Genetic Diversity Parameters Associated with Viability Selection, Reproductive Efficiency, and Growth in Forest Tree Species

  • G. Müller-Starck
  • M. Ziehe
  • R. Schubert
Part of the Ecological Studies book series (ECOLSTUD, volume 176)


Gene Locus Seed Orchard Picea Abies European Beech Forest Tree Species 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allendorf W, Leary RF (1986) Heterozygosity and fitness in natural populations of animals. In: Soulé ME (ed) Conservation biology: the Science of Scarcity and Diversity, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, pp 57–76Google Scholar
  2. Arabidopsis Genome Initiative (2000) Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 408:796–815Google Scholar
  3. Baradat Ph, Adams WT, Müller-Starck G (eds) (1995) Population genetics and genetic conservation of forest trees. PSB Academic Publ, The Hague, 480 ppGoogle Scholar
  4. Bittkau C (2002) Charakterisierung der genetischen Variation europäischer Populationen von Acer spp. und Populus tremula auf der Basis der Chloroplasten-DNA: Rückschlüsse auf die postglaziale Ausbreitung und Differenzierung forstlicher Provenienzen. Doctoral Diss, Technische Universität München, Freising, 154 ppGoogle Scholar
  5. Blumenröther M, Bachmann M, Müller-Starck G (2001) Genetic characters and diameter growth of provenances of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). Silv Gen 50:212–222Google Scholar
  6. Bork P, Copley R (2001) Comparative genome analysis: Annotation and context. Nature 409:818–820CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bozhko M, Riegel R, Schubert R, Müller-Starck G (2003) A cyclophilin gene marker confirming geographical differentiation of Norway spruce and indicating viability response on excess soil born salinity. Mol Ecol 12:3147–3155CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Brewer S, Chedddadi R, de Beaulieu JL, Reille M and data contributors (2001) The migration of deciduous Quercus throughout Europe since the last glacial period. For Ecol Manage 156 ( 1-3):27–48Google Scholar
  9. Demesure B, Sodzi N, Petit RJ (1995) A set of universal primers for amplification of polymorphic non-coding regions of mitochondrial and chloroplast DNA in plants. Mol Ecol 4:129–131PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Dumolin-Lapègue S, Pemonge MH, Petit RJ (1997) An enlarged set of consensus primers for the study of organelle DNA in plants. Mol Ecol 6:393–397PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Eriksson G, Schelander B, Åkebrand V (1973) Inbreeding depression in an old experimental plantation of Picea abies. Hereditas 73:185–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fineschi S, Malvolti ME, Cannata F, Hattemer HH (eds) (1991) Biochemical markers in the population genetics of forest trees. SPB Academic Publ, The Hague, 251 ppGoogle Scholar
  13. Geburek T (2000) Effects of environmental pollution on the genetics of forest trees. In: Young A, Boshier D, Boyle T (eds) Forest conservation genetics. Principles and practice. CSIRO,Collingwood, Australia, pp 135–157Google Scholar
  14. Gillet EM (ed) (1999) “Which marker for which purpose?” Final compendium of the research project CT96-0706 “Development, optimisation and validation of molecular tools for assessment of biodiversity in forest trees”, EU-DGXII Biotech. FW IV Res Progr “Molecular tools for biodiversity”. Scholar
  15. Gregorius HR (1978) The concept of genetic diversity and its formal relationship to heterozygosity and genetic distance. Math Biosci 41:253–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gregorius HR (1987) The relationship between the concepts of genetic diversity and differentiation. Theor Appl Genet 74:397–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gregorius HR (1989) The attribution of phenotypic variation to genetic or environmental variation. In: Scholz F, Gregorius HR, Rudin D (eds) Genetic effects of air pollutants in forest tree populations. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 2–16Google Scholar
  18. Gregorius HR (1991) Gene conservation and the preservation of adaptability. In: Seitz A, Loeschke V (eds) Species conservation: a population-biological approach. Birkhäuser, Basel, pp 31–47Google Scholar
  19. Gregorius HR, Ziehe M (1995) Detecting independence in viability selection on two traits. Heredity 74:70–79Google Scholar
  20. Grivet D, Heinze B, Vendramin GG, Petit RJ (2001) Genome walking with consensus primers: application to the large single copy region of chloroplast DNA. Mol Ecol Notes 1:345–349Google Scholar
  21. Gwaze DP, Bridgewater FE, Williams CG (2001) Genetic analysis of growth curves for a woody perennial species, Pinus taeda L. Theor Appl Gen 105:526–531Google Scholar
  22. Hattemer HH, Bergmann F, Ziehe M (1993) Einführung in die Genetik für Studierende der Forstwissenschaft. Sauerländer, Frankfurt/Main, 492 ppGoogle Scholar
  23. Hewitt GM (2000) The genetic legacy of the Quaternary ice ages. Nature 405:907–913CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Hewitt GM (2001) Speciation, hybrid zones and phylogeography — or seeing genes in space and time. Mol Ecol 10:537–549CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Huntley B, Birks HJB (1983) An atlas of past and present pollen maps for Europe. Cambridge Univ Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  26. Karl TR, Nicholls N, Gregory J (1997) The coming climate. Sci Am 276:78–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Karp A, Isaac PG, Ingram DS (eds) (1998) Molecular tools for screening biodiversity: plants and animals. Chapman and Hall, London, p 498Google Scholar
  28. Kirst M, Johnson AF, Baucom C, Ulrich E, Hubbard K, Staggs R, Paule C, Retzel E, Whetten R, Sederoff R (2003) Apparent homology of expressed genes from wood-forming tissues of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda, L.) with Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:7383–7388CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Koski V (1973) On self-pollination, genetic load and subsequent inbreeding in some conifers. Comm Inst For Fenn 78(10):1–42Google Scholar
  30. La Scala S (2000) Microsatellite markers as a tool for the characterisation of genetic variation in populations of sessile oak (Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.). Dissertation, Technische Universität München, Freising, p 73Google Scholar
  31. Lawton JH, Brown VK (1993) Redundancy in ecosystems. In: Schulze ED, Mooney HA (eds) Biodiversity and ecosystem function. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 265–270Google Scholar
  32. Mitton JB, Grant MC (1984) Associations among protein heterozygosity, growth rate and developmental homeostasis. Annual revue of ecology and systematics, vol 15. Academic Press, New York, pp 479–499Google Scholar
  33. Müller(-Starck) G (1976) A simple method of estimating rates of self fertilization by analysing isozymes in tree seeds. Silv Gen 25:15–17Google Scholar
  34. Müller-Starck G (1985) Reproductive success of genotypes of Pinus sylvestris L. in different environments. In: Gregorius HR (ed) Population genetics in forestry. Lecture notes in biomathematics 60. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 118–133Google Scholar
  35. Müller-Starck G (1993) Auswirkungen von Umweltbelastungen auf genetische Strukturen von Waldbeständen am Beispiel der Buche (Fagus sylvatica L.). Sauerländer, Frankfurt/Main, 163 ppGoogle Scholar
  36. Müller-Starck G (1998) Isozymes. In: Karp A, Isaac PG, Ingram DS (eds) Molecular tools for screening biodiversity: plants and animals. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 75–81Google Scholar
  37. Müller-Starck G, Schubert R (2000) Genetic markers as a tool for bioindication in forest ecosystems. In: Young A, Boshier D, Boyle T (eds) Forest conservation genetics: principles and practice. CSIRO Publ, Collingwood, Australia an CABI Publ, Wallingford, pp 227–237Google Scholar
  38. Müller-Starck G, Schubert R (eds) (2001) Genetic response of forest systems to changing environmental conditions, vol 70. Forestry science. Kluwer, Dordrecht, 363 ppGoogle Scholar
  39. Müller-Starck G, Ziehe M (1984) Reproductive systems in conifer seed orchards. 3. Female and male fitnesses of individual clones realized in seeds of Pinus sylvestris L. Theor Appl Gen 6:173–177Google Scholar
  40. Paglia GP, Olivieri AM, Morgante M (1998) Towards second-generation STS (sequencetagged sites) linkage maps in conifers: a genetic map of Norway spruce (Picea abies K.). Mol Gen 258:466–478Google Scholar
  41. Paule L (1990) Bibliography: isozymes and forest trees. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, 82 ppGoogle Scholar
  42. Petit R, Aguinagalde I, Beaulieu JL, Bittkau C, Brewer S, Cheddadi R, Ennos R, Fineschi S, Grivet D, Lascoux M, Mohanty A, Müller-Starck G, Demesure-Musch B, Palmé A, Martin J, Rendell S, Vendramin G (2003) Glacial refugia: hotspots but not melting pots of genetic diversity. Science 300:1563–1565CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Reille M, Gamisans L, Beaulieu JL, Andrieu V (1997) The late-glacial at Lac de Creno (Corsica, France): a key site in the western Mediterranean basin. New Phytol 135:547–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Riegel R (2001) Entwicklung molekulargenetischer Marker bei der Fichte (Picea abies (L.) Karst) und deren Anwendung für genetische Erhebungen in umweltbelasteten Populationen. Doctoral Diss, Technische Universität München, Freising, 105 ppGoogle Scholar
  45. Riegel R, Schubert R, Metzger HG, Müller-Starck G (2004) Chloroplast microsatellite markers monitoring genetic differentiation of Picea abies (L.) Kart. In response to air and soil pollution. Ecologia (Bratislava) (in press)Google Scholar
  46. Schömig M (1988) Das Wachstum von Fichten-Kiefern-Beständen unter dem Einfluss von im Grundwasser angereicherten Straßenauftausalzen im Forstamt Gunzenhausen. Diploma Thesis, LMU, MunichGoogle Scholar
  47. Scholz F, Gregorius HR, Rudin D (eds) (1989) Genetic effects of air pollutants in forest tree populations. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 201 ppGoogle Scholar
  48. Schubert R, Müller-Starck G (2002) Development and application of molecular markers in conifers. In: Jain SM, Brar DS, Ahloowalia BS (eds) Molecular techniques in crop improvement. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 139–160Google Scholar
  49. Schubert R, Müller-Starck G, Riegel R (2001) Development of EST-PCR markers and monitoring their intrapopulational genetic variation in Picea abies (L.) Karst. Theor Appl Gen 103:1223–1231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tzschacksch O (1981) Stand und Perspektiven der forstlichen Rauchresistenzzüchtung in der DDR. Beitr Forstwirtsch 15:134–137Google Scholar
  51. Vendramin GG, Lelli L, Rossi P, Morgante M (1996) A set of primers for the amplification of 20 chloroplast microsatellites in Pinaceae. Mol Ecol 5:595–598CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Waring RH, Schlesinger WH (1985) Forest ecosystems: concepts and management. Academic Press, Orlando, 338 ppGoogle Scholar
  53. Weising K, Gardner RC (1999) A set of conserved PCR primers for the analysis of simple sequence repeat polymorphisms in chloroplast genomes of dicotyledonous angiosperms. Genome 42:9–19CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Wilson EO (ed) (1988) Biodiversity. National Academy Press, New York, 495 ppGoogle Scholar
  55. Wolf H (2001) Effects of extreme SO2 air pollution in winter 1995/1996 on vitality and growth of SO2-tolerant Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) clones in the Ore Mountains. In: Müller-Starck G, Schubert R (eds) Genetic response of forest systems to changing environmental conditions. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 35–49Google Scholar
  56. Yachi S, Loreau M (1999) Biodiversity and ecosystem productivity in a fluctuating environment: the insurance hypothesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:1463–1468CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Yu MH, Pakish LM, Zhou H (2001) An isozyme marker for resistance to root-knot nematode in sugarbeet. Crop Sci 41:1051–1053Google Scholar
  58. Ziehe M, Hattemer HH, Müller-Starck R, Müller-Starck G (1999) Genetic structures as indicators for adaptation and adaptational potentials. In: Mátyás C (ed) Forest genetics and sustainability. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 75–89Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Müller-Starck
  • M. Ziehe
  • R. Schubert

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations