Advertisement

The Organizational Specificities of Brite-Euram Collaborative Projects: Micro-Analysis and Policy Implications

  • Mireille Matt
  • Sandrine Wolff

Keywords

Signalling Strategy Core Competence Interactive Learning Transaction Cost Economic Specific Asset 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

10.6 References

  1. Amesse F, Cohendet P (2001) Technology transfer revisited from the perspective of the knowledge-based economy. Research Policy 30: 1459–1478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ancori B, Bureth A, Cohendet P (2000) The economics of knowledge: the debate about codification and tacit knowledge. Industrial and Corporate Change 9(2): 255–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aoki M (1988) Information, incentives and bargaining in the Japanese economy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  4. Argyris C, Schön DA (1978) Organizational learning: a theory of action perspectives. Addison Wesley, Reading.Google Scholar
  5. Arrow KJ (1962) The economic implication of learning by doing. Review of Economic Studies 26: 155–173.Google Scholar
  6. D’Aspremont C, Jacquemin A (1988) Cooperative and non-cooperative R&D in duopoly with spillovers. American Economic Review 78: 1133–1137.Google Scholar
  7. Avadikyan A, Llerena P, Matt M, Rozan A, Wolff S (2001) Organizational rules, codification and knowledge creation in inter-organization cooperative agreements. Research Policy 30: 1443–1458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bach L, Ledoux MJ, Matt M, Schaeffer V (1995) Evaluation of the economic effects of Brite-Euram programmes on the European Industry. Scientometrics 34(3): 325–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bozeman B, Dietz JS (2001) Strategic research partnerships: constructing policy-relevant indicators. Journal of Technology Transfer 26: 385–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bureth A, Wolff S, Zanfei A (1997) The two faces of learning by cooperating: the evolution and stability of inter-firm agreements in the European electronics industry. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization 32(4): 519–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Butler R, Carney MG (1983) Managing markets: implications for the make-buy decision. Journal of Management Studies 20(2): 213–231.Google Scholar
  12. Child J (1997) Learning trough inter-organizational cooperation. In: Proceedings of EMOT program Conference, Stresa, Italy, 11–14 September.Google Scholar
  13. Ciborra CU (1991) Alliances as learning experiences: cooperation, competition and change in the high-tech industries. In: Mytelka L (ed.) Strategic partnerships and the world economy, Pinter, London, pp. 51–77.Google Scholar
  14. Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1989) Innovation and learning: the two faces of R&D. Economic Journal 99: 569–610.Google Scholar
  15. David PA, Hall BH, Toole AA (2000) Is public R&D a complement or a substitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence. Research Policy 29:497–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. De Bondt R (1997) Spillovers and innovative activities. International Journal of Industrial Organization 15(1): 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dosi G (1988) Sources, procedures and microeconomic effects of innovation. Journal of Economic Literature 26: 1120–1171.Google Scholar
  18. Doz YL (1996) The evolution of cooperation in strategic alliances: initial conditions or learning processes? Strategic Management Journal 17: 55–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Doz YL, Oik PM, Ring PS (2000) Formation processes of R&D consortia: which path to take? Where does it lead? Strategic Management Journal 21: 239–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dyer JH, Singh H (1998) The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review 23(4): 660–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hagedoorn J (2002) Inter-firm R&D partnerships: an overview of major trends and patterns since 1960. Research Policy 31: 77–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hagedoorn J, Schakenraad J (1993) A comparison of private and subsidized R&D partnerships in the European information technology industry. Journal of Common Market Studies 31(3): 373–390.Google Scholar
  23. Hagedoorn J, Schakenraad J (1992) Leading companies and networks of strategic alliances in information technologies. Research Policy 21: 163–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hamel G (1991) Competition for competences and inter-partner learning within international strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal 12(Special Summer Issue): 83–103.Google Scholar
  25. Katz MJ (1986) An analysis of cooperative research and development. RAND Journal of Economics 17: 527–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Katz MJ, Ordover JA (1990) R&D cooperation and competition. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics, pp. 137–203.Google Scholar
  27. Kogut B (1991) Joint ventures and the option to expand and acquire. Management Science 37: 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Koza MP, Lewin AY (1998) The co-evolution of strategic alliances. Organization Sciences 9(3): 255–264.Google Scholar
  29. Kreps DM (1997) The interaction between norms and economic incentives. Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives. American Economic Review 87(2):359–364.Google Scholar
  30. Larsson RL, Bengtsson L, Henriksson K, Sparks J (1998) The interorganizational learning dilemma: collective knowledge development in strategic alliances. Organization Sciences 9(3): 285–305.Google Scholar
  31. Llerena P, Matt M (1999) Inter-organizational collaboration: the theories and then-policy implications. In: Gambardella A, Malerba F (eds.) The organization of economic innovation in Europe. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 179–201.Google Scholar
  32. Link AN, Paton D, Siegel DS (2002) An analysis of policy initiatives to promote strategic research partnerships. Research Policy 3: 1459–1466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lundvall BA (1988) Innovation as an interactive process: from user-producer interaction in the national systems of innovation. In: Dosi G, Freeman C, Nelson R, Silverberg G, Soete L (eds.), Technical change and economic theory, Pinter Publishers, London, pp. 349–369.Google Scholar
  34. Macneil IR (1974) The many futures of contract. Southern California Law Review 47: 691–816.Google Scholar
  35. Malerba F (1992) Learning by firms and incremental technical change. The Economic Journal 102: 845–859.Google Scholar
  36. March JG (1991) Exploration vs. exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science 2(1): 71–87.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  37. March JG, Simon H (1993) Organizations revisited. Industrial and Corporate Change 2(3): 299–316.Google Scholar
  38. Mariti P, Smiley R (1983) Cooperative agreements and the organization of industry, Journal of Industrial Economics 4: 437–451.Google Scholar
  39. Matt M, Wolff S (forthcoming 2004) Incentives, coordination and learning in government-sponsored vs. spontaneous inter-firm research cooperation, International Journal of Technology Management.Google Scholar
  40. Metcalfe S (1995) The economics foundations of economic policy: equilibrium and evolutionary perspectives. In: Stoneman P (ed.) Handbook of the economics of innovation and technological change. Blackwell Handbooks in Economics, Oxford UK and Cambridge USA, pp. 409–512.Google Scholar
  41. Ouchi WG (1980) Markets, bureaucracies and clans. Administrative Science Quarterly 20: 129–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Palay TM (1984) Comparative institutional economics: the governance of rail freight contracting. Journal of Legal Studies 13 (June): 265–288.Google Scholar
  43. Parkhe A (1991) Interfirm diversity, organizational learning, and longevity in global strategic alliances. Journal of International Business Studies 22: 579–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Picard P, Rey P (1988) Recherche-Développement, Incitation et Coopération. In: Mélanges économiques, Essai en l’honneur de Edmond Malinvaud, EHESS, Economica, Paris, pp. 315–342.Google Scholar
  45. Prahalad CK, Hamel G (1990) The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review 68 (May/June): 79–91.Google Scholar
  46. Powell WW, Koput KW, Smith-Doerr L (1996) Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly 41: 116–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Richardson GB (1972) The organization of industry. Economic Journal 82: 883–896.Google Scholar
  48. Ring PS, Van de Ven AH (1994) Developmental processes in cooperative interorganizational relationships. Academy of Management Review 19: 90–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rosenberg N (1982) Inside the black box. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  50. Sakakibara M (1997a) Heterogeneity of firm capabilities and cooperative research and development: an empirical examination of motives. Strategic Management Journal 18: 143–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sakakibara M (1997b) Evaluating government-sponsored R&D consortia in Japan: who benefits and how? Research Policy 26: 447–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sakakibara M (2003) Knowledge sharing in cooperative research and development. Managerial and Decision Economics 24: 117–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sakakibara M, Brandstetter L (2003) Measuring the impact of US research consortia. Managerial and Decision Economics 24: 51–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Salant SW, Shaffer G (1998) Optimal asymmetric strategies in research joint venture. International Journal of Industrial Organization 16: 195–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Suzumura K (1992) Cooperative and non-cooperative R&D in an oligopoly with spillovers. American Economic Review 82: 1307–1320.Google Scholar
  56. Teece DJ (1992) Competition, cooperation and innovation: organizational arrangements for regimes of rapid technological progress. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization 18: 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Teece DJ (1986) Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy 15: 285–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tripsas M, Schrader S, Sobrero M (1995) Discouraging opportunistic behavior in collaborative R&D: a new role for government. Research Policy 24: 367–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Vonortas NS (2000) Multimarket contact and inter-firm cooperation in R&D. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 10: 243–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Williamson OE (1989) Transaction cost economics. In: Schmalensee R, Willig RD (eds.) Handbook of industrial organization Vol. 1. New York, North Holland, pp. 136–182.Google Scholar
  61. Williamson O E (1985) The economic institutions of capitalism. Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  62. Williamson OE (1979) Transaction costs economics: the governance of contractual relations. Journal of Law and Economics 22(2): 233–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wolff S (1992) Accords inter-entreprises et flexibilité: elements théoriques et application au secteur des telecommunications, PhD Thesis, Université Louis Pasteur, Strasbourg.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mireille Matt
    • 1
  • Sandrine Wolff
    • 1
  1. 1.BETAStrasbourg

Personalised recommendations