). Ostomy Wound Manage 2003; 49:13–14PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Personalised recommendations