Image Homogeneity and Urban Demographics: An Integrated Approach to Applied Geo-techniques

  • Ryan R. Jensen
  • Jay D. Gatrell


Remote Sensing Image Texture Census Block Group Image Homogeneity Landsat Thematic Mapper Data 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anys, H., A. Bannari, D.C. He, and D. Morin. 1998. “Zonal mapping in urban areas with the helop of airport imaging MEIS-II.” International Journal of Remote Sensing 19:883–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Carr, J.R. 1999. “Classification of digital image texture using variograms.” In Advances in Remote Sensing and GIS Analysis. P.M. Atkinson and N.J. Tate, eds. Wiley, West Sussex, England. pp. 135–146.Google Scholar
  3. Chen, K. 1998. “Correlations between census dwelling data and remotely sensed data.” Presented at the 10th Annual Colloquium of the Spatial Information Research Centre, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.Google Scholar
  4. Chuvieco, E. 1999. “Measuring changes in landscape pattern from satellite images: short-term effects of ire on spatial diversity.” International Journal of Remote Sensing, 20:2331–2346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gong, P. and P.J. Howarth. 1992. “Frequency-based contextual classification and gray-level vector reduction for land-use identification.” Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 58:423–439.Google Scholar
  6. Haralick, R.M. 1979. “Statistical and structural approaches to texture.” Proceedings of the IEEE, 67:786–804.Google Scholar
  7. Haralick, R.M. 1986. “Statistical image texture analysis.” Handbook of Pattern Recognition in Image Processing, T.Y. Young and K.S. Fu eds, New York: Academic Press, pp. 247–280.Google Scholar
  8. Jensen, J.R. 1996. Introductory Digital Image Processing: A Remote Sensing Perspective. New Jersey, Prentice-HallGoogle Scholar
  9. Jensen, J.R. 2000. Remote Sensing of the Environment: An Earth Resources Perspective. New Jersey, Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  10. Jensen, R.R., J.R. Boulton, and B.T. Harper. 2003. “The Relationship Between Urban Leaf Area and Household Energy Usage in Terre Haute, Indiana, USA.” Journal of Arboriculture 29(4): 226–230.Google Scholar
  11. Karathanassi, V., C. Iossifidis, and D. Rokos. 2000. “A texture-based classification method for classifying built areas according to their density.” International Journal of Remote Sensing 21:1807–1823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lillesand, T.M. and Kiefer, R.W. 2000. Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation, 4th edition. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 724 pp.Google Scholar
  13. Longley, P.A. 2002. “Geographical information systems: will developments in urban remote sensing and GIS lead to ‘better’ urban geography?” Progress in Human Geography 26:231–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mesev, V. and P.A. Longley. 1999. “The role of classified imagery in urban spatial analysis.” In Advances in Remote Sensing and GIS Analysis. P.M. Atkinson and N.J. Tate, eds. Wiley, West Sussex, England. pp. 185–206.Google Scholar
  15. Musick, H.B., and H.D. Grover. 1990. “Image texture measures as indices of landscape patter.” In Quantitative Methods in Landscape Ecology. M.G. Turner and R.H. Gardner, eds. New York: Springer, pp.77–104.Google Scholar
  16. Schaale, M., I. Keller, and J. Fischer. 2000. “Land cover texture information extraction from remote sensing image data.” ASPRS Annual Conference, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  17. Zhang, J. and G.M. Foody. 1998. “A fuzzy classification of sub-urban land cover from remotely sensed imagery.” International Journal of Remote Sensing 19:2721–2738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ryan R. Jensen
    • 1
  • Jay D. Gatrell
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Geography, Geology & AnthropologyIndiana State UniversityTerre Haute

Personalised recommendations