Paleobiologic Effects of the Late Cretaceous Wetumpka Marine Impact, a 7.6-km-Diameter Impact Structure, Gulf Coastal Plain, USA

  • David T. KingJr.
  • Lucille W. Petruny
  • Thornton L. Neathery
Part of the Impact Studies book series (IMPACTSTUD)

Abstract

The 7.6-km-diameter Wetumpka impact structure in Alabama, USA, formed by a bolide impact within the shallow epicontinental Gulf of Mexico, during the Late Cretaceous (late Santonian to early Campanian). Water depths for the epicenter of this event are estimated to have been 30 to 100 m, and this feature probably formed within ∼ 25 km of the local barrier-island shoreline. All indications are that this impact would have been a locally devastating event. For example, the infra-red flash-burn radius extended to the local shore area and substantial seismic waves followed by a strong atmospheric blast wave would have reached the shoreline tropical forest very shortly after impact. Further, the radius of discontinuous ejecta would have extended beyond the local shoreline and other effects such as local tsunami run-up extended into the local shore-area tropical forest as well. The lower crater-filling unit of Wetumpka contains an impactentombed fossil record: there is considerably more lignite (fragments and finely divided material) in some of the impact breccias and sands than existed in any of the target strata. This implies that some comminuted wood from coeval, shore-area tropical forests was swept up within the returning marine-water washback-surgeback event -- or was air-borne in returning winds -- and thus became incorporated into the deep parts of the crater fill. Wetumpka’s crater fill also includes mixed trace and body fossils from slumped target materials and blocks displaying relic sedimentary facies of target units. Since impact, Wetumpka’s rim structure, mainly composed of crystalline basement rocks, appears to have been an enduring subaerial feature. Rim height estimates indicate that this crystalline feature (comprised today of a remnant ∼ 270° arc of elevated schists and gneisses) was subaerially exposed after impact. Deep tropical soil development (saprolitization) characterizes most of the higher elevations of the rim, probably attesting to long-term rim exposure since Late Cretaceous. We theorize that a limited terrestrial ecosystem could have existed at higher elevations upon the crater floor area as well during the interval between end of fall-back sedimentation and subsequent late-stage rim collapse; however only an intra-crater paleosol unit atop the fall-back crater fill remains as evidence of this possible period of stasis. Late-stage rim collapse resulted in catastrophic sedimentation across the crater floor area.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adushkin VV, Nemchinov IV (1994) Consequences of impacts of cosmic bodies on the surface of the Earth. In: Gehrels T (ed) Hazards due to Comets and Asteroids, University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp 721–778Google Scholar
  2. Bolt BA (1993) Earthquakes. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York, 331 ppGoogle Scholar
  3. Blank HR (1978) Fossil laterite on bedrock in Brooklyn, New York. Geology 6: 21–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Frazier WJ (1979) Sedimentology and paleoenvironmental analysis of the Upper Cretaceous Tuscaloosa and Eutaw Formations in western Georgia. In: Arden DD, Beck BF, Morrow E (eds) Second Symposium of the Geology of the Southeastern Coastal Plain, Georgia Geologic Survey, Information Series 53, pp 39–52Google Scholar
  5. Frazier WJ (1987) A guide to facies stratigraphy of the Eutaw Formation in western Georgia and eastern Alabama. In: Frazier WJ, Hanley TB (eds) Geology of the Fall Line: a Field Guide to Structure and Petrology of the Uchee Belt and Facies Stratigraphy of the Eutaw Formation in southwestern Georgia and adjacent Alabama, Georgia Geological Society, Atlanta, pp B1–B25Google Scholar
  6. Glasstone S, Dolan PJ (1977) The effects of nuclear weapons, 3d ed. United States Government Printing Office, Washington, 653 ppGoogle Scholar
  7. Gurov EP, Kelley SP, Koeberl C (2003) Ejecta of the Boltysh impact crater in the Ukranian shield. In: Koeberl C, MartÍnez-Ruiz F (eds) Impact Markers in the Stratigraphic Record, Impact Studies volume 2, Springer Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 179–202Google Scholar
  8. Haq BU, Hardenbol J, Vail PR (1988) Mesozoic and Cenozoic chronostratigraphy and eustatic cycles. In: Wilgus CK, Hastings BS, Kendall CGStCK, Posamentier HW, Ross CA, Van Wagoner JC (eds) Sea-level Changes: an Integrated Approach, Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Special Publication 42, pp 71–108Google Scholar
  9. Hills JG, Nemchinov IV, Popov, SP, Teterev A (1994) Tsunami generated by small asteroid impacts. In: Gehrels T (ed) Hazards Due to Comets and Asteroids, University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp 779–789Google Scholar
  10. King Jr DT (1994) Upper Cretaceous depositional sequences in the Alabama Gulf Coastal Plain: their characteristics, origin, and constituent clastic aquifers. Journal of Sedimentary Research 64: 258–265Google Scholar
  11. King Jr DT (1997) The Wetumpka impact crater and the Late Cretaceous impact record. In: Neathery TL, King DT Jr, Wolf LW (eds) The Wetumpka impact structure and related features, Alabama Geological Society Guidebook 34c, pp 25–56Google Scholar
  12. King Jr DT, Neathery TL, Petruny LW, Koeberl C, Hames WE (2002) Shallow marine-impact origin for the Wetumpka structure (Alabama, USA). Earth and Planetary Science Letters 202: 41–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. King Jr DT, Neathery TL, Petruny LW (2003) Crater-filling sediments of the Wetumpka marine-target impact crater (Alabama, USA). In: Dypvik H, Burchell MJ, Claeys P (eds) Cratering in Marine Environments and on Ice. Impact Studies, Springer Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 97–113Google Scholar
  14. King Jr EA (1976) Space Geology, an Introduction. Wiley and Sons, New York, 349 ppGoogle Scholar
  15. Mack GH, James WC (1992) Paleosols for Sedimentologists. Geological Society of America, Short Course Notes, 127 ppGoogle Scholar
  16. Mancini EA (1981) Paleobotanical studies in Alabama: 1845–1980. Geological Survey of Alabama Circular 106, 21 ppGoogle Scholar
  17. Mancini EA, Puckett TM, Parcell WC, Crow CJ, Smith CC (1998) Sequence stratigraphy and biostratigraphy of Upper Cretaceous strata of the Alabama Coastal Plain. In: Mancini EA, Puckett TM (eds) Sequence Stratigraphy and Biostratigraphy of Upper Cretaceous Strata of the Alabama Coastal Plain, Alabama Geological Society Guidebook 35, pp 1–12Google Scholar
  18. Melosh HJ (1989) Impact Cratering, a Geologic Process. Oxford University Press, New York, 245 ppGoogle Scholar
  19. Melosh HJ (2003) Impact-generated tsunamis: an over-rated hazard [abs.]. Lunar and Planetary Science 34: abs. #2013 (CD-ROM)Google Scholar
  20. Morrison D, Chapman CR, Slovic P (1994) The impact hazard. In: Gehrels T (ed) Hazards Due to Comets and Asteroids, University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp 59–92Google Scholar
  21. Neathery TL, Bentley RD, Lines GC (1976) Cryptoexplosive structure near Wetumpka, Alabama. Geological Society of America Bulletin 87: 567–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nettleton WD, Gamble EE, Allen BL, Borst G, Peterson FF (1989) Relict soils of subtropical regions of the United States. In: Bronger A, Catt JA (eds) Paleopedology, Nature and Application of aaleosols. Catena — a cooperating journal of the International Society of Soil Science, Supplement 16, pp 59–94Google Scholar
  23. Ormö J, Lindström M (2000) When a cosmic impact strikes the sea bed. Geological Magazine 137: 67–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ormö J, Shuvalov VV, Lindström M (2002) Numerical modeling for target water depth estimation of marine-target craters. Journal of Geophysical Research 107(E12): 5120–5128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Poag CW, Koeberl C, Reimold WU (2004) The Chesapeake Bay Crater, Geology and Geophysics of a late Eocene Submarine Impact Structure. Impact Studies, Springer Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 522 ppGoogle Scholar
  26. Pösges G, Schieber M (1997) The Ries Crater — Museum Nördlingen. Bavarian Academy for Teacher Training, Academy Bulletin 253, 80 ppGoogle Scholar
  27. Puckett TM (1991) Absolute paleobathymetry of Upper Cretaceous chalks based on ostracodes: Evidence from the Demopolis chalk (Campanian-Maastrichtian) of the northern Gulf Coastal Plain. Geology 19: 449–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Puckett TM (1994) Planktonic foraminiferal and ostracode biostratigraphy of upper Santonian through lower Maastrichtian strata in central Alabama. Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies Transactions 44: 585–595Google Scholar
  29. Reinhardt J (1980) Upper Cretaceous stratigraphy and depositional environments. In: Frey RW (ed) American Geological Institute, Excursions in Southeastern Geology II, pp 386–392Google Scholar
  30. Reinhardt J, Sigleo WR (1983) Mesozoic paleosols: examples from the Chattahoochee River valley. In: Carrington TJ (ed) Current studies of Cretaceous formations in eastern Alabama and western Georgia, Alabama Geological Society, Guidebook 20: 3–10Google Scholar
  31. Savrda CE, Blanton-Hooks AD, Collier JW, Drake RA, Graves RL, Hall AG, Nelson AI, Slone JC, Williams DD, Wood HAR (2000) Taenidium and associated ichnofossils in fluvial deposits, Tuscaloosa Formation, eastern Alabama, southeastern USA. Ichnos 7: 227–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schwimmer DR (2002) King of the Crocodylians, the Paleobiology of Deinoschuchus, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, 220 ppGoogle Scholar
  33. Sigleo WR, Reinhardt J (1988) Paleosols from some Cretaceous environments in the southeastern United States. In: Reinhardt J, Sigleo WR (eds) Paleosols and Weathering through Geologic Time: Principles and Applications, Geological Society of America, Special Paper 216, pp 123–142Google Scholar
  34. Sohl NF, Smith CC (1980) Notes on Cretaceous biostratigraphy. In: Frey RW (ed) American Geological Institute, Excursions in Southeastern Geology II, pp 392–402Google Scholar
  35. Thurmond JT, Jones DE (1981) Fossil Vertebrates of Alabama. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, 242 ppGoogle Scholar
  36. Toon OB, Zahnle K, Turco RP, Covey C (1994) Environmental perturbations caused by impacts. In: Gehrels T (ed) Hazards Due to Comets and Asteroids, University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp 791–827Google Scholar
  37. van Dorn WG, LeMéhauté B, Hwang L-S (1968) Handbook of Explosiongenerated Water Waves, volume 1 — State of the art, Tetra Tech, Pasadena. Report No TC-130, 174 ppGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • David T. KingJr.
    • 1
  • Lucille W. Petruny
    • 2
    • 3
  • Thornton L. Neathery
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of GeologyAuburn UniversityAuburnUSA
  2. 2.Astra-Terra ResearchAuburnUSA
  3. 3.Department of Curriculum and TeachingAuburn UniversityAuburnUSA
  4. 4.Neathery and AssociatesTuscaloosaUSA

Personalised recommendations