Advertisement

Quality of Vision After Refractive Surgery

  • Thomas Kohnen
  • Jens Bühren
  • Thomas Kasper
  • Evdoxia Terzi
Part of the Essentials in Ophthalmology book series (ESSENTIALS)

Keywords

Point Spread Function Contrast Sensitivity Pupil Size Refractive Surgery Posterior Capsule Opacifications 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Applegate RA, Gansel KA (1990) The importance of pupil size in optical quality measurements following radial keratotomy. Refract Corneal Surg 6:47–54PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Applegate RA, Howland HC, Sharp RP et al (1998) Corneal aberrations and visual performance after radial keratotomy. J Refract Surg 14:397–407PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Applegate RA, Thibos LN, Hilmantel G (2001) Optics of aberroscopy and super vision. J Cataract Refract Surg 27:1093–1107PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bach M (1996) The Freiburg Visual Acuity test — automatic measurement of visual acuity. Optom Vis Sci 73:49–53PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brunette I, Gresset J, Boivin JF et al (2000) Functional outcome and satisfaction after photorefractive keratectomy. Part 2: survey of 690 patients. Ophthalmology 107:1790–1796PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Endl MJ, Martinez CE, Klyce SD et al (2001) Effect of larger ablation zone and transition zone on corneal optical aberrations after photorefractive keratectomy. Arch Ophthalmol 119:1159–1164PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fay AM, Trokel SL, Myers JA (1992) Pupil diameter and the principal ray. J Cataract Refract Surg 18:348–351PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ghaith AA, Daniel J, Stulting RD et al (1998) Contrast sensitivity and glare disability after radial keratotomy and photorefractive keratectomy. Arch Ophthalmol 116:12–18PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ginsburg AP (1996) Next generation contrast sensitivity testing. In: Rosenthal B, Cole R (eds) Functional assessment of low vision. Mosby-Year Book, St. Louis, pp 77–88Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Grimmett MR, Holland EJ (1996) Complications of small clear-zone radial keratotomy. Ophthalmology 103:1348–1356PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hersh PS, Steinert RF, Brint SF (2000) Photore-fractive keratectomy versus laser in situ keratomileusis: comparison of optical side effects. Summit PRK-LASIK Study Group. Ophthalmology 107:925–933PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Holladay JT, Piers PA, Koranyi G et al (2002) A new intraocular lens design to reduce spherical aberration of pseudophakic eyes. J Refract Surg 18:683–691PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Koch DD, Kohnen T, Obstbaum SA et al (1998) Format for reporting refractive surgical data (editorial). J Cataract Refract Surg 24:285–287PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kohnen T (2001) Measuring vision in refractive surgery (editorial). J Cataract Refract Surg 27: 1897–1898PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kohnen T (2001) The squared, sharp-edged optic intraocular lens design (editorial). J Catataract Refract Surg 27:485Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lee YC, Hu FR, Wang IJ (2003) Quality of vision after laser in situ keratomileusis: influence of dioptric correction and pupil size on visual function. J Cataract Refract Surg 29:769–777PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lohmann CP, Fitzke F, O’Brart D et al (1993) Corneal light scattering and visual performance in myopic individuals with spectacles, contact lenses, or excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. Am J Ophthalmol 115:444–453PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Maloney RK (1990) Corneal topography and optical zone location in photorefractive keratectomy. Refract Corneal Surg 6:363–371PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Maroccos R, Vaz F, Marinho A et al (2001) Glare and halos after “phakic IOL”. Surgery for the correction of high myopia. Ophthalmologe 98:1055–1059PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    McLeod SD (2001) Beyond Snellen acuity. The assessment of visual function after refractive surgery (editorial). Arch Ophthalmol 119:1371–1373PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Møller-Pedersen T, Cavanagh HD, Petroll WM et al (1998) Corneal haze development after PRK is regulated by volume of stromal tissue removal. Cornea 17:627–639PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    O’Brart DP, Corbett MC, Verma S et al (1996) Effects of ablation diameter, depth, and edge contour on the outcome of photorefractive keratectomy. J Refract Surg 12:50–60Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pop M, Payette Y (2004) Risk factors for night vision complaints after LASIK for myopia. Ophthalmology 111:3–10PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rabin J, Wicks J (1996) Measuring resolution in the contrast domain: the small letter contrast test. Optom Vis Sci 73:398–403PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Roberts CW, Koester CJ (1993) Optical zone diameters for photorefractive corneal surgery. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 34:2275–2281PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Schallhorn SC, Kaupp SE, Tanzer DJ et al (2003) Pupil size and quality of vision after LASIK. Ophthalmology 110:1606–1614PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Seiler T, Reckmann W, Maloney RK (1993) Effective spherical aberration of the cornea as a quantitative descriptor in corneal topography. J Catataract Refract Surg 19[Suppl]:155–165Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Thibos LN, Applegate RA, Schwiegerling JT et al (2002) Standards for reporting the optical aberrations of eyes. J Refract Surg 18:S652–660PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Uozato H, Guyton DL (1987) Centering corneal surgical procedures. Am J of Ophthalmol 103: 264–275Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Van den Berg TJTP, Ijspeert JK (1992) Clinical assessment of intraocular stray light. Applied Optics 31:3694–3966Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Vetrugno M, Quaranta GM, Maino A et al (2000) Contrast sensitivity measured by 2 methods after photorefractive keratectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg 26:847–852PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wesemann W (2002) Visual acuity measured via the Freiburg visual acuity test (FVT), Bailey Lovie chart and Landolt Ring chart. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 219:660–667PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas Kohnen
    • 1
  • Jens Bühren
    • 1
  • Thomas Kasper
    • 1
  • Evdoxia Terzi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of OphthalmologyJohann Wolfgang Goethe-UniversityFrankfurt am MainGermany

Personalised recommendations