Advertisement

Correction of the Reading of a Flow Meter in Pipe Flow Disturbed by Installation Effects

  • Carsten Wildemann
  • Wolfgang Merzkirch
  • Klaus Gersten

Keywords

Reynolds Number Probability Density Function Wall Shear Stress Gate Valve Straight Pipe 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baker, RC (2000) Flow Measurement Handbook. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  2. Dengel P, Fernholz HH, Hess M (1987) Skin-friction measurements in two-and three-dimensional highly turbulent flows with separation. In: Comte-Bellot G, Mathieu J (Eds): Advances in Turbulence, Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp. 470–479Google Scholar
  3. Gersten K, Klika M (1998) The decay of three-dimensional deviations from the fully developed state in laminar pipe flow. In: Rath HJ, Egbers C (Eds.): Advances in Fluid Mechanics and Turbomachinery, Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp. 17–28Google Scholar
  4. Gersten K, Merzkirch W, Wildemann C (2001) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Korrektur fehlerhafter Messwerte von Durchflussmessgeräten infolge gestörter Zuströmung. Patent No. 197 24 116Google Scholar
  5. Laws EM (1990) Flow conditioning-A new development. Flow Meas Instrum 1:165–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Mattingly GE (1983) Volume flow measurements. In: Goldstein RJ (Ed.): Fluid Mechanics Measurements, Hemisphere Publ Corp, Washington DC, pp. 245–306Google Scholar
  7. Mattingly GE, Yeh TT (1991) Effects of pipe elbows and tube bundles on selected types of flow meters. Flow Meas Instrum 2:4–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Mattingly GE, Yeh TT (1994) Pipeflow downstream of a reducer and its effect on flowmeters. Flow Meas Instrum 5:181–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mickan B, Wendt G, Kramer R, Dopheide D (1996) Systematic investigation of pipe flows and installation effects using laser Doppler anemometry. Part II: The effect of disturbed flow profiles on turbine gas meters-A describing empirical model. Flow Meas Instrum 7:151–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Nitsche W (1994) Strömungsmesstechnik. Springer-Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  11. Reader-Harris MJ, Sattary JA, Spearman EP (1995) The orifice plate discharge coefficient equation-Further work. Flow Meas Instrum 6:101–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Wildemann C (2000) Ein System zur automatischen Korrektur der Messabweichung von Durchflussmessgeräten bei gestörter Anströmung. Doctor thesis, Universität Essen. See also: Fortschritt-Berichte VDI, Reihe 8, Nr. 868Google Scholar
  13. Xiong W, Kalkühler K, Merzkirch W (2003) Velocity and turbulence measurements downstream of flow conditioners. Flow Meas Instrum 14:249–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carsten Wildemann
    • 1
  • Wolfgang Merzkirch
    • 1
  • Klaus Gersten
    • 2
  1. 1.Institut für StrömungslehreUniversität EssenEssenGermany
  2. 2.Institut für Thermo- und FluiddynamikRuhr-Universität BochumBochumGermany

Personalised recommendations