Advertisement

Fabric Evolution of an Unsaturated Compacted Soil during Hydromechanical Loading

  • Olivier Cuisinier
  • Lyesse Laloui
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Physics book series (SPPHY, volume 93)

Abstract

The main goal of this paper is to present the first results of a study performed to provide insights into the relationship between the hydromechanical stress path experienced by a compacted soil and the modification of its pore space geometry. A new oedometer employing the axis translation technique was used to characterize the hydromechanical behaviour of the tested material. The fabric of the tested samples was determined using the mercury intrusion porosimetry technique under 4 stress levels and two different suctions. From this information, the macro and micropore volume variations were then determined. The results showed that mechanical loading produced a progressive reduction of the macropore volume and a significant increase of the micropore volume beyond a stress of 250 kPa. The obtained results tend to demonstrate that suction strengthens soil fabric, as the initial “double structure” of the tested material was not destroyed in the case of the unsaturated sample by the loading up to 1 000 kPa, whereas, the saturated sample exhibited a more homogenous fabric.

Keywords

Mercury Intrusion Porosimetry Fabric Evolution Canadian Geotechnical Journal Double Structure Hydromechanical Behaviour 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Al-Mukhtar, M., Belanteur, N., Tessier, D. and Vanapalli, S.K., 1996. The fabric of a clay soil under controlled mechanical and hydraulic stress states. Applied Clay Science, 11, pp. 99–115.Google Scholar
  2. Alonso, E.E., Gens, A. and Josa, A., 1990. A constitutive model for partially saturated soils. Géotechnique, 40, pp. 405–430.Google Scholar
  3. Brustaert, W., 1968., The permeability of a porous medium determined from certain probability laws for pore-size distribution. Water Resources Research, 4, pp. 425–434.Google Scholar
  4. Collins, K. and Mcgown, A., 1974. The form and function of microfabric features in a variety of natural soils. Géotechnique, 24, pp. 223–254.Google Scholar
  5. Cuisinier, O. 2002. Hydromechanical behaviour of compacted swelling soils (in french). PhD thesis, INPL, Nancy, France, 165 p.Google Scholar
  6. Delage, P. And Lefebvre, G., 1984. Study of the structure of a sensitive Champlain clay and of its evolution during consolidation. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 21, pp. 21–35.Google Scholar
  7. Geiser, F. 1999. Mechanical behaviour of an unsaturated silt — Experimental study and constitutive modelling (in French). PhD thesis, Lausanne, Switzerland, 224 p.Google Scholar
  8. Gens, A. And Alonso, E.E., 1992. A framework for the behaviour of unsaturated expansive clays. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 29, pp. 1013–1032.Google Scholar
  9. Griffiths, F.J. And Joshi, R.C., 1989. Change in pore size distribution due to consolidation of clays. Géotechnique, 39, pp. 159–167.Google Scholar
  10. Juang, C.H. and Holtz, R.D., 1986, A probabilistic permeability model and the pore size density function, Int. Journal of Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 10, 543–553.Google Scholar
  11. Lambe, T.W., 1958, The engineering behaviour of compacted clays, Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division, ASCE, 84, pp. 1–35.Google Scholar
  12. Lapierre, C., Leroueil, S. and Locat, J., 1990. Mercury Intrusion and Permeability of Louisville clay, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 27, pp. 761–773.Google Scholar
  13. Leroueil, S. and Vaughan, P.R., 1990. The general and congruent effects of structure in natural soils and weak rocks. Géotechnique, 40, pp. 467–488.Google Scholar
  14. Penumadu, D. and Dean, J., 2000. Compressibility effect in evaluating the pore size distribution of kaolin clay using mercury intrusion porosimetry, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 37, pp. 393–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Qi, Y., Al-Mukhtar, M., Alcover, J.F. and Bergaya, F., 1996. Coupling analysis of macroscopic and microscopic behaviour in highly consolidated Na-laponite clays. Applied Clay Science, 11, pp. 185–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Richard, G., Cousin, I., Sillon, J.F., Bruand, A., and Guérif, J., 2001. Effect of compaction on the porosity of a silty soil: influence on unsaturated hydraulic properties. European Journal of Soil Science, 52, pp. 49–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Simms, P.H. and Yanful, E.K., 2001. Measurement and estimation of pore shrinkage and pore distribution in a clayey till during soil-water characteristic curve tests, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 38, pp. 741–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sivakumar, V. and Wheeler, S.J., 2000. Influence of compaction procedure on the mechanical behaviour of an unsaturated compacted clay. Part 1: wetting and isotropic compression, Géotechnique, 50, pp. 359–368.Google Scholar
  19. Yong, R.N. and Warkentin, B.P., 1975. Soil properties and behavior. Developments in Geotechnical Engineering, 5. 449 p.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Olivier Cuisinier
    • 1
  • Lyesse Laloui
    • 1
  1. 1.Soil Mechanics LaboratorySwiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne (EPFL)LausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations