Advertisement

Numerical Considerations of Fluid Effects on Wave Propagation

  • Erik H. Saenger
  • Oliver S. Krüger
  • Serge A. Shapiro

Abstract

This paper is concerned with numerical considerations of fluid effects on wave propagation. The focus is on effective elastic properties (i.e. velocities) in different kinds of dry and fluid-saturated fractured media. We apply the so-called rotated staggered finite-difference grid (RSG) technique. Using this modified grid it is possible to simulate the propagation of elastic waves in a 2D or 3D medium containing cracks, pores or free surfaces without explicit boundary conditions and without averaging elastic moduli. Therefore the RSG allows an efficient and precise numerical study of effective velocities in fractured structures. This is also true for structures where theoretically it is only possible to predict upper and lower bounds. We simulate the propagation of plane P- and S-waves through three kinds of randomly cracked 3D media. Each model realization differs in the porosity of the medium and is performed for dry and fluid-saturated pores. The synthetic results are compared with the predictions of the well known Gassmann equation and the Biot velocity relations. Although we have a very low porosity in our models, the numerical calculations showed that the Gassmann equation cannot be applied for isolated pores (thin penny-shaped cracks). For Fontainebleau sandstone we observe with our dynamic finite-difference approach the exact same elastic properties as with a static finite-element approach. For this case the Gassmann equation can be checked successfully. Additionally, we show that so-called open-cell Gaussian random field models are an useful tool to study wave propagation in fluid-saturated fractured media. For all synthetic models considered in this study the high-frequency limit of the Biot velocity relations is very close to the predictions of the Gassmann equation. However, using synthetic rock models saturated with artificial “heavy” water we can roughly estimate the corresponding tortuosity parameter.

Keywords

Fracture Medium Gaussian Random Field Fluid Effect Effective Velocity Effective Elastic Property 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Arns, C. H., Knackstedt, M. A., Pinczewski, W. V., and Garboczi, E. J., 2002, Computation of linear elastic properties from microtomographic images: Methodology and agreement between theory and experiment: Geophysics, 67, 1396–1405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Berryman, J. G., 1981, Elastic wave propagation in fluid-saturated porous media: J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., 69, 416–424.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kelly, K. R., Ward, R. W., Treitel, S., and Alford, R. M., 1976, Synthetic seismograms: A finite-difference approach: Geophysics, 41, 2–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mavko, G., Mukerji, T., and Dvorkin, J., 1998, The rock physics handbook: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Orlowsky, B., Saenger, E. H., Guéguen, Y., and Shapiro, S. A., 2003, Effects of parallel crack distributions on effective elastic properties-a numerical study: International Journal of Fractures, 124(3–4), L171–L178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Roberts, A. P., and Garboczi, E. J., 2002, Computation of the linear elastic properties of random porous materials with a wide variety of microstructure: Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A, 458, 1033–1054.MATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Saenger, E. H., and Bohlen, T., 2004, Anisotropic and viscoelastic finite-difference modeling using the rotated staggered grid: Geophysics, 69, in print.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Saenger, E. H., and Shapiro, S. A., 2002, Effective velocities in fractured media: A numerical study using the rotated staggered finite-difference grid: Geophys. Prosp., 50(2), 183–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Saenger, E. H., Gold, N., and Shapiro, S. A., 2000, Modeling the propagation of elastic waves using a modified finite-difference grid: Wave Motion, 31(1), 77–92.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Saenger, E. H., Krüger, O. S., and Shapiro, S. A., 2004, Effective elastic proper ties of randomly fractured solids: 3D numerical experiments: Geophys. Prosp., 52(3), in print.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wang, Z., and Nur, A., 1990, Dispersion analysis of acoustic velocities in rocks: J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., 87, 2384–2395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang, Z., 2000, The Gassmann Equation Revisited: Comparing Laboratory Data with Gassmann’s Predictions, in Wang, Z., and Nur, A., Eds., Seismic and Acoustic Velocities in Reservoir Rocks: Society of Exploration Geophysics, 8–23.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erik H. Saenger
    • 1
  • Oliver S. Krüger
    • 1
  • Serge A. Shapiro
    • 1
  1. 1.Fachrichtung GeophysikFreie Universität BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations