Advertisement

Systems Failure and the Case for Innovation Policy

  • James Stanley Metcalfe

Keywords

Innovation System Innovation Process Market Failure System Failure Private Firm 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

2.8 References

  1. Andersen B, Metcalfe JS, Tether B (1998) Distributed innovation systems as instituted economic processes. In: Metcalfe JS and Miles I (eds.) Innovation systems in the service economy: measurement and case Study analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Amsterdam, pp. 15–42.Google Scholar
  2. Arrow K (1962) Economic welfare and the allocation of resources to invention. In: Nelson R (ed) The rate and direction of inventive activity: economic and social factors. NBER, New York, pp. 609–652.Google Scholar
  3. Arthur WB (2000) Cognition: the black box of economics. In: Colander D (ed) The complexity vision and the teaching of economics. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp. 47–60.Google Scholar
  4. Callon M (1994) Is science a public good? Science, Technology and Human Values 19: 395–424.Google Scholar
  5. Carlsson B (ed.) (1995) Technological systems and economic performance: The case of factory automation. Kluwer-Academic, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  6. Carlsson B (ed.) (1997) Technological systems and industrial dynamics. Kluwer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  7. Carlsson B (2004) Innovation systems: A survey of the literature from a Schumpeterian perspective. Mimeo, Case Western Reserve University: Weatherhead School of Management.Google Scholar
  8. Carlsson B, Jacobsson S, Holmen M, Rickne A (2002) Innovation systems: Analytical and methodological issues. Research Policy 31: 233–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carter C, Williams BR (1957) Industry and Technical Progress. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  10. Cohen WM, Levinthal D (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 128–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cohendet P, Meyer-Kramer F (2001) The theoretical and policy implications of knowledge codification. Research Policy 30: 1563–1591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coombs R, Metcalfe JS (2000) Organizing for innovation: co-ordinating distributed innovation capabilities. In: Foss N, Mahnke V (eds) Competence, governance and entrepreneurship: advances in economic strategy research. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  13. Coombs R, Harvey M, Tether B (2004) Analysing distributed processes of provision and innovation. Industrial and Corporate Change 12(6): 1125–1156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cowen RP, David P, Foray D (2000) The explicit economics of knowledge codification and tacitness. Industrial and Corporate Change 9: 211–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Edquist C (ed.) (1997) Systems of innovation: technologies, institutions and organizations. Pinter, London.Google Scholar
  16. Eliasson G (1998) On the micro foundations of economic growth. In: Lesourne J, Orléan, A (eds), Advances in self-organization and evolutionary economics. Economica, London, pp. 296–307.Google Scholar
  17. Freeman C (1987) Technology policy and economic performance. Pinter, London.Google Scholar
  18. Freeman C (1994) The economics of technical change. Cambridge Journal of Economics 18: 463–514.Google Scholar
  19. Gibbons M, Limoges C, Nowotny H, Schwartzman S, Scott P, Trow M (1994) The new production of knowledge. Sage, London.Google Scholar
  20. Granstrand D, Patel P, Pavitt K (1997) Multi-technology corporations: why they have “distributed” rather than “core” competences. California Management Review 39: 8–25.Google Scholar
  21. Green K, Hull R, Walsh V, McMeekin A (1998) The construction of the techno-economic: networks vs paradigms. CRIC Discussion Paper, No. 17, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
  22. Griliches, Z, (1998) R&D and Productivity: The Econometric Evidence, Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Hicks D (1995) Published papers, tacit competencies and corporate management of the public/private character of knowledge. Industrial and Corporate Change 4: 401–424.Google Scholar
  24. Kodama F (1995) Emerging patterns of innovation. Harvard Business School Press, Boston MA.Google Scholar
  25. Loasby BJ (1999) Knowledge, institutions and evolution in economics. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  26. Lundvall, B-Å (1986) Production innovation and user-producer interaction. Aalborg University Press, Aalborg.Google Scholar
  27. Lundval B-Å (ed.) (1992) National systems of innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. Pinter, London. Not in refsGoogle Scholar
  28. Malerba F, Edquist C, Steinmueller WE (eds) (2004) Sectoral systems of innovation. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Merges RP, Nelson R (1990) On the Complex Economics of Patent Scope, The Columbia Law Review, Vol.90, pp. 839–916.Google Scholar
  30. Metcalfe JS (1995a) The economic foundations of technological policy: equilibrium and evolutionary perspectives. In: Stoneman P (ed.) Handbook of the economics of innovation and technological change. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  31. Metcalfe JS (1995b) Technology systems and technology policy in an evolutionary framework. Cambridge Journal of Economics 19: 25–46.Google Scholar
  32. Metcalfe JS, Georghiou L (1998) Equilibrium and evolutionary foundations of technology policy. OECD Science, Technology Industry Review 22: 75–100.Google Scholar
  33. Mowery DC, Rosenberg N (1989) Technology and the pursuit of economic growth. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.Google Scholar
  34. Narin F, Hamilton KS, Olivastro D (1997) The increasing linkage between US technology and public science. Research Policy 26: 317–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nelson RR (1959) The simple economics of basic scientific research. Journal of Political Economy 67(3): 297–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nelson R (1993) National innovation systems. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  37. Polanyi M (1958) Personal knowledge. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  38. Richardson GB (1961) Information and investment. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  39. Richardson, GB (1972) The organization of industry. Economic Journal 82: 883–893.Google Scholar
  40. Rosenberg N (1990) Why firms do basic research (with their own money). Research Policy 19: 165–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Smith A (1776) An enquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations (Cannan edition 1904). The Modern Library, New York.Google Scholar
  42. Stiglitz JE (1994) Whither socialism Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  43. Tassey G (1992) Technology infrastructure and competitive position. Kluwer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  44. Teubal M (1996) R&D and technology policy in NICs as learning processes. World Development 24: 449–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Varga A (1998) University research and regional innovation. Kluwer Academic, London.Google Scholar
  46. Veugelers R (1997) Internal R&D expenditures and external technology sourcing. Research Policy 26: 303–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Walker W (2000) Entrapment in large technology systems: institutional commitment and power relations. Research Policy 29: 833–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Young A (1928) Increasing returns and economic progress. Economic Journal 38: 527–542.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • James Stanley Metcalfe
    • 1
  1. 1.ESRCManchester

Personalised recommendations