Advertisement

Measuring Contrast Agent Concentration in T1-Weighted Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI

  • 1David L. Buckley
  • Geoffrey J. M. Parker
Part of the Medical Radiology book series (MEDRAD)

Keywords

Contrast Agent Water Exchange Flip Angle Magn Reson Image Arterial Input Function 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barsky D, Putz B, Schulten K (1997) Theory of heterogeneous relaxation in compartmentalized tissues. Magn Reson Med 37:666–675PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bluml S, Schad LR, Stepanow B, Lorenz WJ (1993) Spin-lattice relaxation-time measurement by means of a turboFLASH technique. Magn Reson Med, 30:289–295PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Boetes C, Barentsz JO, Mus RD, van der Sluis RF, van Erning LJ, Hendriks JH, Holland R, Ruys SH (1994) MR characterization of suspicious breast lesions with a gadolinium-enhanced turboFLASH subtraction technique. Radiology 193:777–781PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Brookes JA, Redpath TW, Gilbert FJ, Murray AD, Staff RT (1999) Accuracy of T1 measurement in dynamic contrastenhanced breast MRI using two-and three-dimensional variable flip angle fast low-angle shot. J Magn Reson Imaging 9:163–171CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Buckley DL (2002) Uncertainty in the analysis of tracer kinetics using dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI. Magn Reson Med 47:601–606CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Calamante F, Gadian DG, Connelly A (2000) Delay and dispersion effects in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI: simulations using singular value decomposition. Magn Reson Med 44:464–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Checkley D, Tessier JJ, Wedge SR, Dukes M, Kendrew J, Curry B, Middleton B, Waterton JC (2003) Dynamic contrastenhanced MRI of vascular changes induced by the VEGF-signalling inhibitor ZD4190 in human tumour xenografts. Magn Reson Imaging 21:475–482Google Scholar
  8. Cron GO, Santyr G, Kelcz F (1999) Accurate and rapid quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging using spoiled gradient-recalled echoes and bookend T-1 measurements. Magn Reson Med 42:746–753CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Donahue KM, Burstein D, Manning WJ, Gray ML (1994) Studies of Gd-DTPA relaxivity and proton-exchange rates in tissue. Magn Reson Med 32:66–76PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Donahue KM, Weisskoff RM, Chesler DA, Kwong KK, Bogdanov AA Jr, Mandeville JB, Rosen BR (1996) Improving MR quantification of regional blood volume with intravascular T1 contrast agents: accuracy, precision, and water exchange. Magn Reson Med 36:858–867PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Donahue KM, Weisskoff RM, Burstein D (1997) Water diffusion and exchange as they influence contrast enhancement. J Magn Reson Imaging 7:102–110PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Engelstad BL, Wolf GL (1988) Contrast agents. In: Stark DD, Bradley WG Jr (eds) Magnetic resonance imaging. Mosby, St Louis, pp 161–181Google Scholar
  13. Evelhoch JL (1999) Key factors in the acquisition of contrast kinetic data for oncology. J Magn Reson Imaging 10:254–259CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Fram EK, Herfkens RJ, Johnson GA, Glover GH, Karis JP, Shimakawa A, Perkins TG, Pelc NJ (1987) Rapid calculation of T1 using variable flip angle gradient refocused imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 5:201–208CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Freeman A, Gowland P, Jellineck D, Wilcock D, Firth J, Worthington B, Mansfield P, Ratcliffe G (1994) Gd uptake in brain tumours: application of fast T1 mapping using LL_EPI (abstract). Proceedings of the Society of Magnetic Resonance, San Francisco, CA p 863Google Scholar
  16. Fritz-Hansen T, Rostrup E, Larsson HB, Sondergaard L, Ring P, Henriksen O (1996) Measurement of the arterial concentration of Gd-DTPA using MRI: a step toward quantitative perfusion imaging. Magn Reson Med 36:225–231PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Gowland P, Mansfield P (1993) Accurate measurement of T(1) in-vivo in less-than 3 seconds using echo-planar imaging. Magn Reson Med 30:351–354PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Gowland P, Mansfield P, Bullock P, Stehling M, Worthington B, Firth J (1992) Dynamic studies of gadolinium uptake in brain tumors using inversion-recovery echo-planar imaging. Magn Reson Med 26:241–258PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Haase A, Frahm J, Matthaei D, Hanicke W, Merboldt KD (1986) FLASH imaging-rapid NMR imaging using low flip-angle pulses. J Magn Reson 67:258–266Google Scholar
  20. Hayes C, Padhani AR, Leach MO (2002) Assessing changes in tumour vascular function using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. NMR Biomed 15:154–163CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Hazlewood CF, Chang DC, Nichols BL, Woessner DE (1974) Nuclear magnetic resonance transverse relaxation times of water protons in skeletal muscle. Biophys J 14:583–606PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Henderson E, Rutt BK, Lee TY (1998) Temporal sampling requirements for the tracer kinetics modeling of breast disease. Magn Reson Imaging 16:1057–1073PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Heywang SH, Wolf A, Pruss E, Hilbertz T, Eiermann W, Permanetter W (1989) MR imaging of the breast with Gd-DTPA: use and limitations. Radiology 171:95–103PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Hittmair K, Gomiscek G, Langenberger K, Recht M, Imhof H, Kramer J (1994) Method for the quantitative assessment of contrast agent uptake in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Magn Reson Med 31:567–571PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Judd RM, Atalay MK, Rottman GA, Zerhouni EA (1995) Effects of myocardial water exchange on T1 enhancement during bolus administration of MR contrast agents. Magn Reson Med 33:215–223PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Judd RM, Reeder SB, May-Newman K (1999) Effects of water exchange on the measurement of myocardial perfusion using paramagnetic contrast agents. Magn Reson Med 41:334–342CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Landis CS, Li X, Telang FW, Molina PE, Palyka I, Vetek G, Springer CS (1999) Equilibrium transcytolemmal water-exchange kinetics in skeletal muscle in vivo. Magn Reson Med 42:467–478CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Landis CS, Li X, Telang FW, Coderre JA, Micca PL, Rooney WD, Latour LL, Vetek G, Palyka I, Springer CS (2000) Determination of the MRI contrast agent concentration time course in vivo following bolus injection: effect of equilibrium transcytolemmal water exchange. Magn Reson Med 44:563–574PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Larsson HBW, Stubgaard M, Frederiksen JL, Jensen M, Henriksen O, Paulson OB (1990) Quantitation of blood-brain barrier defect by magnetic resonance imaging and gadolinium-DTPA in patients with multiple sclerosis and brain tumors. Magn Reson Med 16:117–131PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Larsson HBW, Rosenbaum S, Fritz-Hansen T (2001) Quantification of the effect of water exchange in dynamic contrast MRI perfusion measurements in the brain and heart. Magn Reson Med 46:272–281CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Li KL, Zhu XP, Waterton J, Jackson A (2000) Improved 3D quantitative mapping of blood volume and endothelial permeability in brain tumors. J Magn Reson Imaging 12:347–357CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Mussurakis S, Buckley DL, Drew PJ, Fox JN, Carleton PJ, Turnbull LW, Horsman A (1997) Dynamic MR imaging of the breast combined with analysis of contrast agent kinetics in the differentiation of primary breast tumours. Clin Radiol 52:516–526PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Mussurakis S, Gibbs P, Horsman A (1998) Peripheral enhancement and spatial contrast uptake heterogeneity of primary breast tumours: quantitative assessment with dynamic MRI. J Comput Assist Tomogr 22:35–46PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Parker GJ, Suckling J, Tanner SF, Padhani AR, Revell PB, Husband JE, Leach MO (1997) Probing tumor microvascularity by measurement, analysis and display of contrast agent uptake kinetics. J Magn Reson Imaging 7:564–574PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Parker GJ, Baustert I, Tanner SF, Leach MO (2000) Improving image quality and T-1 measurements using saturation recovery turboFLASH with an approximate K-space normalisation filter. Magn Reson Imaging 18:157–167CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Parker GJ, Barker GJ, Tofts PS (2001) Accurate multislice gradient echo T(1) measurement in the presence of non-ideal RF pulse shape and RF field nonuniformity. Magn Reson Med 45:838–845CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Parker GJ, Jackson A, Waterton JC, Buckley DL (2003) Automated arterial input function extraction for T1-weighted DCE-MRI (abstract). Proc ISMRM 11th annual meeting, Toronto, Canada, p 1264Google Scholar
  38. Pedevilla M, Stollberger R, Schmidt F, Wach P, Ebner F (1995) Comparison of various methods used for breast tumor characterization in Gd-DTPA enhanced MR imaging (abstract). Proc Society of Magnetic Resonance, Nice, France, p 1600Google Scholar
  39. Pfeuffer J, Flogel U, Dreher W, Leibfritz D (1998) Restricted diffusion and exchange of intracellular water: theoretical modelling and diffusion time dependence of H-1 NMR measurements on perfused glial cells. NMR Biomed 11:19–31CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Pirkle JL, Ashley DL, Goldstein JH (1979) Pulse nuclear magnetic resonance measurements of water exchange across the erythrocyte membrane employing a low Mn concentration. Biophys J 25:389–406PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Quirk JD, Bretthorst GL, Duong TQ, Snyder AZ, Springer CS, Ackerman JJH, Neil JJ (2003) Equilibrium water exchange between the intra-and extracellular spaces of mammalian brain. Magn Reson Med 50:493–499CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Rijpkema M, Kaanders J, Joosten FBM, van der Kogel AJ, Heerschap A (2001) Method for quantitative mapping of dynamic MRI contrast agent uptake in human tumors. J Magn Reson Imaging 14:457–463CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Rosen BR, Belliveau JW, Vevea JM, Brady TJ (1990) Perfusion imaging with NMR contrast agents. Magn Reson Med 14:249–265PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Shames DM, Kuwatsuru R, Vexler V, Muhler A, Brasch RC (1993) Measurement of capillary-permeability to macromolecules by dynamic magnetic resonance imaging: a quantitative noninvasive technique. Magn Reson Med 29:616–622PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Springer CS Jr (1994) Physiochemical principles influencing magnetopharmaceuticals. In: Gillies RJ (ed) NMR in physiology and biomedicine. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 75–100Google Scholar
  46. Stanisz GJ, Henkelman RM (2000) Gd-DTPA relaxivity depends on macromolecular content. Magn Reson Med 44:665–667CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Terada T, Nambu K, Hyotani G, Miyamoto K, Tsuura M, Nakamura Y, Nishiguchi T, Itakura T, Hayashi S, Komai N (1992) A method for quantitative measurement of cerebral vascular-permeability using X-ray CT and iodinated contrastmedium. Neuroradiology 34:290–296CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Tofts PS, Kermode AG (1991) Measurement of the blood-brain barrier permeability and leakage space using dynamic MR imaging. 1. Fundamental concepts. Magn Reson Med 17:357–367PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Tong CY, Prato FS (1994) A novel fast T1-mapping method. J Magn Reson Imaging 4:701–708PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Vallee JP, Ivancevic M, Lazeyras F, Kasuboski L, Chatelain P, Righetti A, Didier D (2003) Use of high flip angle in T1-prepared FAST sequences for myocardial perfusion quantification. Eur Radiol 13:507–514PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Wang HZ, Riederer SJ, Lee JN (1987) Optimizing the precision in T1 relaxation estimation using limited flip angles. Magn Reson Med 5:399–416PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Wedeking P, Sotak CH, Telser J, Kumar K, Chang CA, Tweedle MF (1992) Quantitative dependence of MR signal intensity on tissue concentration of Gd(HP-DO3A) in the nephrectomized rat. Magn Reson Imaging 10:97–108CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Yankeelov TE, Rooney WD, Li X, Springer CS (2003) Variation of the relaxographic „shutter-speed“ for transcytolemmal water exchange affects the CR bolus-tracking curve shape. Magn Reson Med 50:1151–1169CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Zhu XP, Li KL, Kamaly-Asl ID, Checkley DR, Tessier JJ, Waterton JC, Jackson A (2000) Quantification of endothelial permeability, leakage space, and blood volume in brain tumors using combined T1 and T2* contrast-enhanced dynamic MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 11:575–585CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • 1David L. Buckley
  • Geoffrey J. M. Parker
    • 1
  1. 1.Imaging Science and Biomedical EngineeringUniversity of ManchesterManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations