Research and Development Tax Incentives: a Comparative Analysis of Various National Mechanisms

  • Stéphane Lhuillery


Intellectual Property Right Venture Capital Fund Fiscal Incentive Direct Funding Multivariate Probit Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

8.7 References

  1. AIST/ MITI (1994) Untitled mimeo. Agency of Industrial Science and Technology/Ministry of International Trade and Industry, Tokyo.Google Scholar
  2. ATO (2003) Guide to the R&D Tax Concession. Version 2, November, Australian Taxation Office and AusIndustry.Google Scholar
  3. AusIndustry (2001) Certain Inputs to Manufacture (Items 57 & 60), Policy & Administrative Guidelines. The Australian Customs Service, the Department of Industry Science & Resources and AusIndustry, 26 February.Google Scholar
  4. BIE (1989) The 150% tax concession for research and development expenditure-interim report. Program Evaluation Report 7. AGPS, Canberra.Google Scholar
  5. Devereux, MP, Griffith R, Klemm A (2002) Can international tax competition explain corporate income tax reforms? Economic Policy October: 451–495.Google Scholar
  6. EC (1998) Commission notice on the application of the State aid rules to measures relating to direct business taxation, 10.12.1998, Official Journal of the Commission 384, Luxembourg, p 3.Google Scholar
  7. EC (2002) Corporation tax and innovation: issues at stake and review of European Union experiences in the nineties, by Asesoría Industrial Zabala, S.A., European Economic Development Services, Ltd., Michel Goyhenetche Consultants and MCON Consulting, Innovation papers No. 19, EC, Bruxelles.Google Scholar
  8. EC (2003) Raising E.U. R&D productivity improving the effectiveness of public support mechanisms for private sector research and development: report to the European Commission by an Independent Expert Group. Directorate-General for Research, Bruxelles.Google Scholar
  9. Eisner R, Albert SH, Sullivan M (1984) The new incremental tax credit for R&D: incentive or disincentive? National Tax Journal 37: 243–255.Google Scholar
  10. EVCA (2003) Benchmarking European tax & legal environments: indicators of tax & legal environments favouring the development of private equity and venture capital in European Union member states, European Private Equity and Venture Capital Association, Zaventem, Belgium, March.Google Scholar
  11. Fuke T (1997) The restructuring phase of tax law in Japan. An issue of legitimacy over a more equitable and fairer system towards the 21st century. In: Zhang Y, Fuke T (eds.) Changing tax law in East and South East Asia: towards the 21st century, Kluwer Law International, The Hague Hardbound, pp. 320.Google Scholar
  12. Gourieroux C (2000) Econometrics of qualitative dependent variables. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  13. Guellec D, van Pottelsberg B (2000) The impact of public R&D expenditure on business R&D. Economics of innovation and new technologies 12(3): 225–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hall B, van Reenen J (2000) How effective are fiscal incentives for R&D? A new review of the evidence. Research Policy 29: 449–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hawkins B, Lattimore R (1994) The Australian experience in evaluating the R&D tax concession. Presented at Conference on government recipes for industrial innovation, Vancouver, 20–21 October.Google Scholar
  16. Hines JR (1994) No place like home: tax incentives and the location of R&D by American multinationals, tax policy and the economy. MIT Press Review 8: 65–104.Google Scholar
  17. IFRI (1992) A comparative study on the tax treatment of research and development expenditures. International Fiscal Research Institute.Google Scholar
  18. Kim L (1993) National systems of innovation: dynamics of capability building in Korea. In: R Nelson (ed.) National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis, Oxford University Press: New York, pp. 357–383.Google Scholar
  19. Koga T (2003) Firm size and R&D tax incentives. Technovation 23(7): 643–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mansfield E, Switzer L (1985) The effects of R&D tax credits and allowances in Canada. Research Policy 14: 97–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mansfield E, Romeo A, Switzer L (1983) R&D price indexes and real R&D expenditures in the United States. Research Policy 12: 105–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Maurer SM, Scotchmer S (2003) Procuring knowledge. NBER Working Paper No. 9903, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, New York.Google Scholar
  23. Mohnen P, Mairesse J (1996) Externalités de la R&D et croissance de la producti-vité. OECD STI Review, 18: 39–66.Google Scholar
  24. OECD (1993), Taxation in OECD Countries, OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
  25. OECD (1994) The measurement of scientific and technical activities, “Frascati Manual”. Revised Edition. OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
  26. OECD (1998) Harmful tax competition: an emerging global issue. OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
  27. OECD (2001a) Science, technology and industry outlook-drivers of growth: information technology, innovation and entrepreneurship. OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
  28. OECD (2001b) Competition policy in subsidies and state aid, DAFFE / CLP (2001) 24, November. OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
  29. OECD (2002) Tax incentives for research and development: trends and issues, science and technology industry. directorate for STI, OECD ed., Paris.Google Scholar
  30. OECD (2003a) Main science and technology indicators, Vol. 2003-2 (Complete Edition). OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
  31. OECD (2003b) Tax incentives for research and development: trends and issues. OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
  32. Paff L (2003) Does the alternate incremental credit affect firm R&D?, Technovation 24(1): 41–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pearce R, Singh S (1992) Internationalisation of research and development among the world’s leading enterprises: survey analysis of organisation and motivation, in Granstrand O, Håkanson L, Sjölander S (eds.) Technology management and international business. Wiley, London, pp. 137–179.Google Scholar
  34. Walsh B (2000) The role of tax policy in Ireland’s economic renaissance. Canadian Tax Journal 48(3): 658–673.Google Scholar
  35. Warda J (1994) Canadian R&D tax treatment: an international comparison. Report by the Conference Board of Canada, No. 125-94. The Conference Board of Canada, Ottawa.Google Scholar
  36. Warda J (2001) Measuring the value of R&D tax treatment in OECD countries. OECD STI Review 27: 185–211.Google Scholar
  37. Warda J (2002) A 2001–2002 update of R&D tax treatment in OECD countries. OECD Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry. OECD, Paris.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stéphane Lhuillery
    • 1
  1. 1.BETAStrasbourg

Personalised recommendations