The axial form factor of the nucleon

  • Elizabeth Beise
Conference paper


The parity violation programs at MIT-Bates, Jefferson Lab and Mainz are presently focused on developing a better understanding of the sea-quark contributions to the vector matrix elements of nucleon structure. The success of these programs will allow precise semi-leptonic tests of the Standard Model such as that planned by the QWeak collaboration. In order to determine the vector matrix elements, a good understanding of the nucleon’s axial vector form factor as seen by an electron, G A e , is also required. While the vector electroweak form factors provide information about the nucleon’s charge and magnetism, the axial form factor is related to the nucleon’s spin. Its Q 2 = 0 value at leading order, g a, is well known from nucleon and nuclear beta decay, and its precise determination is of interest for tests of CKM unitarity. Most information about its Q 2 dependence comes from quasielastic neutrino scattering and from pion electroproduction, and a recent reanalysis of the neutrino data have brought these two types of measurements into excellent agreement. However, these experiments are not sensitive to additional higher order corrections, such as nucleon anapole contributions, that are present in parity-violating electron scattering. In this talk I will attempt to review what is presently known about the axial form factor and its various pieces including the higher order contributions, discuss the various experimental sectors, and give an update on its determination through PV electron scattering.


Form Factor Radiative Correction Electromagnetic Form Factor Neutrino Data Vector Form Factor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    S.-L. Zhu, S.J. Puglia, B.R. Holstein, M.J. Ramsey-Musolf: Phys. Rev. D 62, 033008 (2000)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    D.O. Riska: Nucl. Phys. A 678, 79 (2000)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    C.M. Maekawa, U. van Kolck: Phys. Lett. B 478, 73 (2000); C.M. Maekawa, J.S. Viega, U. van Kolck: Phys. Lett. B 488, 167 (2000)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    K. Hagiwara et al.: Review of Particle Properties, Phys. Rev. D 66, 010001 (2002)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    H. Budd, A. Bodek, J. Arrington: arXiv:hep-ex/0308005Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Y. Nambu, D. Lurié: Phys. Rev. 125, 1429 (1962); Y. Nambu, E.Shrauner: Phys. Rev. 128, 862 (1962)CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. Liesenfeld et al.: Phys. Lett. B 468, 20 (1999)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    V. Bernard, L. Elouadrhiri, U.-G. Meissner: J. Phys. G 28, R1 (2002)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Minerνa proposal: K. McFarland, spokespersonGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jefferson Laboratory PAC25 Letter of Intent LOI-04-006: A. Deur, contactGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    M.J. Musolf, T.W. Donnelly, J. Dubach, S.J. Pollock, S. Kowalski, E.J. Beise: Physics Reports 239, 1 (1994)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    L.A. Ahrens et al.: Phys. Rev. D 35, 785 (1987)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    G.T. Garvey, W.C. Louis, D.H. White: Phys. Rev. C 48, 761 (1993)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    S. Pate: Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 082002 (2004)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    FiNeSSE proposal, R. Tayloe, B. Fleming: contactsGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    T. Ito et al.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 102003 (2004)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    L. Diaconescu, R. Schiavilla, U. van Kolck: Phys. Rev. C 63, 044007 (2001)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    R. Schiavilla, J. Carlson, M. Paris: Phys. Rev. C 67, 032501 (2003)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    C.P. Liu, G. Prezeau, M.J. Ramsey-Musolf: Phys. Rev. C 67, 035501 (2003)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    G0 Backward angle proposal: D. Beck, contact. Uncertainties were projected based on 80 μ A of (normal time structure) beam on a 20 cm deuterium target, along with uncertainties achieved in the forward angle measurement that was carried out in 2004Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    C.Y. Prescott et al.: Phys. Lett. B 84, 524 (1979)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    W. Heil et al.: Nucl. Phys. B 327, 1 (1989)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elizabeth Beise
    • 1
  1. 1.University of MarylandCollege ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations