Fetal Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Central Nervous System

  • Nadine Girard
  • Thierry A. G. M. Huisman


Fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) represents a noninvasive imaging technique that allows a detailed visualization of the fetus in utero as well as of the maternal structures, including the birth canal. Until recently, the long acquisition times of conventional MRI sequences prohibited detailed studies of the fetal anatomy due to motion artifacts. However, fetal motion artifacts can be successfully suppressed or minimized by shortening the acquisition time (Fig. 27.1). The ongoing development of ultrafast MRI scanners and sequences, currently with acquisition times shorter than 400 ms per slice, allows to “picture-freeze” the fetus during motion. A variety of ultrafast sequences are available, including echoplanar, half-Fourier single-shot fast spin-echo and fast gradient-echo sequences. Similar to standard spin-echo sequences, T1- and T2-weighted images can be obtained.


Posterior Fossa Fetal Brain Fetal Motion Bright Signal Fetal Magnetic Resonance Image 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Smith FW, Adam AH, Phillips WDP. NMR Imaging in pregnancy. Lancet 1983; 1:61–62.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Foster MA, Knight CH, Rimmington JE, Mallard JR. Fetal imaging by nuclear magnetic resonance: a study in goats. Radiology 1983; 149:193–195.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Johnson IR, Symonds EM, Kean DM, Worthington BS, Broughton Pipkin F, Hawkes RC, Gyngell M. Imaging the pregnant human uterus with nuclear magnetic resonance. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 148:1136–1139.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Daffos F, Forestier F, Mac Aleese J, Aufrant C, Mandelbrot L, Cabanis EA, Iba-Zizen MT, Alfonso JM, Tamraz J. Fetal curarization for prenatal magnetic resonance imaging. Prenat Diagn 1988; 8:312–314.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lenke R, Persutte W, Nemes J. Use of pancuronium bromide to inhibit fetal movement during magnetic resonance imaging. J Reprod Med 1989; 34:315–317.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Weinreb JC, Lowe T, Cohen JM, Kutler M. Human fetal anatomy: MR Imaging. Radiology 1985; 157:715–720.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Williamson RA, Weiner CP, Yuh WTC, Abu-Yousef MM. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of anomalous fetuses. Obstet Gynecol 1989; 73:952–956.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Girard N, Raybaud C, D’Ercole C, Boubli L, Chau C, Cahen S, Potier A, Gamerre M. In vivo MR imaging of the fetal brain. Neuroradiology 1993; 35:431–436.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sadovsky E, Mahler Y, Polishuk WZ, Malkin A. Correlation between electromagnetic recording and maternal assessment of fetal movement. Lancet 1973; 1:1141–1143.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Birger M, Homburg R, Insler V. Clinical evaluation of fetal movements. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1980; 18:377–382.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yeh SY, Paul RH, Cordero L, Hon EH. A study of diazepam during labor. Obstet Gynecol 1974; 43:363–373.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lean TH, Rafnam SS, Sivasamboo R. Use of benzodiazepines in the management of eclampsia. J Obstet Gynaec Br Commonw 1968; 75:856–862.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rocker I, Laurence RM (eds) Fetoscopy. New York: Elsevier/North Holland, 1981.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kanfo JH. Use of benzodiazepines during pregnancy, labour and lactation, with particular reference to pharmakokinetic considerations. Drugs 1982; 23:354–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rosenberg L, Mitchell AA, Parsells JL, Pashayan H, Louin C, Shapiro S. Lack of relation of oral clefts to diazepam use during pregnancy. N Engl J Med 1983; 309:1281–1285.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Girard NJ, Raybaud CA. In vivo MRI of fetal brain cellular migration. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1992; 16:265–267.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Girard N, Raybaud C, Poncet M. In vivo MRI study of brain maturation in normal fetuses. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1995; 16:407–413.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tsuchiya K, Katase S, Seki T, Mizutani Y, Hachiya J. Short communication: MR imaging of fetal brain abnormalities using a HASTE sequence. Br J Radiol 1996; 69:668–670.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Levine D, Hatabu H, Gaa J, Atkinson MW, Edelman RR. Fetal anatomy revealed with fast MR sequences. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996; 167:905–908.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yamashita Y, Namimoto T, Abe Y, Takahashi M, Iwamasa J, Miyazaki K, Okamura H. MR imaging of the fetus by a HASTE sequence. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 168:513–519.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Levine D, Edelman RR. Fast MRI and its application in obstetrics. Abdom Imaging 1997; 22:589–596.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Levine D, Barnes PD, Sher S, Semelka RC, Li W, McArdle CR, Worawattanakul S, Edelman RR. Fetal fast MR imaging: reproducibility, technical quality, and conspicuity of anatomy. Radiology 1998; 206:549–554.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Levine D, Barnes PD, Edelman RR. Obstetric MR imaging. Radiology 1999; 211:609–617.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hubbard AM, Harty MP, States LJ. A new tool for prenatal diagnosis: Ultrafast Fetal MRI. Semin Perinatol 1999; 23:437–447.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sonigo P, Rypens F, Carteret M, Delezoide A, Brunelle F. MR imaging of fetal cerebral anomalies. Pediatr Radiol 1998; 28:212–222.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Garel C, Brisse H, Sebag G, Elmaleh M, Oury J, Hassan M. Magnetic resonance imaging of the fetus. Pediatr Radiol 1998; 28:201–211.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gicquel JM, Potier A, Sitruk S, Girard N. Normal outcome after prenatal diagnosis of thrombosis of the torcular Herophili. Prenat Diagn 2000; 20:824–827.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Girard NJ, Raybaud CA. Ventriculomegaly and pericerebral CSF collection in the fetus: early stage of benign external hydrocephalus? Childs Nerv Syst 2001; 17:239–245.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Girard N, Raybaud C, Gambarelli D, Figarella-Branger D. Fetal brain MR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2001; 9:19–56.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Girard N, Gambarelli D. Normal fetal brain. Magnetic resonance imaging. An atlas with anatomic correlations. Brunelle F, Shaw D, Rickmansworth, UK, 2001.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    McCarthy S, Filly R, Stark D, Hricak H., Brant-Zawadzki M, Callen P. Obstetrical magnetic resonance imaging: fetal anatomy. Radiology 1998; 206:549–554.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Stazzone MM, Hubbard AM, Bilaniuk LT, Harty MP, Meyer JS, Zimmerman RA, Mahboubi S. Ultrafast MR Imaging of the normal posterior fossa in fetuses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000; 175:835–839.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Chong B, Babcook C, Salamat M, Nemzek W, Kroeker D, Ellis W. A magnetic resonance template for normal neuronal migration in the fetus. Neurosurgery 1996; 39:110–116.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Girard N, Raybaud C, Gambarelli D. Pediatric neuroimaging: fetal MR imaging. In: Demaerel P (ed) Recent Advances in Diagnostic Neuroradiology. Berlin: Springer, 2001:325–346.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Mansfield P, Stehling MK, Ordidge RJ, Coxon R, Chapman B, Blamire A, Gibbs P, Johnson IR, Symonds EM, Worthington BS, et al. Echo planar imaging of the human fetus in utero at 0.5 T. Br J Radiol 1990; 63:833–841.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Heerschap A, van den Berg PP. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of human fetal brain. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 170:1150–1151.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kok RD, van den Bergh AJ, Heerschap A, Nijland R, van den Berg PP. Metabolic information from the human fetal brain obtained with proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001; 185:1011–1015.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kok RD, van den Berg PP, van den Bergh AJ, Nijland R, Heerschap A. Maturation of the human fetal brain as observed by 1H MR spectroscopy. Magn Reson Med 2002; 48:611–616.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Shellock FG, Kanal E. Bioeffects and safety of MR procedures. In: Edelman RR, Hesselink JR, Zlatkin MB (eds) Clinical Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2nd edn. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1996:429.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Berlex laboratories: Magnevist product information. Wayne, NJ, Berlex Laboratories, 1994.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Shellock FG, Kanal E. Policies, guidelines, and recommendations for MR imaging, safety and patient management: SMRI safety committee. J Magn Reson Imaging 1991; 1:97–101.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for content and review of a magnetic resonance diagnostic device 510 (k) application. Washington D.C.: U.S. Food and Drug Administration, August 2, 1988.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Schwartz J, Crooks L. NMR imaging produces no observable mutations or cytotoxicity in mammalian cells. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1982; 139:583–585.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Wolff S, Crooks L, Brown P, Howard R, Painter R. Tests for DNA and chromosomal damage induced by nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. Radiology 1980; 136:707–710.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Elster AD. Does MR imaging have any known effects on the developing fetus? Do you scan pregnant patients? Do you have any recommendations? AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994; 162:1493.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Kanal E, Gillen J, Evans J, Savitz D, Shellock F. Survey of reproductive health among female MR workers. Radiology 1993; 187:395–399.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Baker P, Johnson I, Harvey P, Mansfield P. A three-year follow-up of children imaged in utero using echo-planar magnetic resonance. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 170:32–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Myers C, Duncan KR, Gowland PA, Johnson IR, Baker PN. Failure to detect intrauterine growth restriction following in utero exposure to MRI. Br J Radiol 1998; 71:549–551.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Heinrichs WL, Fong P, Flannery M, Heinrichs SC, Crooks LE, Spindle A, Pedersen RA. Midgestational exposure of pregnant BALB/c mice to magnetic resonance imaging conditions. Magn Reson Imaging 1988; 6:305–313.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Cooke P, Morris PG. The effects of NMR exposure on living organisms. II. A genetic study of human lymphocytes. Br J Radiol 1981; 54:622–625.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Thomas A, Morris PG. The effects of NMR exposure on living organisms. I. A microbial assay. Br J Radiol 1981; 54:615–621.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Wolff S, Crooks LE, Brown P, Howard R, Painter RB. Test for DNA and chromosomal damage induced by nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. Body computed tomography and NMR. Radiology 1980; 136:707–710.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Kale PG, Baum JW. Genetic effects of strong magnetic fields in drosophila melanogaster. III. Combined treatment with homogeneous field and gaseous DBCP. Mutation Res 1982; 105:79–83CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    van der Knaap MS, Valk J. Magnetic Resonance of Myelin, Myelination and Myelin Disorders, 2nd edn. Berlin: Springer, 1995.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Girard N, Raybaud C, DuLac P. MRI study of brain myelination. J Neuroradiol 1991; 18:291–307PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Martin E, Kikinis R, Zuerrer M, Boesch C, Briner J, Kewitz G, Kaelin P. Developmental stages of human brain: an MR study. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1988; 12:917–922.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Yakovlev PI. Morphological criteria of growth maturation of the nervous system in man. In: Kolb LC, Masland RL, Cooke RE (eds) “Mental retardation”: Association for Research into Nervous and Mental Diseases. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1962:1–46.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Yakovlev PI, Lecours A. The myelinogenetic cycles of regional maturation of the brain. In: Minkowski A (ed) Regional Development of the Brain in Early Life. Oxford: Blackwell, 1967:3–70.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Berry M. Neurogenesis and gliogenesis in the human brain. Food Chem Toxic 1986; 24:79–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Fees-Higgins A, Larroche J eds) Development of the Human Fetal Brain. An Anatomical Atlas. Paris: Masson, 1987:1–125.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Levine D, Barnes PD. Cortical maturation in normal and abnormal fetuses as assessed with prenatal MR imaging. Radiology 1999; 210:751–758.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Barkovich AJ. Pediatric Neuroimaging, 3rd edn. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2000.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    McIntosh R, Merritt KK, Richards MR. The incidence of congenital anomalies. A study of 5,964 pregnancies. Pediatrics 1954; 14:505–510.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Myrianthopoulos NC. Epidemiology of central nervous system malformations. In: Vinken PJ, Bruyn GW (eds) Handbook of Clinical Neurology. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1977:139–171.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Butcher HC, Schmidt JG. Does routine ultrasound scanning improve outcome in pregnancy ? Meta-analysis of various outcome measures. BMJ 1993; 307:13–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Pilu G, Perolo A, Falco P, Visentin A, Gabrielli S, Bovicelli L. Ultrasound of the fetal central nervous system. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2000; 12:93–103.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Witters I, Fryns JP. Prenatal diagnosis of central nervous system abnormalities: Diagnostic possibilities and limitations of fetal neurosonography. Genet Couns 2000; 11:3–11.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Kurjak A, Hafner T, Kos M, Kupesic S, Stanojevic M. Threedimensional sonography in prenatal diagnosis: a luxury or necessity? J Perinat Med 2000; 28:194–209.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Blaas HG, Eik-Nes SH, Berg S, Torp H. In vivo three dimensional ultrasound reconstructions of embryos and early fetuses. Lancet 1998; 352:1182–1186.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Reiss I, Gortner L, Moller J, Gehl H, Baschat A, Grembruch U. Fetal intracerebral hemorrhage in the second trimester: diagnosis by sonography and magnetic resonance imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996; 7:49–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Greco P, Resta M, Vimercati A, Dicuonzo F, Loverro G, Vicino M, Selvaggi L. Antenatal diagnosis of isolated lissenchephaly by ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998; 12:276–279.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Levine D, Barnes PD, Madsen JR, Abbot J, Tejas Mehta T, Edelman R. Central nervous system abnormalities assessed with prenatal magnetic resonance. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 94:1011–1019.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Levine D, Barnes PD, Edelman R. State of the art: obstetric MR imaging. Radiology 1999; 211:609–617.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Levine D, Barnes PD, Madsen JR, Li W, Edelman RR. Fetal central nervous system anomalies: MR imaging augments sonographic diagnosis. Radiology 1997; 204:635–642.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Levine D, Barnes PD, Madsen JR, Abbott J, Wong GP, Hulka C, Mehta T, Li W, Edelman RR. Fetal CNS anomalies revealed on ultrafast MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 172:813–818.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Cardoza J, Goldstein R, Filly R. Exclusion of fetal ventriculomegaly with a single measurement: the width of the lateral ventricular atrium. Radiology 1988; 169:711–714.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Nicolaides K, Berry S, Snijders R, Thorpe-Beeston J, Gosden C. Fetal lateral cerebral ventriculomegaly: Associated malformations and chromosomal defects. Fetal Diagn Ther 1990; 5:5–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Nyberg D, Mack L, Hirsch J, Pagon R, Shepard T. Fetal hydrocephalus: sonographic detection and clinical significance of associated anomalies. Radiology 1987; 163:187–191.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Pretorius D, Davis K, Manco-Johnson M, Manchester D, Meier P, Clewell W. Clinical course of fetal hydrocephalus: 40 cases. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1985; 144:827–831.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Goldstein R, Lapidus A, Filly R, Cardoza J. Mild lateral cerebral ventricular dilatation in utero: clinical significance and prognosis. Radiology 1990; 176:237–242.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Vergani P, Locatelli A, Strobelt N, Cavallone M, Ceruti P, Paterlini G, Ghidini A. Clinical outcome of mild fetal ventriculomegaly. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 178:218–222.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Twining P, Jaspan T, Zuccollo. The outcome of fetal ventriculomegaly. Br J Radiol 1994; 67:26–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Patel M, Filly A, Hersh D, Goldstein R. isolated mild fetal cerebral ventriculomegaly: clinical course and outcome. Radiology 1994; 192:759–764.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Bloom SL, Bloom DD, Dellanebbia C, Martin LB, Lucas MJ, Twickler DM. The developmental outcome of children with antenatal mild isolated ventriculomegaly. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 90:93–97.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Bromley B, Frigoletto FD, Benacerraf BR. Mild fetal lateral cerebral ventriculomegaly: clinical course and outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 164:863–867.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Pilu G, Falco P, Gabrielli S, Perolo A, Sandri F, Bovicelli L. The clinical significance of fetal isolated cerebral borderline ventriculomegaly: report of 31 cases and review of the literature. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999; 14:320–326.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Lipitz S, Yagel S, Malinger G, Meizner I, Zalel Y, Achiron R. Outcome of fetuses with isolated borderline unilateral ventriculomegaly diagnosed at mid-gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998; 12:23–26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Laing F, Frates M, Brown D, Benson C, DiSalvo D, Doubilet P. Sonography of the fetal posterior fossa: false appearance of mega-cisterna magna and Dandy-Walker variant. Radiology 1994; 192:247–251.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Girard N, Raybaud C, D’Ercole C, Boubli L, Chau C, Cahen S, Potier A, Gamerre M. Prenatal diagnosis of fetal cerebral abnormalities by ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1993; 50: 177–184.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    D’Ercole C, Girard N, Cravello L, Boubli L, Potier A, Raybaud C, Blanc B. Prenatal diagnosis of fetal corpus callosum agenesis by ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging. Prenat Diagn 1998; 18:247–253.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Okamura K, Murotsuki J, Sakai T, Matsumoto K, Shirane R, Yajima A. Prenatal diagnosis of lissencephaly by magnetic resonance imaging. Fetal Diagn Ther 1993; 8:56–59.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Rypens F, Sonigo P, Aubry MC, Delezoide AL, Cessot F, Brunelle F. Prenatal diagnosis of a thick corpus callosum. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1995; 17:1918–1920.Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Sarnat HB. Ependymal reactions to injury. A review. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 1995; 54:1–15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Filly R. Ultrasound Evaluation of the Fetal Neural Axis. In: Callen P (ed) Ultrasonography in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1994:189–234.Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Meizner I. Fetal skeletal malformations revisited: steps in the diagnostic approach. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1997; 10:303–306.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Nakahara T, Uozumi T, Monden S, Muttaqin Z, Kurisu K, Arita K, Kuwabara S, Ohama K, Kumagai M, Nakahara K. Prenatal diagnosis of open spina bifida by MRI and ultrasonography. Brain Dev 1993; 15:75–78.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Kitano Y, Flake AW, Crombleholme TM, Johnson MP, Adzick NS. Open fetal surgery for life-threatening fetal malformations. Semin Perinatol 1999; 23:448–461.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nadine Girard
    • 1
  • Thierry A. G. M. Huisman
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Radiology Hospital NordUniversité de la MéditerranéeMarseilleFrance
  2. 2.Department of Diagnostic Imaging Radiology and NeuroradiologyUniversity Children’s Hospital ZurichZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations