Advertisement

Neoplastic and Inflammatory Diseases of the Colon

  • Jacques W.A.J. Reeders

Keywords

Ulcerative Colitis Barium Enema Crohn Disease Villous Adenoma Conventional Colonoscopy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Gelfand DW, Chen YM, Ott DJ (1987) Detection of colonic polyps on single-contrast barium enema study: emphasis on the elderly. Radiology 164:333–337PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rosenbusch G, Reeders JWAJ (1993) Kolon, Klinische Radiologie-Endoscopie. Thieme, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ott DJ (1996) Barium enema: colorectal polyps and carcinoma. Semin Roentgenol 31:125–141PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Morson BC, Dawson IMP (1979) Gastrointestinal pathology, 2nd edn. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Teoh SK, Whitman GJ, Chew PS (1996) Villous adenoma of the colon. Am J Roentgenol 167:1146Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Van Der Werken BS, Wu WC (1996) Endoscopic evaluation of colon polyps. Semin Roentgenol 31:118–124PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Thoeni RF, Menuck L (1977) Comparison of barium enema and colonoscopy in the detection of small colonic polyps. Radiology 124:631–635PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Miller RE, Lehman G (1978) Polypoid colonic lesions undetected by endoscopy. Radiology 129:295–297PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Thoeni RF, Petras A (1982) Double-contrast barium-enema examination and endoscopy in the detection of polypoid lesions in the cecum and ascending colon. Radiology 144:257–260PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dijkstra J, Reeders JWAJ, Tytgat GNJ (1995) Idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease: endoscopic-radiologic correlation. Radiology 197:369–375PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rex DK, Cummings OW, Helper DJ et al (1997) 5-year incidence of adenomas after negative colonoscopy in asymptomatic average-risk persons (abstract). Radiology 203:885Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kewenter J, Jensen J, Boijsen M et al (1987) Perception errors with double-contrast enema after a positive guaiac test. Gastrointest Radiol 12:79–82CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Saito Y, Slezak P, Rubio C (1989) The diagnostic value ofcombining flexible sigmoidoscopy and double contrast barium enema on a one stage procedure. Gastrointest Radiol 14:357–359CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Markus JB, Somers S, O’Malley BP et al (1990) Double-contrast barium enema studies: effect of multiple reading on perception error. Radiology 175:155–156PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Järvinen HJ, Mecklin JP, Sistonen P (1995) Screening reduces colorectal cancer rate in families with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 108:1405–1411CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Thoeni RF (1997) Colorectal cancer: radiologic staging. Radiol Clin North Am 35:457–485PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gore RM (1997) Colorectal cancer: clinical and pathologic fea tures. Radiol Clin North Am 35:403–429PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gelfand DW (1997) Colorectal cancer: screening strategies. Radiol Clin North Am 35:431–438PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Buetow PC, Buck JL, Carr NJ et al (1995) Colorectal adenocarcinoma: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 15:640–648PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Winawer SJ, Fletcher RH, Miller L et al (1997) Colorectal cancer screening: clinical guidelines and rationale. Gastroenterology 112: 594–642CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Okizuka H, Sugimura K, Shinozaki N et al (1995) Colorectal carcinoma: evaluation with ultrafast CT. Clin Imaging 19:247–251CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ott DJ, Wolfman NT (1996) Integrated imaging in colorectal cancer. Semin Roentgenol 31:166–169PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Levine MS, Glick SN, Rubesin SE, Laufer I (2002) Double-contrast barium enema examination and colorectal cancer: a plea for radiologic screening (editorial). Radiology 22:313–315Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Greenlee RT, Murray T, Bolden S, Wingo PA (2000) Cancer statistics, 2000. CA Cancer J Clin 50:7–33PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN et al (1993) Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med 329:1977–1981CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ahlquist D, Wieland H, Moertel C et al (1993) Accuracy of fecal occult blood screening for colorectal neoplasia. JAMA 269:1262–1267CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Simon JB (1998) Should ail people over the age of 50 have regular fecal occult-blood tests? Postpone population screening until problems are solved. N Engl Med 338:1151–1152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Luboldt W, Fletcher JG, Vogl TJ (2002) Colonography: current status, research directions and challenges. Update 2002 Eur Radiol 12: 502–524Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bruzzi JF, Moss AC, Fenlon HM (2001) Clinical Results by CT colonoscopy. Eur Radiol 11: 2188–2194CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    McCarthy PA, Rubesin SE, Levine MS et al (1995) Colon cancer: morphology detected with barium enema examination versus histopathologic stage. Radiology 197:683–687PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Johnson RD, Geisinger KR (1996) Colorectal adenocarcinoma: staging and histopathology. Semin Roentgenol 31:94–102PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Chong A, Shah IN, Levine MS et al (2002) Diagnostic yield of barium enema examination after incomplete colonoscopy. Radiology 223:620–624PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rex DK, Rahmani EY, Haseman JH et al (1997) Relative sensitivity of colonoscopy and barium enema for detection of colorectal cancer in clinical practice. Radiology 203:885Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bach DB (1995) Missed diagnosis of colorectal carcinoma at barium enema examination (letter to the editor). Radiology 194:580Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Brady AP, Stevenson GW, Stevenson I (1994) Colorectal cancer overlooked at barium enema examination and colonoscopy: a continuing perceptual problem. Radiology 192:373–378PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Cohan RH (1985) Computed tomography of epithelial neoplasms in the anal canal. Arm J Roentgenol 145:569Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Thompson WM (1989) Computed tomography of the rectum. Radiographics 7:773–779Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Rifkin MD, Ehrich SM, Rahs G (1989) Staging of rectal carcinoma: prospective comparison of endorectal US and CT. Radiology 170: 319–322PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Balthazar EJ, Rejibon AJ, Hulmick D, Nadich DP (1988) Carcinomas of the colon: detection and preoperative staging by CT. Am J Roentgenol 150:301–306Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Thoeni RF (1981) Detection and staging of primary rectal and rectosigmoidal carcinoma by computed tomography. Radiology 141: 135–138PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Goldman S, Arvidson H, Norming U, Lagerstad F et al (1991) Transrectal ultrasound and computed tomography in preoperative staging of lower rectal adenocarcinomas. Gastrointest Radiol 16: 259–263CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    De Lange EE (1987) Evaluation of primary rectal cancer with MRI: MR histopathologic correlation (abstract). Radiology 165:174Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    De Lange EE, Fechner RE, Spaulding CA, Edge SB (1992) Rectal carcinoma treated by preoperative irradiation: MR imaging and histopathologic correlation. Arm J Roentgenol 150:287–292Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    De Lange EE, Fechner RE, Wanebo HJ (1989) Suspected rectosig-moid carcinoma after abdominoperineal resection: MR imaging and histopathologic findings. Radiology 170:323–328PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Vining DJ, Gelfland DW (1994) Non-invasive colonoscopy using helical CT scanning, 3D reconstruction, and virtual reality. Presented at the 1994 meeting of the Society of gastrointestinal Radiologists, Maui, Hawaii; 13–18 February 1994Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Van Gelder RE, Venema HW, Serlie IWO et al (2002) CT colonography at different radiation dose levels: feasibility of dose reduction. Radiology 224:25–33PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Whiting BR, McFarland EG, Brink JA (2002) Influence of image acquisition parameters on CT artefact and polyp depiction in spiral CT colonography: in vitro evaluation. Radiology, 217:165–172Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Gluecker T, Meuwly JY, Percaore P et al (2002) Effect of investigator experience in CT colonography. Eur Radiol 12:1405–1409CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Mc Farland EG, Brink JA, Pilgram TK (2000), Spiral CT colonography: reader agreement and diagnostic performance with two-and three dimensional image-display techniques. Radiology 218:375–383Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Luboldt W, Bauerfeind P, Steiner P, Fried M, Krestin GP, Debatin JF (1997) Preliminary assessment of three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging for various colonic disorders. Lancet 349: 1288–1291CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Morrin MM, Farrell RJ, Keogam MT et al (2002) CT colonography: colonic distention improved by dual position but not intravenous glucagon. Eur Radiol 12:525–530PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    McFarland EG, Pilgram TK, Brink JA et al (2002) CT colonography: multiobserver diagnostic performance. Radiology 225:380–390PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Macari M, Bini EJ, Xue Xiaonan et al (2002) Colorectal neoplasms: prospective comparison of thin section low dose multi-detecter row CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection. Radiology 224:383–392PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Summers RM, Jeretko AK, Franaszek M, Malley JD, Johnson CD (2002) Colonic polyps: complementary role of computer-aided detection in CT colonography. Radiology 225:291–399PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Thomeer M, Bielen D, Vanbeckevoort D et al (2002) Patient acceptance for CT colonography. What is the real issue? Eur Radiol 12: 1410–1415CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Lefere PA, Gryspeerdt SS, Dewyspelaere J et al (2002) Dietary fecal tagging as a cleansing method before CT colonography: initial results — polyp detection and patient acceptance. Radiology 224: 390–403Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Lauwenstein TC, Gobhde SC, Ruehn SG et al (2002) MR colonography with barium-based fecal tagging. Initial clinical experience. Radiology 223:248–254PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Hara AK, Johnson CT, Reed JE et al (1996) Detection of colorectal polyps by computed tomographic colography: feasibility of a novel technique. Gastroenterology 110:284–290CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Hara AK, Johnson CD, Reed JE, Ahlquist DA, Nelson H, MacCarty RI, Harmsen WS, Ilstrup DM (1997) Detection of colorectal polyps with CT colography: initial assessment of sensitivity and specificity. Radiology 205:59–65PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Royster AP, Fenlon HM, Clarke PD, Nunes DP, Ferrucci JT (1997) CT colonoscopy of colorectal neoplasms: two-dimensional and three-dimensional virtual-reality techniques with colonoscopic correlation. Am J Roentgenol 169:1237–1242Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Morra A, Medure S, Ammar L, Ukmar M, Pozzi Muscelli R (1999) Colonoscopy with computed tomography with volume reconstruction. The results and a comparison with endoscopy and surgery. Radiol Med (Torino) 98:162–167Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Yee J, Hung RK, Akerkar GA, MCQuaid K, Wall SD, Steinauer-Gebauer AAM (2000) Performance of CT colonography for colorectal polyp detection in screening patients. ESGAR 2000. Eur Radiology 10:D1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Foster N, Wood C, Rosenberg M, Forbes G, Mendelson R (2000) A comparison of CT virtual colonoscopy in the detection of colorectal polyps and cancer. ESGAR 2000. Eur Radiol 10: D2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Lefere P, Van Holsbeeck B, Baekelandt M, Gryspeerdt S (2000) Virtual CT colonoscopy: initial results. ESGAR 2000. Eur Radiol 10: D3Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Fletcher JG, Johnson CD, Welch TJ et al (2000) Optimization of CT colonography technique: prospective trial in 180 patient. Radiology 216:704–711PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Morrin MM, Farrell RJ, Kruskal JVB, Reynolds K, McGee JB, Raptopoulos V (2000) Utility ofintravenously administered contrast material at CT colonography. Radiology 217:765–771PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Dachman AH, Kuniyoshi JK, Boyle CM et al (1998) CT colonography with three-dimensional problem solving for detection of colonic polyps. Am J Roentgenol 171:989–995Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Rex DK, Vining D, Kopecky KK (1999) An initial experience with screening for colon polyps using spiral (virtual colonoscopy), Gas-trointest Endosc 50:309–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Miao YM, Amin Z, Healy J et al (2000) A prospective single center study comparing computed tomography pneumocolon against colonoscopy in the detection of colorectal neoplasms. Gut 47: 832–837CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Mendelson RM, Foster NM, Edwards JT, Wood CJ, Rosenberg MS, Forbes GM (2000) Virtual colonoscopy compared with conventional colonoscopy: a developing technology. Med J Aust 173: 472–475PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Kay CL, Kulling D, Hawes RH, Young JW, Cotton PB (2002) Virtual endoscopy: comparison with colonoscopy in the detection of space-occupying lesions of the colon. Endoscopy 32:226–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Pescatore P, Glucker T, Delarive J et al (2000) Diagnostic accuracy and inter-observer agreement of CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy). Gut 46:126–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Spinizi G, Belloni G, Martegani A, Sangiovanni A, Del Favero C, Minoli G (2001) Computed tomographic colonography and conventional colonoscopy for colon diseases: a prospective, blinded study. Am J Gastroenterol 96:394–400PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Yee J, Akerkar GA, Hung RK, Steinauer-Gebauer AM, Wall SD, McQuaid KR (2001) Colorectal neoplasia: performance characteristics of CT colonography for detection in 300 patients. Radiology 219:685–692PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Hara AK, Johnson CD, MacCarty RL, Welch TJ, McCollough CH, Harmsen WS (2001) CT colonography: single-versus multi-detector row imaging. Radiology 219:461–465PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Luboldt W, Bauerfeind P, Wildermuth S, Marincek B, Fried M, Debatin JF (2000) Colonic masses: detection with MR colonography. Radiology 216:383–388PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Pappalardo G, Polettini E, Frattarol FM et al (2002) Magnetic resonance colonography versus conventional colonoscopy of the detection of chronic endoluminal lesions. Gastroenterology 119: 300–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Neri E, Giusti P, Batolla L et al (2002) Colorectal cancer: role of CT colonography in preoperative evaluation after incomplete colonoscopy. Radiology, 223:615–619PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Fenlon HM, Nunes DP, Schroy PC III, Barish MA, Clarke PD, Ferrucci JT (1999) A comparison of virtual and conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps. N Engl J Med 342: 1496–1503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Waye JD, Lewis BS, Frankel A, Geller SA (1998) Small colon polyps, Am J Gastroenterol 83:120–122Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Dasmahapatra KS, Lopyan K (1989) Rationale for aggressive colonoscopy in patients with colorectal neoplasia. Arch Surg 124: 63–66PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Morrin MM, Kruskal JB, Ferrell RJ, Goldberg SN, McGee JB, Raptopoulos V (1999) Endoluminal CT colonography after incomplete endoscopic colonoscopy. Am J Roentgenol 172:913–918Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Macari M, Milano A, Lavelle N, Bernan P, Megibow AJ (2000) Comparison of time-efficient CT colonography with two and three dimensional colonic evaluation for detecting colorectal polyps. Am J Roentgenol 174:1543–1549Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Smith RA, von Eschenbach AC, Wender R et al (2001) American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer update of early detection guidelines for prostate, colorectal and endometrial cancer. Ca Cancer J Clin 51:28–75Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Levine MS, Glick SN, Rubersin SE, Laufer I (2002), Double contrast barium enema examination and colorectal cancer: a plea for radiologic screening. Radiology 222:313–315PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Glick S, Wagner JL, Johnson CD (1998) Cost-effectiveness of double-contrast barium enema in screening for colorectal cancer. Am J Roentgenol 170:629–636Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    McMahon PM, Bosch JL, Gleason S, Halpenn EF et al (2001) Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening. Radiology 219:44–50PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Mandel JS, Bond JH, Church TR et al (1993) Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. N Engl J Med 328:1365–1371CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Kostakoglu L, Agress H, Goldsmith SJ (2003) Clinical role of FDG PET in evaluation of cancer patients. Radiographics 23:315–340PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Huebner RF, Park KC, Shepherd JE, Schwimmer J, Czernin J (2000) A meta-analysis of the literature for whole body FDG-PET detection of recurrent colorectal cancer. J Nucl Med 41:1177–1189PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Watari J, Saitoh Y, Obara T et al (1997) Early nonpolypoid colorectal cancer: radiographic diagnosis of depth of invasion. Radiology 205:67–74PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Tada S, Yao T, Iida M et al (1994) Clinicopathologic study of small fiat colorectal carcinoma. Cancer 74:2430–2435PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Ridell RH, Goldman H, Ransohoff DF, Ähren C et al (1983) Dysplasia in inflammatory bowel disease. Standardized classification with provisional clinical applications. Hum Path 14:931–968PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Giardiello FM, Bayles TM (1996) Colorectal cancer and ulcerative colitis. Radiology 199:28–30PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Matsumoto T, Iida M, Kuroki F et al (1996) Dysplasia in ulcerative colitis: is radiography adequate for diagnosis? Radiology 199: 85–90PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Ribeiro MB, Greenstein AJ, Sachar DB et al (1996) Colorectal adenocarcinoma in Crohn’s disease. Ann Surg 233:186–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Gore RM (1992) Colonic contour changes in chronic ulcerative colitis: reappraisal of old concepts. Am J Roentgenol 158:59–61Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Reeders JWAJ, Rosenbusch G (1994) Clinical radiology and endoscopy of the colon. Thieme, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Hartmann D, Bazzler B, Zindler C, Rings S, Breer H, Schilling D, Adamek HE, Riemann JF, Layer G (2003) MR kolonographie in einem interdisziplinären Kooperationsproject — Erste Erfarungen am Klinikum Ludwigshafen, Electromedica 71 Heft 1:73–78Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Potthast S, Rieber A, von Tirpitz C, Wruk D, Adler G, Brambs HJ (2002) Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in Crohn’s disease: a comparison. Eur Radiol 12:1416–1422CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Bozkur T, Richter F, Lux G (1994) Utrasonography as a primary diagnostic tool in patients with inflammatory bowel disease and tumors of the small intestine and large bowel. J Clin Ultrasound 22: 85–91PubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Maconi G, Bollani S, Bianchi, Porro G (1996) Ultrasonographic detection of intestinal complications in Crohn’s disease. Dig Dis Sci 41:1643–1648PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Low RN, Sebrechts CP, Politoske DA, Bennett MT, Flores S, Snyder RJ, Pressman JH (2002) Crohn disease with endoscopic correlation: single-shot fast spin-echo and gadolinium-enhanced fat-suppressed spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging. Radiology 222: 652–660PubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Low RN, Francis IR, Politoske D, Bennett M (2000) Crohn’s disease evaluation: comparison of contrast-enhanced MR imaging and single phase helical CT scanning. J Magn Reson Imaging 11: 127–135CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Low RN, Francis IR (1997) MR imaging of the gastrointestinal tract with IV gadolinium and diluted barium oral contrast media compared with unenhanced MR imaging and CT. Am J Roentgenol 169:1051–1059Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    Maccioni F, Viscido A, Broglia L et al (2000) Evaluation of Crohn disease activity with magnetic resonance imaging. Abdom Imaging 25:219–228CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Semelka RC, Shoenut JP, Silverman R, Kroeker MA, Yaffe CS, Micflikier AB (1991) Bowel disease: prospective comparison of CT and 1.5-T pre-and postcontrast MR imaging with TI-weighted fat-suppressed and breath-hold FLASH, sequences. J Magn Reson Imaging 1:625–632PubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Schunk K, Kern A, Oberholzer K et al (2000) Hydro-MRI in Crohn’s disease: appraisal of disease activity. Invest Radiol 35:431–437CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Ernst O, Asselah T, Casblan X, Sergent G (1998) Breath-hold fast spin-echo MR imaging of Crohn’s disease. Am J Roentgenol 10: 1465–1469Google Scholar
  110. 110.
    Marcos HB, Semelka RC (2000) Evaluation of Crohn’s disease using half-Fourier RARE and Gadoliniumn-enhanced SGE sequences: initial results. Magn Reson Imaging 18:263–268CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Madsen SM, Thomsen HS, Schlichting P, Dorph S, Munkholm P (1991) Evaluation of treatment response in active Crohn’s disease by low-field magnetic resonance imaging. Abdom Imaging 24: 232–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jacques W.A.J. Reeders

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations