Limits to Incentive Contracts in Politics



Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References to Part I

  1. Alesina, A., and H. Rosenthal (1995): Partisan Politics, Divided Government, and the Economy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  2. Alesina, A., and G. Tabellini (1990): “A Positive Theory of Fiscal Deficits and Government Debt,” Review of Economic Studies, 57(3), 403–414.Google Scholar
  3. Arrow, K. (1951): Social Choice and Individual Values. Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  4. Baron, D., and J. Ferejohn (1989): “Bargaining in Legislatures,” American Political Science Review, 83(4), 1181–1206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barro, R. (1973): “The Control of Politicians: An Economic Model,” Public Choice, 14, 19–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ben-Porath, Y. (1975): “The Years of Plenty and the Years of Famine — a Political Business Cycle?,” Kyklos, 28(2), 400–403.Google Scholar
  7. Bergstrom, T., L. Blume, and H. Varian (1986): “On the Private Provision of Public Goods,” Journal of Public Economics, 29, 25–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bernholz, P. (1997): “Property rights, contracts, cyclical social preferences and the Coase theorem: A synthesis,” European Journal of Political Economy, 13, 419–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. — (1999): “The generalized Coase Theorem and separable individual preferences: an extension,” European Journal of Political Economy, 15, 331–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bernholz, P., and F. Breyer (1993): Grundlagen der Politischen Ökonomie. Mohr.Google Scholar
  11. Besley, T. (2004): “Paying Politicians: Theory and Evidence,” Journal of the European Economic Association, 2, 193–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Besley, T., and S. Coate (1997): “An Economic Model of Representative Democracy,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 85–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. — (1998): “Sources of Inefficiency in a Representative Democracy: a Dynamic Analysis,” American Economic Review, 88(1), 139–156.Google Scholar
  14. Black, D. (1958): The Theory of Committees and Elections. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  15. Bleicken, J. (1991): Die athenische Demokratie. UTB, Paderborn.Google Scholar
  16. Buchanan, J., and G. Tullock (1965): The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy. University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  17. Buchanan, J., and R. Wagner (1977): Democracy in Deficit Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  18. Caselli, F., and M. Morelli (2004): “Bad Politicians,” Journal of Public Economics, 88, 759–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cohen, L., and R. Noll (1990): “The Political Discount Rate,” Technical Paper No. 209, Stanford University, Center for Economic Policy Research.Google Scholar
  20. Cukierman, A., and A. Meltzer (1986): “A Positive Theory of Discretionary Policy: The Cost of a Democratic Government and the Benefits of a Constitution,” Economic Inquiry, 24, 367–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dixit, A. (1995): The Making of Economic Policy: A Transaction Gosts Politics Perspective. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  22. Downs, A. (1957): An Economic Theory of Democracy. Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar
  23. Drazen, A. (2000): Political Economy in Macroeconomics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  24. Eichenberger, R. (2001): “Economic Innovations Depend Upon Political Innovations: On Deregulating the Political Process,” Working Paper, University of Fribourg.Google Scholar
  25. Enelow, J., and M. Hinich (1984): The Spatial Theory of Voting: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  26. Ferejohn, J. (1986): “Incumbent Performance and Electoral Control,” Public Choice, 50, 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Frey, B. (1983): Democratic Economic Policy. A Theoretical Introduction. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  28. Gersbach, H. (1993): “Politics and the Choice of Durability: Comment,” American Economic Review, 83(3), 670–673.Google Scholar
  29. — (2003): “Incentive Contracts and Elections for Politicians and the Down-Up Problem,” in Advances in Economic Design, ed. by M. Sertel, and S. Koray. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  30. — (2004a): “Competition of Politicians for Incentive Contracts and Elections,” Public Choice.Google Scholar
  31. — (2004b): “Competition of Politicians for Wages and Office,” CEPR Discussion Paper, 4261.Google Scholar
  32. Gersbach, H., and T. Kleinschmidt (2004): “Designing Democracies for Sustainability,” University of Heidelberg, (mimeo).Google Scholar
  33. Gersbach, H., and V. Liessem (2001): “Reelection Threshold Contracts in Politics,” CESifo Working Paper, 622.Google Scholar
  34. — (2003): “Incentive Contracts and Elections for Politicians with Multi-Task Problems,” CEPR Discussion Paper, 4074.Google Scholar
  35. Glazer, A. (1989): “Politics and the Choice of Durability,” American Economic Review, 79(5), 1207–1213.Google Scholar
  36. Güth, W., and M. Hellwig (1986): “The Private Supply of a Public Good,” Journal of Economics/Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie, 5, 121–159.Google Scholar
  37. Hart, O. (1995): Firms, Contracts and Financial Structure. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  38. Hellwig, M. (2001): “The Impact of the Number of Participants on the Provision of a Public Good,” Working Paper, University of Mannheim.Google Scholar
  39. Hibbs, D. J. (1977): “Political Parties and Macroeconomic Policy,” American Political Science Review, 71, 1467–1497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. — (1992): “Partisan Theory after Fifteen Years,” European Journal of Political Economy, 8, 361–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Holmström, B., and P. Milgrom (1991): “Multitask Principal-Agent Analyses: Incentive Contracts, Asset Ownership, and Job Design,” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 7, 24–52.Google Scholar
  42. Inman, R., and M. Fitts (1990): “Political Institutions and Fiscal Policy: Evidence from the US Historical Record,” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 6, 79–132.Google Scholar
  43. Jensen, H. (1997): “Credibility of Optimal Monetary Delegation,” American Economic Review, 87, 911–920.Google Scholar
  44. Kleinheyer, G. (1968): Die kaiserlichen Wahlkapitulationen. Geschichte, Wesen und Funktion. C.F. Müller, Karlsruhe.Google Scholar
  45. Leblanc, W., J. J. Snyder, and M. Tripathi (2000): “Majority-Rule Bargaining and the Underprovision of Public Investment Goods,” Journal of Public Economics, 75, 21–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Liessem, V. (2002): “Incentive Contracts for Politicians: A Viable Supplement to Democracies,” Working Paper, University of Heidelberg.Google Scholar
  47. Lipset, S. M. (1995): The Encyclopedia of Democracy. Congressional Quarterly, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  48. Lockwood, B. (1997): “State-Contingent Inflation Contracts and Unemployment Persistence,” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 29, 286–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lohmann, S. (2003): “Why Do Institutions Matter? An Audience Cost Theory of Institutionell Commitment,” Governance, 16(1), 95–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lottes, G. (2000): “Zwischen Herrschaftsvertrag und Verfassungsnotariat. Die Wahlkapitulationen der deutschen Kaiser und Könige.,” in Reich, Regionen und Europa in Mittelalter und Neuzeit Festschrift für Peter Moraw., ed. by P. Heinig, S. Jahns, H. Schmidt, R. C. Schwinges, and S. Wefers, pp. 133–148. Historische Forschungen. 67, Berlin.Google Scholar
  51. Lupia, A., and D. Mccubbins (1998): The Democratic Dilemma. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  52. Mailath, G., and A. Postlewaite (1990): “Asymmetrie Information Bargaining Procedures with Many Agents,” Review of Economic Studies, 57, 351–367.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  53. Merkel, W., H. Puhle, A. Croissant, C. Eicher, and P. Thierry (2003): Defekte Demokratien: Theorien und Probleme, Band 1. Leske + Budrich, Opladen.Google Scholar
  54. Messner, M., and M. Polborn (2003): “Paying Politicians,” Journal of Public Economics, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  55. Mueller, D. (1989): Public Choice II. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  56. Niskanen, W. (1971): Bureaucracy and Representative Government Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.Google Scholar
  57. Nordhaus, W. (1975): “The Political Business Cycle,” Review of Economic Studies, 42, 169–190.Google Scholar
  58. Olson, M. (1965): The Logic of Collective Action. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  59. — (1982): The Rise and Decline of Nations. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
  60. Osborne, M., and A. Slivinski (1996): “A Model of Political Competition with Citizen-Candidates,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111, 65–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Palfrey, T., and H. Rosenthal (1984): “Participation and the Discrete Provision of Public Goods,” Journal of Public Economics, 24, 171–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Persson, T., G. Roland, and G. Tabellini (1997): “Separation of Powers and Political Accountability,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 1136–1202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Persson, T., and L. Svensson (1989): “Why a Stubborn Conservative Would Run a Deficit: Policy with Time-Inconsistent Preferences,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 104(2), 325–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Persson, T., and G. Tabellini (1993): “Designing Institutions for Monetary Stability,” Carnegie-Rochester Conference on Public Policy, 39, 53–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. — (2000): Political Economics: Explaining Economic Policy. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  66. Poutvaara, P., and T. Takalo (2003): “Candidate Quality,” CESifo Working Paper, 1106.Google Scholar
  67. Pozza, M. (1997): “Wahlkapitulationen,” in Lexikon des Mittelalters, Band 8, ed. by N. Angermann, pp. 1914–1918. LexMA-Verlag, München.Google Scholar
  68. Rogoff, K. (1990): “Equilibrium Political Budget Cycle,” American Economic Review, 80(1), 21–36.Google Scholar
  69. Schmidt, M. (2000): Demokratietheorien. Leske + Budrich, Opladen.Google Scholar
  70. Sen, A. (1970): Collective Choice and Social Welfare. Holden-Day, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  71. Stiglitz, J., and A. Heertje (1989): The Economic Role of the State. Blackwell, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  72. Svensson, L. (1997): “Inflation Forecast Targeting: Implementing and Monitoring Inflation Targets,” European Economic Review, 41, 1111–1146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Tabellini, G., and A. ALESINA (1990): “Voting on the Budget Deficit,” American Economic Review, 80(1), 37–49.Google Scholar
  74. Tollison, R. (1982): “Rent Seeking: A Survey,” Kyklos, 4, 575–602.Google Scholar
  75. Vierhaus, R. (1977): Herrschaftsverträge, Wahlkapitulationen, Fundamentalgesetze. Max-Planck-Institut für Geschichte, Göttingen.Google Scholar
  76. Walsh, C. (1995a): “Optimal Contracts for Central Bankers,” American Economic Review, 81, 150–167.Google Scholar
  77. — (1995b): “Price Stability as the Objective of Monetary Policy and Recent Central Bank Reforms,” in NBER Macroeconomics Annual 1995, ed. by B. Bernanke, and J. Rotemberg.Google Scholar
  78. Weingast, B. (1981): “The Political Economy of Benefits and Costs: A Neoclassical Approach to Distributive Politics,” Journal of Political Economics, 89(4), 642–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Wittman, D. (1995): The Myth of Democratic Failure-Why Political Institutions Are Efficient. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Personalised recommendations