Advertisement

Optimal Characteristic Parameters for the Disturbances in Turbulent Pipe Flow

  • Klaus Gersten
  • Heinz-Dieter Papenfuss

Keywords

Characteristic Parameter Shear Stress Distribution Swirl Number Minimal Program Wall Shear Stress Distribution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cebeci T, Chang KC (1978) A general method for calculating momentum and heat transfer in laminar and turbulent duct flows. Numerical Heat Transfer 1:39–68Google Scholar
  2. Gersten K, Merzkirch W, Wildemann C (2001) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Korrektur fehlerhafter Messwerte von Durchflussmessgeräten infolge gestörter Zuströmung. Patent No. 197 24 116Google Scholar
  3. Klein A (1981) REVIEW: Turbulent developing pipe flow. J. Fluids Eng. 103:243–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Mickan B (1999): Systematische Analyse von Installationseffekten sowie der Effizienz von Strömungsgleichrichtern in der Großgasmengenmessung. Doctor thesis, University EssenGoogle Scholar
  5. Morrison GL, DeOtte RE, Beam EI (1992) Installation effects upon orifice flow meters. Flow Meas. Instrum. 3:89–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Morrison GL, Hauglie I, DeOtte RE (1995) Beta ratio, axisymmetric flow distortion and swirl effects upon orifice flow meters Flow Meas. Instrum. 6:207–216Google Scholar
  7. Norman RS, Mattingly GE, McFaddin SE (1989) The decay of swirl in pipes. Proceedings International Gas Research Conference 1989:312–321Google Scholar
  8. Steenbergen W, Voskamp J (1998) The rate of decay of swirl in turbulent pipe flow. Flow Meas. Instrum. 9:67–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Sudo K, Sumida M, Hibara H (1998) Experimental investigation of turbulent flow in a circular-sectioned 90-degree bend. Exp. in Fluids 25:42–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Wildemann C (2000) Ein System zur automatischen Korrektur der Messabweichung von Durchflussmessgeräten bei gestörter Anströmung. Doctor thesis, Universität Essen. See also: Fortschritt-Berichte VDI, Reihe 8, Nr. 868Google Scholar
  11. Zagarola MV, Smits AJ (1998) Mean-flow scaling of turbulent pipe flow. J. Fluid Mech. 373:33–79CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Klaus Gersten
    • 1
  • Heinz-Dieter Papenfuss
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für Thermo- und FluiddynamikRuhr-Universität BochumBochumGermany

Personalised recommendations