Scientific Challenges for Anthropogenic Research in the 21st Century: Problems of Scale

  • Rik Leemans


Earth System Clean Development Mechanism Coarse Scale Environmental Kuznets Curve Qualitative Comparative Analysis 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alcamo J, Leemans R, Kreileman GJJ (1998) Global change scenarios of the 21st century. Results from the IMAGE 2.1 model. Pergamon and Elseviers Science, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Berkes F (2002). Cross-scale institutional linkages: Perspectives from the bottom up. In: Ostrom E, Dietz T, Dolsak N, Stern PC, Stonich S, Weber EU (eds) The Drama of the Commons. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, pp 293–322Google Scholar
  3. Blöschl G, Sivapalan M (1995) Scale issues in hydrological modelling: A review. Hydrological Processes 9: 251–290Google Scholar
  4. Bond G, Showers W, Cheseby M, Lotti R, Almasi P, deMenocal P, Priore P, Cullen H, Hajdas I, Bonani G (1997) A pervasive millennial-scale cycle in north Atlantic Holocene and Glacial climates. Science 278: 1257–1266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Broecker WS (1987) Unpleasant surprises in the greenhouse? Nature 328: 123–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chertow M (2001) The IPAT Equation and its variants: changing views of technology and environmental impact. Journal of Industrial Ecology 4: 13–29Google Scholar
  7. Claussen M (1996) On coupling global biome models with climate models. Climate Research 4: 203–221Google Scholar
  8. Claussen M, Gayler V (1997) The greening of the Sahara during the mid-Holocene: results of an interactive atmosphere-biome model. Global Ecology and Biogeography Letters 6: 369–377Google Scholar
  9. Costanza R, Maxwell T (1994) Resolution and predictability: an approach to the scaling problem. Landscape Ecology 9: 47–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Costanza R, Voinov A, Boumans R, Maxwell T, Villa F, Wainger L, Voinov H (2002) Integrated ecological economic modeling of the Patuxent river watershed, Maryland. Ecological Monographs 72: 203–231Google Scholar
  11. Cox PM, Betts RA, Jones CD, Spall SA, Totterdell IJ (2000) Acceleration of global warming due to carbon-cycle feedbacks in a coupled climate model. Nature 408:180–184Google Scholar
  12. Crutzen PJ (2002) Geology of mankind: The Anthropocene. Nature 415: 23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dietz T, Rosa EA (1994) Rethinking the environmental impacts of population, affluence and technology. Human Ecology Review 1: 277–300Google Scholar
  14. Ehrlich P, Holdren J (1971) Impact of Population Growth. Science 171: 1212–1217Google Scholar
  15. Ganopolski A, Kubatzki C, Claussen M, Brovkin V, Petoukhov VK (1998) The influence of vegetation-atmosphere-ocean interaction on climate during the mid-Holocene. Science 280: 1916–1919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Geist HJ, Lambin EF (2002) Proximate causes and underlying driving forces of tropical deforestation. Bioscience 52: 143–150Google Scholar
  17. IPCC (2001) Climate change 2001: synthesis report. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  18. Kainuma M, Matsuoka Y, Morita T (2002) Climate policy assessment: Asia-Pacific Integrated Modeling. Springer, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  19. Kremen C, Niles JO, Dalton MG, Daily GC, Ehrlich PR, Fay JP, Grewal D (2000) Economic incentives for rain forest conservation across scales. Science 288: 1828–1831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lambin EF, Turner BL, II, Geist HJ, Agbola SB, Angelsen A, Bruce JW, Coomes O, Dirzo R, Fischer G, Folke C, George PS, Homewood K, Imbernon J, Leemans R, Li X, Moran EF, Mortimore M, Ramakrishnan PS, Richards JF, Skånes H, Steffen WL, Stone GD, Svedin U, Veldkamp TA, Vogel C, Xu J (2001) The causes of landuse and land-cover change: moving beyond the myths. Global Environmental Change Human and Policy Dimensions 11: 261–269Google Scholar
  21. Leemans R (1999) Modelling for species and habitats: new opportunities for problem solving. Science of the Total Environment 240: 51–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Levin SA (1992) The problem of scale in ecology. Ecology 73: 1943–1967Google Scholar
  23. Lovell C, Madondo A, Moriarty P (2002) The question of scale in integrated natural resource management. Conservation Ecology 5: 25Google Scholar
  24. McCay BJ, Jentoft S (1998) Market or community failure? Critical perspectives on common property research. Human Organization 57: 21–29Google Scholar
  25. McConnell W (2002) Madagascar: Emerald isle or paradise lost? Environment 44:10–22Google Scholar
  26. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2003) People and Ecosystems: A Framework for Assessment and Action. Island Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  27. Myers N, Kent J (2001) Perverse subsidies. Island Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  28. Nepstad DC, Verissimo A, Alencar A, Nobre CA, Lima E, Lefebre PA, Schlesinger P, Potter C, Moutinho P, Mendoza E, Cochrane M, Brooks V (1999) Large-scale impoverishment of Amazonian forests by logging and fire. Nature 398: 505–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. O’Neill RV, King AW (1998). Homage to St. Michael: or why are there so many books on scale? In: Peterson DL, Parker VT (eds) Ecological Scale: Theory and Applications. Columbia University Press, New York, NY, pp 3–15Google Scholar
  30. O’Connor J (1988) Capitalism, nature, socialism: a theoretical introduction. Capitalism, Nature, Socialism 1: 11–38Google Scholar
  31. OECD’s InterFutures Study Team (1979) Mastering the probable and managing the unpredictable. Report Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and International Energy Agency, ParisGoogle Scholar
  32. Ostrom E, Dietz T, Dolsak N, Stern PC, Stonich S, Weber EU (eds) (2002) The drama of the commons. National Academy Press, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  33. Palloni A (1994). The relation between population and deforestation: methods for drawing causal inferences from macro and micro studies. In: Lourdes A, Stone MP, Major DC (eds) Population and environment: rethinking the debate. Westview, Boulder, Colorado, pp 125–165Google Scholar
  34. Petchel-Held G, Block A, Cassel-Gintz M, Kropp J, Lüdeke M, Moldehauer O, Reusswig F, Schellnhuber HJ (1999) Syndromes of global change: a qualitative modelling aproach to assist global environmental management. Environmental Modelling and Assessment 4: 295–314Google Scholar
  35. Roberts JT, Grimes PE (1997) Carbon intensity and economic development 1962–1971: a brief exploration of the environmental Kuznets curve. World Development 25: 191–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rotmans J (1990) IMAGE: An Integrated Model to Assess the Greenhouse Effect. PHD-thesis. Rijksuniversiteit Limburg, MaastrichtGoogle Scholar
  37. Rudel T, Roper J (1996) Regional patterns and historical trends in tropical deforestation, 1976–1990: a qualitative comparative analysis. Ambio 25: 160–166Google Scholar
  38. Schellnhuber H-J (1998). Global change: quantity turns into quality. In: Schellnhuber H-J, Wenzel V (eds) Earth system analysis. Springer, Berlin, pp 12–195Google Scholar
  39. Stafford Smith DM, Reynolds JF (eds) (2002) Integrated assessment and desertification. Dahlem University Press, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  40. Stern DI (1998) Progress on the environmental Kuznet’s Curve? Environment and Development Economics 3: 173–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Vimeux F, Masson V, Jouzel J, Stievenard M, Petit JR (1999) Glacial-interglacial changes in ocean surface conditions in the southern hemisphere. Nature 398:410–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Waggoner PE, Ausubel JH (2002) A framework for sustainability science: A renovated IPAT identity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99: 7860–7865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. White LJ (1967) The historical roots of our ecological crisis. Science 155: 1203–1207Google Scholar
  44. White R, Engelen G, Uljee I (1997) The use of constrained cellular automata for high-resolution modelling of urban land-use dynamics. Environment and Planning 24: 323–343Google Scholar
  45. York R, Rosa E, Dietz T (2003) Footprints on the Earth: the environmental consequences of modernity. American Sociological Review (in press)Google Scholar
  46. Young O (2002) The institutional dimensions of environmental change. The MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rik Leemans
    • 1
  1. 1.Environmental Systems Analysis GroupWageningen UniversityWageningen

Personalised recommendations