How to Correct the Error Shift of an Ultrasonic Flow Meter Downstream of Installations

  • Carsten Ruppel
  • Franz Peters


Wall Shear Stress Vortex Pair Pressure Probe Straight Pipe Wall Shear Stress Distribution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Akashi K, Watanabe H, Koga K (1978) Flow rate measurement in pipe line with many bends. Mitsubishi Heavy Ind 15:87–96Google Scholar
  2. Baker RC (2000) Flow Measurement Handbook. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  3. Dean WR (1928) The streamline motion of fluid in a curved pipe. Phil.Mag.Ser.7(5):673–695Google Scholar
  4. Hilgenstock A, Ernst R (1996) Analysis of installation effects by means of computational fluid dynamics-CFD vs experiments?. Flow Meas.Instrum. 7:161–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Holden JL, Peters RJW (1991) Practical experiences using ultrasonic flow meters on high pressure gas. Flow Meas. Instrum. 2:69–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kalkühler K (1998) Experimente zur Entwicklung der Geschwindigkeitsprofile und Turbu-lenzgrößen hinter verschiedenen Gleichrichtern. Dissertation, Universität Essen; also published as VDI Fortschritt-Bericht, Reihe 7, Nr. 339, 1998, VDI-Verlag, DüsseldorfGoogle Scholar
  7. Peters F, Ruppel C (2004) A pressure probe for the detection of the flow direction close to walls. Case study: flow through a bend. Exp. in Fluids 36:813–818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ruppel C (2004) Die intelligente Korrektur der Fehlerverschiebung eines Ultraschall-Zählers bei gestörter Zuströmung. Dissertation Universität Duisburg-Essen. See also: Shaker-Verlag Aachen ISBN 3-8322-2414-9Google Scholar
  9. Ruppel C, Peters F (2004) Effects of upstream installations on the reading of an ultrasonic flowmeter. Flow Meas. Instrum. 15:167–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Schlüter T, Merzkirch W (1996) PIV measurements of the time-averaged flow velocity downstream of flow conditioners in a pipeline. Flow Meas. Instrum. 7:173–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Wildemann C, Merzkirch W, Gersten K (2002) A universal, nonintrusive method for correcting the reading of a flow meter in pipe flow disturbed by installation effects. J Fluids Eng 124:650–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Xiong W, Kalkühler K, Merzkirch W (2003) Velocity and turbulence measurements downstream of flow conditioners. Flow Meas. Instrum. 14:249–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carsten Ruppel
    • 1
  • Franz Peters
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für StrömungslehreUniversität EssenEssenGermany

Personalised recommendations