Characterising local spatial variation in land cover using geostatistical functions and the discrete wavelet transform

  • C. Lloyd
  • P. Atkinson
  • P. Aplin
Conference paper


Land Cover Local Variance Discrete Wavelet Transform Wavelet Coefficient Land Cover Type 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aplin P, Atkinson PM and Curran PJ (1997) High spatial resolution satellite sensors for the next decade. International Journal of Remote Sensing 18: 3873–3881Google Scholar
  2. Atkinson PM (1997) Selecting the spatial resolution of airborne MSS imagery. International Journal of Remote Sensing 18: 1903–1917Google Scholar
  3. Atkinson PM and Aplin P (2004) Spatial variation in land cover and choice of spatial resolution for remote sensing. International Journal of Remote Sensing 18: 3687–3702Google Scholar
  4. Atkinson PM and Curran PJ (1997) Choosing an appropriate spatial resolution for remote sensing investigations. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 63: 1345–1351Google Scholar
  5. Boggs PT, Donaldson JR, Byrd RH and Schnabel RB (1989) Algorithm 676 ORDPACK: Software for weighted orthogonal distance regression. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software 15: 348–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bruce A and Gao H-Y (1996) Applied Wavelet Analysis with S-Plus. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Burrough PA and McDonnell RA (1998) Principles of Geographical Information Systems. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  8. Castleman KR (1996) Digital Image Processing. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen K and Blong R (2003) Identifying the characteristic scale of scene variation in fine spatial scale resolution imagery with wavelet transform-based sub-image statistics. International Journal of Remote Sensing 24: 1983–1989Google Scholar
  10. Chan AK and Peng C (2003) Wavelets for Sensing Technologies. Artech House: BostonGoogle Scholar
  11. Daubechies I (1988) Orthonormal bases of compactly supported wavelets. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics 41: 909–996Google Scholar
  12. Daubechies I (1992) Ten Lectures on Wavelets. CBMS-NSF Regional Conference Series in Applied Mathematics No. 61. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PennsylvaniaGoogle Scholar
  13. Goovaerts P (1999) Using elevation to aid the geostatistical mapping of rainfall erosivity. Catena 34: 227–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Graps A (1995) An Introduction to Wavelets. IEEE Computational Sciences and Engineering 2: 50–61Google Scholar
  15. Hubbard BB (1998) The World According to Wavelets. Second Edition. A. K. Peters, Natick, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  16. Jupp DLB, Strahler AH, and Woodcock CE (1988) Autocorrelation and regularization in digital images I. Basic theory. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 26: 463–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jupp DLB, Strahler AH, and Woodcock CE (1989) Autocorrelation and regularization in digital images II. Simple image models. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 27: 247–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mallat SG (1989) A theory for multiresolution signal decomposition: the wavelet representation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 11: 674–693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ramstein G and Raffy M (1989) Analysis of the structure of radiometric remotely-sensed images. International Journal of Remote Sensing 10: 1049–1073Google Scholar
  20. Starck JL, Murtagh F and Bijaoui A (1998) Image Processing and Data Analysis: The Multiscale Approach. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  21. Stollnitz EJ, DeRose TD and Salesin DH (1996) Wavelets for Computer Graphics: Theory and Applications. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  22. Van de Wouwer G, Scheunders P and Van Dyck D (1999) Statistical texture characterisation from discrete wavelet representations. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 8: 592–598Google Scholar
  23. Webster R and Oliver MA (1992) Sample adequately to estimate variograms of soil properties, Journal of Soil Science 43: 177–192Google Scholar
  24. Woodcock CE and AH Strahler (1987) The factor of scale in remote sensing. Remote Sensing of Environment 21: 311–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Lloyd
    • 1
  • P. Atkinson
    • 2
  • P. Aplin
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Geography, Queen’s UniversityBelfastUK
  2. 2.School of Geography, University of SouthamptonHighfield, SouthamptonUK
  3. 3.School of Geography, University of NottinghamUniversity Park, NottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations