An Introduction to the Functional Diversity of Temperate Forest Trees

  • Ch. Körner
Part of the Ecological Studies book series (ECOLSTUD, volume 176)


Tree Species Relative Growth Rate Seed Size Mixed Stand Stomatal Density 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anders S, Hofmann G (1996) Erforschung des ökologischen Wandels — Voraussetzung für künftige Waldbewirtschaftung. Mitt Bundesforschungsanst Forst-Holzwirtsch Hamburg 185:129–139Google Scholar
  2. Assmann E (1961) Waldertragskunde. BLV, MunichGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnes BV, Zak DR, Danton SR, Spurr SH (1998) Forest ecology. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Bassow SL, Bazzaz FA (1997) Intra-and inter-specific variation in canopy photosynthesis in a mixed deciduous forest. Oecologia 109:507–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bazzaz FA, Miao SL (1993) Successional status, seed size, and responses of tree seedlings to CO2,light, and nutrients. Ecology 74:104–112Google Scholar
  6. Binkley D (1992) Mixtures of nitrogen2-fixing and non-nitrogen-fixing tree species. In: Cannell MGR, Malcolm DC, Robertson PA (eds) The ecology of mixed-species stands of trees. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 99–123Google Scholar
  7. Binkley D, Senock R, Bird S, Cole TG (2003) Twenty years of stand development in pure and mixed stands of Eucalyptus saligna and nitrogen-fixing Facaltaria moluccana. For Ecol Manage 6226:1–10Google Scholar
  8. Bugmann HKM, Solomon AM (2000) Explaining forest composition and biomass across multiple biogeographical regions. Ecol Appl 10:95–114Google Scholar
  9. Cannell MGR, Malcolm DC, Robertson PA (eds) (1992) The ecology of mixed-species stands of trees. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  10. Canadell J, Jackson RB, Ehleringer JR, Mooney HA, Sala OE, Schulze ED (1996) Maximum rooting depth of vegetation types at the global scale. Oecologia 108:583–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ceulemans RJ, Saugier B (1991) Photosynthesis. In: Raghavendra AS (ed) Physiology of trees. Wiley, London, pp 21–50Google Scholar
  12. Cornelissen JHC (1999) A triangular relationship between leaf size and seed size among woody species: allometry, ontogeny, ecology and taxonomy. Oecologia 118:248–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cornelissen JHC, Castro Diaz P, Hunt R (1996) Seedling growth, allocation and leaf attributes in a wide range of woody plant species and types. J. Ecol 84:755–765Google Scholar
  14. Cornelissen JHC, Castro-Diez P, Carnelli AL (1998) Variation in relative growth rate among woody species. In: Lambers H, Poorter H, van Vuuren MMI (eds) Inherent variation in plant growth. Physiological mechanisms and ecological consequences. Backhuys, Leiden, pp 363–392Google Scholar
  15. Davis SD, Mooney HA (1986) Water use patterns of four co-occurring chaparral shrubs. Oecologia 70:172–177Google Scholar
  16. Dawson TE (1993) Hydraulic lift and water use by plants: implications for water balance, performance and plant-plant interactions. Oecologia 95:565–574Google Scholar
  17. Eamus D, Jarvis PG (1989) The direct effects of increase in the global atmospheric CO2 concentration on natural and commercial temperate trees and forests. Adv Ecol Res 19:1–55Google Scholar
  18. Eckstein RL, Karlsson PS, Weih M (1999) Leaf life span and nutrient resorption as determinants of plant nutrient conservation in temperate-arctic regions. New Phytol 143:177–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Elias P (1988) Stomata in forest communities: density, size and conductance. Acta Uni Carolinae Biol 31:27–41Google Scholar
  20. Ellenberg H (1996) Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit den Alpen, 5th edn. Ulmer, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  21. Ewel JJ, ODowd DJ, Bergelson J, Daehler CC, DAntonio CM, Gomez LD, Gordon DR, Hobbs RJ, Holt A, Hopper K.R, Hughes CE, LaHart M, Leakey RRB, Lee WG, Loope LL, Lorence DH, Louda SM, Lugo AE, McEvoy PB, Richardson DM, Vitousek PM (1999) Deliberate introductions of species: Research needs — Benefits can be reaped, but risks are high. Bioscience 49:619–630Google Scholar
  22. Gale MR, Gigal DF (1987) Vertical root distribution of northern tree species in relation to successional status. Can J For Res 17:829–834Google Scholar
  23. Gayer K (1886) Der gemischtes Wald. Seine Begründung und Pflege, insbesondere durch Horst-und Gruppenwirtschaft. Parey, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  24. Gleeson SK, Tilman D (1994) Plant allocation, growth rate and successional status. Funct Ecol 8:543–550Google Scholar
  25. Grote R, Pretzsch H (2002) A model for individual tree development based on physiological processes. Plant Biol 4:167–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Grubb PJ, Metcalfe DJ (1996) Adaption and inertia in the Australian tropical lowland rain-forest flora: contradictory trends in intergeneric and intrageneric comparisons of seed size in relation to light demand. Funct Ecol 10:512–520Google Scholar
  27. Gruber F (2003) Welche Witterung bestimmt die Fruchtbildung bei der Rotbuche? AFZ — Der Wald 5:246–250Google Scholar
  28. Hättenschwiler S, Körner Ch (2000) Tree seedling responses to in situ CO2-enrichment differ among species and depend on understorey light availability. Global Change Biol 6:213–226Google Scholar
  29. Hättenschwiler S, Schafellner C (2004) Gypsy moth feeding in the canopy of a CO2-enriched mature forest. Glob Change Biol 10, in pressGoogle Scholar
  30. Hoch G, Richter A, Körner Ch (2003) Non-structural carbohydrates in temperate forest trees. Plant Cell Environ 26:1067–1081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jackson RB, Canadell J, Ehleringer JR, Mooney HA, Sala OE, Schulze ED (1996) A global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial biomes. Oecologia 108:389–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jarvis PG, McNaughton KG (1986) Stomatal control of transpiration: scaling up from leaf to region. Adv Ecol Res 15:1–49Google Scholar
  33. Jarvis PG, Sandford AP (1986) Temperate forests. In: Baker NR, Long SP (eds) Photosynthesis in contrasting environments. Elsevier, Biomed Div, pp 199–236Google Scholar
  34. Kelty MJ (1992) Comparative productivity of monocultures and mixed-species stands. In: Kelty MJ, Larson BC, Oliver CD (eds) The ecology and silviculture of mixed-species forests. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 125–141Google Scholar
  35. Kenk GK (1992) Silviculture of mixed-species stands in Germany. In: Cannell MGR, Malcolm DC, Robertson PA (eds) The ecology of mixed-species stands of trees. Special publication of the British Ecological Society 11. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 53–63Google Scholar
  36. Koike T, Kitao M, Maruyama Y, Mori S, Lei TT (2001) Leaf morphology and photosynthetic adjustments among deciduous broad-leaved trees within the vertical canopy profile. Tree Physiol 21:951–958PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Körner Ch, Scheel JA, Bauer H (1979) Maximum leaf diffusive conductance in vascular plants. Photosynthetica 13:45–82Google Scholar
  38. Körner Ch (1993) Scaling from species to vegetation: the usefulness of functional groups. In: Schulze ED, Mooney HA (eds) Biodiversity and ecosystem function. Ecological Studies, vol 99. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 117–140Google Scholar
  39. Körner Ch (1994) Leaf diffusive conductances in the major vegetation types of the globe. In: Schulze ED, Caldwell MM (eds) Ecophysiology of photosynthesis. Ecological Studies, vol 100. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 463–490Google Scholar
  40. Körner Ch (1998) Alpine plants: stressed or adapted? In: Press MC, Scholes JD, Barker MG (eds) Physiological plant ecology. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 297–311Google Scholar
  41. Körner Ch (2000) Biosphere responses to CO2 enrichment. Ecol Appl 10:1590–1619Google Scholar
  42. Körner Ch (2003) Carbon limitation in trees. J Ecol 91:4–17Google Scholar
  43. Körner Ch, Bazzaz FA (1996) Carbon dioxide, populations, and communities. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  44. Kramer H (1988) Waldwachstumslehre. Paul Parey, HamburgGoogle Scholar
  45. Küppers M (1989) Ecological significance of above-ground architectural patterns in woody plants: a question of cost-benefit relationships. Tree 4:375–379Google Scholar
  46. LaDeau SL, Clark JS (2001) Rising CO2 levels and the fecundity of forest trees. Science 292:95–98CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Larcher W (1969) The effect of environmental and physiological variables on the carbon dioxide gas exchange of trees. Photosynthetica 3:167–198Google Scholar
  48. Leuschner C, Backes K, Hertel D, Schipka F, Schmitt U, Terborg O, Runge M (2001) Drought responses at leaf, stem and fine root levels of competitive Fagus sylvatica L. and Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. trees in dry and wet years. For Ecol Manage 149:33–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Loreau M (2000) Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: recent theoretical advances. Oikos 91:3–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mitchell KA, Bolstad PV, Vose JM (1999) Interspecific and environmentally induced variation in foliar dark respiration among eighteen southeastern deciduous tree species. Tree Physiol 19:861–870PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Mooney HA, Lubchenco J, Dirzo R, Sala OE (1995) Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: ecosystem analysis. In: Heywood VH, Watson RT (eds) Global biodiversity assessment. Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, pp 328–452Google Scholar
  52. Moore PD (1993) For richer, for poorer. Nature 366:515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Norby RJ, Wullschleger SD, Gunderson CA, Johnson DW, Ceulemans R (1999) Tree responses to rising CO2 in field experiments: implications for the future forest. Plant Cell Environ 22:683–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Norman JM, Jarvis PG (1974) Photosynthesis in Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr.). III. Measurements of canopy structure and interception of radiation. J Appl Ecol 11:375–398Google Scholar
  55. Parker GG, O’Neill JP, Higman D (1989) Vertical profile and canopy organization in a mixed deciduous forest. Vegetatio 85:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pepin S, Körner Ch (2002) Web-FACE: a new canopy free-air CO2 enrichment system for tall trees in mature forests. Oecologia 133:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Poole I, Weyers JDB, Lawson T, Raven JA (1996) Variations in stomatal density and index: implications for palaeoclimatic reconstructions. Plant Cell Environ 19:705–712Google Scholar
  58. Poorter H (1993) Interspecific variation in the growth response of plants to an elevated ambient CO2 concentration. Vegetatio 104/105:77–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pretzsch H (2001) Modellierung des Waldwachstums. Parey, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  60. Read DJ (1993) Plant-microbe mutualisms and community structure. In: Schulze ED, Mooney HA (eds) Biodiversity and ecosystem function. Ecological Studies, vol 99, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 181–209Google Scholar
  61. Reich PB, Grigal DF, Aber JD, Gower ST (1997) Nitrogen mineralization and productivity in 50 hardwood and conifer stands on diverse soils. Ecology 78:335–347Google Scholar
  62. Sampson DA, Smith FW, Long JN (1990) Use of canopy light interception to estimate forest leaf area index. Bull Ecol Soc Am [Suppl]71:313Google Scholar
  63. Saxe H, Ellsworth DS Heath J (1998) Tansley review no 98 Tree and forest functioning in an enriched CO2 atmosphere. New Phytol 139:395–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Schiller G (2000) Ecophysiology of Pinus halepensis Mill. and P. brutia Ten. In: Ne’eman G, Trabaud L (eds) Ecology, biogeography and management of Pinus halepensis and P. brutia forest ecosystems in the Mediterranean basin. Backhuys, Leiden, pp 51–65Google Scholar
  65. Schmid B (2002) The species richness-productivity controversy. Trend Ecol Evolut 17:113–114Google Scholar
  66. Schulze ED (1982) Plant life forms and their carbon, water and nutrient relations. Encycl Plant Physiol New Ser 12B. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 616–676Google Scholar
  67. Schulze ED, Kelliher FM, Körner Ch, Lloyd J, Leuning R (1994) Relationships among maximum stomatal conductance, ecosystem surface conductance, carbon assimilation rate, and plant nitrogen nutrition: a global ecology scaling exercise. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 25:629–660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Shugart HH, Leemans R, Bonan GB (1992) A systems analysis of the global boreal forest. Cambridge Univ Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  69. Smith SE, Read DJ (1997) Mycorrhizal symbiosis, 2nd edn. Academic Press, London, 605 ppGoogle Scholar
  70. Smith TM, Shugart HH, Woodward FI (1997) Plant functional types. IGBP book series 1. Cambridge Univ Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  71. Spinnler D, Egli P, Körner Ch (2002) Four-year growth dynamics of beech-spruce model ecosystems under CO2 enrichment on two different forest soils. Trees 16:423–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Sumida A (1993) Growth of tree species in a broadleaved secondary forest as related to the light environments of crowns. J Jpn For Soc 75:278–286Google Scholar
  73. Tangley L (2001) High CO2 levels may give fast-growing trees an edge. Science 292:36–37CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Veneklaas EJ, Poorter L (1998) Growth and carbon partitioning of tropical tree seedlings in contrasting light environments. In: Lambers H, Poorter H, van Vuuren MMI (eds) Inherent variation in plant growth. Physiological mechanisms and ecological consequences. Backhuys, Leiden, pp 337–361Google Scholar
  75. Walters MB, Kruger EL, Reich PB (1993) Growth,biomass distribution and CO2 exchange of northern hardwood seedlings in high and low light: relationships with successional status and shade tolerance. Oecologia 94:7–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Westoby M, Falster DS, Moles AT, Vesk PA, Wright IJ (2002) Plant ecological strategies: some leading dimensions of variation between species. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 33:125–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Whitehead D, Edwards WRN, Jarvis PG (1984) Conducting sapwood area, foliage area, and permeability in mature trees of Picea sitchensis and Pinus contorta. Can J For Res 14:940–947Google Scholar
  78. Wiedemann E (1943) Der Vergleich der Massenleistung des Mischbestandes mit dem Reinbestand. Allg Forst Jagdztg 119:123–132Google Scholar
  79. Wiedemann E (1955) Ertragskunde und waldbauliche Grundlagen der Forstwirtschaft, 2nd edn. Sauerländer, FrankfurtGoogle Scholar
  80. Wiemken V, Laczko E, Ineichen K, Boller T (2001) Effects of elevated carbon dioxide and nitrogen fertilization on mycorrhizal fine roots and the soil microbial community in beech-spruce ecosystems on siliceous and calcareous soil. Microb Ecol 42:126–135PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Wong SC, Cowan IR, Farquhar GD (1979) Stomatal conductance correlates with photosynthetic capacity. Nature 282:424–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ch. Körner

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations