Advertisement

Landscape-Scale Model Relating the Nordic Mountain Birch Forest Spatio-Temporal Dynamics to Various Anthropogenic Influences, Herbivory and Climate Change

  • A. O. Gautestad
  • F. E. Wielgolaski
  • I. Mysterud
Part of the Ecological Studies book series (ECOLSTUD, volume 180)

Keywords

Birch Forest Birch Tree Mountain Birch Autumnal Moth Forest Line 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aikio MS, Müller-Wille L (2002) Living at the timberline-the Sámi and the mountain birch forests in northernmost Europe. Finn For Res Inst Res Pap 862:40–56Google Scholar
  2. Aradottir AL, Arnalds O (2001) Ecosystem degradation and restoration of birch woodlands in Iceland. In: Wielgolaski FE (ed) Nordic mountain birch ecosystems. UNESCO, Paris, and Parthenon,New York, pp 293–306Google Scholar
  3. Boyce MS, Haney A (eds) (1997) Ecosystem management: applications for sustainable forest and wildlife resources. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  4. Bylund H (1995) Long term interactions between the autumnal moth and mountain birch: the roles of resources, competitors, natural enemies and weather. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, UppsalaGoogle Scholar
  5. Cappuccino N, Price PW (eds) (1995) Population dynamics: new approaches and synthesis. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  6. Gautestad AO, Wielgolaski FE (2001) Dynamic modeling of the mountain birch forest ecosystem: challenges related to space, time and scale. Skógrætarritid 1:145–150Google Scholar
  7. Haukijoja E, Neuvonen S, Hanhimäki S, Niemelä P (1988) The autumnal moth in Scandinavia. In: Berryman AA (ed) Dynamics of forest insect populations. Patterns, causes, and implications. Plenum Press, New York, pp 163–178Google Scholar
  8. Høgda KA, Karlsen SR, Solheim I (2001) Climatic change impact on growing season in Fennoscandia studied by a time series of NOAA AVHRR NDVI data. In: Proc International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symp, 9–13 July, Sydney, Australia. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, New Jersey, pp 1–3Google Scholar
  9. Kaneko K (ed) (1993) Theory and applications of coupled map lattices. Nonlinear science: theory and applications. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  10. King A (1991) Translating models across scales in the landscape. In: Turner MG, Gardner RH (eds) Quantitative methods in landscape ecology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 479–517Google Scholar
  11. Mladenoff DJ, Baker WL (eds) (1999) Spatial modeling of forest landscape change: approaches and applications. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  12. O’Neill RV, King AW (1998) Homage to St Michael; or, why are there so many books on scale? In: Peterson DL, Parker VT (eds) Ecological scale: theory and applications. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 3–15Google Scholar
  13. O’Neill RV, DeAngelis DL, Wade JB, Allen TFH (eds) (1986) A hierarchical concept of ecosystems. Monographs in population biology 23. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  14. Shugart HH, Urban DL (1988) Scale, synthesis, and ecosystem dynamics. In: Pomeroy LR, Alberts JJ (eds) Concepts of ecosystem ecology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 279–289Google Scholar
  15. Tenow O (1972) The outbreaks of Oporinia autumnata Bkh. and Operophtera spp. (Lep., Geometridae) in the Scandinavian mountain chain and northern Finland 1862-1968. Zool Bidr Uppsala Suppl 2:1–107Google Scholar
  16. Waring RH, Running SW (1998) Forest ecosystems: analysis at multiple scales. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. O. Gautestad
    • 1
  • F. E. Wielgolaski
    • 1
  • I. Mysterud
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of OsloOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations