Finding a Modern Role for the Prior Appropriation Doctrine in the American West

  • Ray Huffaker
Part of the Water Resources Development and Management book series (WRDM)


Water Allocation Return Flow Irrigation Efficiency Irrigation Technology Instream Flow 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

9.6 References

  1. Anderson T, Johnson R (1986) The problem of instream flows. Economic Inquiry 24:535–554Google Scholar
  2. Benson R (1998) Maintaining the status quo: protecting established water uses in the Pacific Northwest despite the role of prior appropriation. Research Publication PO97-1, Northwest Water Law & Policy ProjectGoogle Scholar
  3. Colby B (1990) Transactions costs and efficiency in western water allocation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 72:1184–1192Google Scholar
  4. Dufford W (1994) Water law after Sinking Creek. In: University of Washington (ed) Proceedings of the Sinking Creek decision: water rights in the 21st century, pp A2–A12Google Scholar
  5. Economist (2001) You say potato, I say electricity. July 12, 2001, p 28Google Scholar
  6. Gopalakrishnan C (1973) The doctrine of prior appropriation and its impact on water development: a critical survey. American Journal of Economics & Society 32:61–72Google Scholar
  7. Gould G (1988) Water rights transfers and third-party effects. Land and Water Law Review 23:1–41Google Scholar
  8. Hamilton J, Whittlesey N (1992) Contingent water markets for salmon recovery. (Unpublished working paper, University of Idaho, Department of Agricultural Economics)Google Scholar
  9. Hamilton J, Whittlesey N, Halverson P (1989) Interruptible water markets in the Pacific Northwest. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 71:63–73Google Scholar
  10. Hamilton J, Huffaker R (2003) Conflict in US Irrigation. In: Lascano R, Sojka R (eds) Irrigation of Agricultural Crops Monograph. USDA-ARS, in pressGoogle Scholar
  11. Hanson D (2003) Feds to take on Western water conflicts. The Spokesman-Review. May 3, 2003Google Scholar
  12. Huffaker R, Whittlesey N (2000) The role of prior appropriation in allocating water resources into the 21st century. International Journal of Water Resources Development 16:265–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Huffman J (1983) Instream water use: public and private alternatives. In: Anderson T (ed) Water rights. Pacific Institute, San Francisco, pp 249–282Google Scholar
  14. Hymon S (2002) Klamath’s water is better used downriver, study finds. The Los Angeles Times, November 5, 2002Google Scholar
  15. Johnson G, Sullivan G, Cosgrove D, Schmidt R (1999) Recharge of the Snake River Plain aquifer: transitioning from incidental to managed. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 35:123–131Google Scholar
  16. Milliman J (1959) Water law and private decision making: a critique. Journal of Law and Economics 2:41–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Millstein M (2002a) Top official pledges study of fish die-off. The Oregonian. October 3, 2002Google Scholar
  18. Millstein M (2002b) Klamath diagnosis is a warning for future. The Oregonian. December 19, 2002Google Scholar
  19. Oregon Natural Resources Council (ONRC) (2001) Farmers and conservationists agree on solution for Klamath Basin water crisis, in, June 15, 2001Google Scholar
  20. Pulver R (1988) Liability rules as a solution to the problem of waste in western water law: an economic analysis. California Law Review 76:671, citing US Bureau of Reclamation 1973, Shut Off the Water-The Root Zone is Full: A Study of Irrigation Water UseGoogle Scholar
  21. Rettkowski V, (1993) Department of Ecology, 858 P 2d 232Google Scholar
  22. Stevens J (1980) The public trust: a sovereign’s ancient prerogative becomes the people’s environmental right. University of California Davis Law Review 14:195Google Scholar
  23. The Spokane Spokesman Review (1999) Water suit against agency headed to court. December 4, 1999Google Scholar
  24. Voluntary Settlement Agreement (2002) Benton County Superior Court Cases No. 09-2-82852-7 and 97-2-01041-9. November 20, 2002Google Scholar
  25. Wade J (1982) Efficiency and optimization in irrigation analysis. In: Whittlesey N (ed) Energy and water management in western irrigated agriculture. Westview Press, Boulder, pp 73–100Google Scholar
  26. Wilkinson C (1992) Crossing the next meridian. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  27. Wilkinson C (1991) West’s grand old water doctrine dies. High Country News 23:1–14Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ray Huffaker

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations