Advertisement

Remarks on the present status of SCA calculations

  • J. M. Hansteen
Classical Collisional Ionization
Part of the Lecture Notes in Physics book series (LNP, volume 294)

Abstract

An outline of the structure of the semiclassical approximation model for inner-shell Coulomb ionization is given. Criteria of validity are discussed and computations are seen in relation to recent experiments. The continued usefulness of the first-order perturbative method is emphasized.

Keywords

Impact Parameter Ionization Cross Section Semiclassical Approximation Projectile Energy Heavy Charged Particle 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1).
    N. Bohr, Kgl.Dan.Vidensk.Selsk., Mat.-Fys. Medd.18(1948)No.8.Google Scholar
  2. 2).
    Semiclassical Descriptions of Atomic and Nuclear Collisions. Niels Bohr Centennial Conferences 1985, eds. J. Bang and J. De Boer. (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1985).Google Scholar
  3. 3).
    K. Alder, A. Bohr, T. Huus, B. Mottelson and A. Winther, Rev.Mod.Phys. 28 (1956)432.Google Scholar
  4. 4).
    Treatise on Heavy-Ion Science, Vol.5. High-Enery Atomic Physics, ed. D. Allan Bromley. (Plenum Press, New York, 1985).Google Scholar
  5. 5).
    E. Merzbacher, in Semiclassical Descriptions of Atomic and Nuclear Collisions. Niels Bohr Centennial Conferences 1985, eds. J. Bang and J. De Boer (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1985) p.49.Google Scholar
  6. 6).
    J.U. Andersen, in Semiclassical Descriptions of Atomic and Nuclear Collisions. Niels Bohr Centennial Conferences 1985, eds. J. Bang and J. De Boer (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1985) p.463.Google Scholar
  7. 7).
    J. Bang and J.M. Hansteen, Kgl.Dan.Vidensk.Selsk., Mat.-Fys. Medd. 31 (1959) No.13.Google Scholar
  8. 8).
    J.M. Hansteen, in Advances in Atomic and Molecular Physics, eds. D.R. Bates and B. Bederson (Academic Press, New York,1975) Vol.11, p.299.Google Scholar
  9. 9).
    L. Kocbach, J.M. Hansteen and R. Gundersen, Nucl.Instr. and Meth. 169 (1980)281.Google Scholar
  10. 10).
    R. Gundersen, J.M. Hansteen and L. Kocbach, Nucl.Instr. and Meth. 192 (1982)63.Google Scholar
  11. 11).
    J.M. Hansteen and O.P. Mosebekk, Phys.Rev.Lett. 29 (1972)1361.Google Scholar
  12. 12).
    J. Reinhardt and W. Greiner, in Treatise on Heavy-Ion Science, Vol.5, High-Energy Atomic Physics, ed. D. Allan Bromley (Plenum Press, New York,1985) p.1.Google Scholar
  13. 13).
    H.A. Bethe, Ann.Phys. 5 (1930)325.Google Scholar
  14. 14).
    L. Kocbach, Z.Phys. A279 (1976)233.Google Scholar
  15. 15).
    L. Kocbach, J.Phys. B9 (1976)2269.Google Scholar
  16. 16).
    P.A. Amundsen, J.Phys. B9 (1976)971.Google Scholar
  17. 17).
    L. Kocbach, Phys.Norv. 8 (1976)187.Google Scholar
  18. 18).
    P.A. Amundsen, J.Phys. B10 (1977)2177.Google Scholar
  19. 19).
    M. Pauli, F. Rösel and D. Trautmann, J.Phys. B11 (1978)2511.Google Scholar
  20. 20).
    K. Taulbjerg, J.Phys. B10 (1977)L341.Google Scholar
  21. 21).
    J.M. Hansteen, L. Kocbach and A. Graue, Phys.Scr. 31 (1985)63.Google Scholar
  22. 22).
    D.H. Madison and E. Merzbacher, in Atomic Inner-Shell Processes, Vol.I, ed. B. Crasemann (Academic Press, New York, 1975) p.2.Google Scholar
  23. 23).
    M. Pauli and D, Trautmann, J.Phys. B11 (1978)667.Google Scholar
  24. 24).
    F. Rösel, D. Trautmann and G. Baur, Nucl.Instr. and Meth. 192 (1982)43Google Scholar
  25. 24a).
    D.Trautmann, private communications.Google Scholar
  26. 25).
    H. Paul, Nucl.Instr. and Meth. 192 (1982)11.Google Scholar
  27. 26).
    H. Paul and W. Obermann, Nucl.Instr. and Meth. 214 (1983)15Google Scholar
  28. 26a).
    H. Paul, private communications.Google Scholar
  29. 27).
    H. Paul, Nucl.Instr. and Meth. B3 (1984)5.Google Scholar
  30. 28).
    H. Paul and J. Muhr, Phys.Rep. 135 (1986)47.Google Scholar
  31. 29).
    H. Paul, Z.Phys. D4 (1987)249.Google Scholar
  32. 30).
    R. Gundersen, Scientific/Technical Report No. 121, Department of Physis, University of Bergen, Bergen 1981.Google Scholar
  33. 31).
    O. Aashamar and L. Kocbach, Z.Phys. A279 (1976)237.Google Scholar
  34. 32).
    K. Alder and A. Winther, Electromagnetic Excitation (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1975) p.191.Google Scholar
  35. 33).
    D. Trautmann and F. Rösel, Nucl.Instr. and Meth. 169 (1980)259.Google Scholar
  36. 34).
    A. Graue, J.M. Hansteen, R. Gundersen and L. Kocbach, J.Phys. B15 (1982)L445Google Scholar
  37. 36a).
    35)D. Trautmann and F. Rösel, Nucl.Instr. and Meth. 214 (1983)21.Google Scholar
  38. 36).
    P.A. Amundsen, J.Phys. B11 (1978)3197.Google Scholar
  39. 37).
    W. Brandt, R. Laubert and I.A. Sellin, Phys.Lett. 21 (1966)518.Google Scholar
  40. 38).
    E. Laegsgaard, J.U. Andersen and M. Lund, in Proc. 10th ICPEAC, Paris, 1977, ed. G. Watel (North-Holland, Amsterdam,1978)p.353Google Scholar
  41. 39).
    M.H. Chen and B. Crasemann, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 33 (1985)217.Google Scholar
  42. 40).
    A.L. Ford, E. Fitchard and J.F. Reading, Phys.Rev. A16 (1977)133.Google Scholar
  43. 41).
    F.M. El-Ashry, M. Goclowski, L. Glowacka, M. Jaskota, Z. Zelazny and J. Szerypo, J.Phys. B19 (1986)2311.Google Scholar
  44. 42).
    Z. Zelazny and P. Hornshöj, J.Phys. B17 (1984)1867.Google Scholar
  45. 43).
    J.U. Andersen, E. Laegsgaard, M. Lund and C.D. Moak, Nucl.Instr. and Meth. 132 (1976)507.Google Scholar
  46. 44).
    H. Schmidt:-Booking, K.E. Stiebing, W. Schadt, N. Løchter, G. Gruber, S. Kelbch, K. Bethge, R. Schuch and I. Tserruya, Nucl.Instr. and Meth. 192 (1982)71.Google Scholar
  47. 45).
    R. Schuch, Y. Awaya, T. Kambara, T. Mizogawa, Y. Kanai and H. Shibata, Z.Phys. D4 (1987)339.Google Scholar
  48. 46).
    H.B. Thomseth, Thesis, University of Bergen, 1987.Google Scholar
  49. 47).
    G. Mehler, W. Greiner and G. Soff, preprint and J.Phys. B20 (1987)2787.Google Scholar
  50. 48).
    P.A. Amundsen and K. Aashamar, J.Phys. B14 (1981)4047.Google Scholar
  51. 49).
    U. Becker, N. Grün, K. Momberger and W. Scheid, in Physics of Strong Fields, ed. W. Greiner (Plenum Press, New York, 1987), in press.Google Scholar
  52. 50).
    T. Papp, L. Kocbach and J.M. Hansteen, (1987), to be published.Google Scholar
  53. 51).
    J.H. McGuire and L. Weaver, Phys.Rev. A16 (1977)41.Google Scholar
  54. 52).
    D.F. Burch, Proc.Int.Conf. on Inner-Shell Ionization Phenomena, Atlanta, Georgia 1972, eds. R.W. Fink et al. (USAEC, Oak Ridge, Tenn., USA, 1973) p.1464.Google Scholar
  55. 53).
    T. Aberg and O. Goscinski, X-Ray and Atomic Inner-Shell Phenomena, ed. B. Crasemann, AIPCP No. 94 (American Institute of Physics, New York, 1982) p.121.Google Scholar
  56. 54).
    T. Aberg, Å. Blomberg, J. Tulkki and O. Goscinsky, Phys.Rev. Lett. 52 (1984)1207.Google Scholar
  57. 55).
    J.M. Hansteen, O.M. Johnsen and L. Kocbach, At.Data Nucl.Data Tables 15 (1975)305.Google Scholar
  58. 56).
    P. Armbruster, H.H. Behncke, S. Hagmann, D. Liesen, F. Folkmann and P. Mokler, Z.Phys. A288 (1978)277.Google Scholar
  59. 57).
    J. Bang, J.M. Hansteen, Phys.Lett. 72A (1979)217; J. Bang and J.M. Hansteen, Phys.Scr. 22(1981)609.Google Scholar
  60. 58).
    D. Liesen, P. Armbruster, F. Bosch, S. Hagmann, P.H. Mokler, H.J. Wollersheim, H. Schmidt-Böcking, R. Schuch and J.B. Wilhelmy, Phys.Rev.Lett. 44 (1980)1983.Google Scholar
  61. 59).
    A. Warczak, GSI Report (1985), GSI-85-26.Google Scholar
  62. 60).
    A. Warczak, D. Liesen and B. Liu, J.Phys. B19 (1986)1793.Google Scholar
  63. 61).
    G.H. Pepper, R.D. Lear, T.J. Gray, R.P. Chaturvedi and C.F. Moore, Phys.Rev. A12 (1975)1237.Google Scholar
  64. 62).
    T. Papp and L. Kocbach, private communication 1987.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. M. Hansteen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsUniversity of BergenBergenNorway

Personalised recommendations