Probabilistic inferential engines in expert systems: How should the strength of rules be expressed?

  • Gerardo Steve
Section II Approaches To Uncertainty C) Probability Theory
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 286)


Expert System Independence Assumption Prior Probability Distribution Inferential Model Separate Opinion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1).
    Hàjek P. Combining functions for certainty degrees in consulting systems. Int. J. Man-Machine Studies 22 (1985) 59–76Google Scholar
  2. 2).
    Duda R.O, Hart P.E, Nilsson N.J. Subjective Bayesian methods for rule-based inference systems. Proc. NCC 1976 AFIP Press.Google Scholar
  3. 3).
    Gashnig J. PROSPECTOR, an Expert System for mineral exploration State of the art Report on machine intelligence. A. Bond ed. 1981Google Scholar
  4. 4).
    Pednault E.P.D, Zucker S.W, Muresan L.V. On the independence assumptions under lying Bayesian updating. Art. Int. J. 16 (1981) 213–222Google Scholar
  5. 5).
    White A.P. Inference deficiencies in rule-based Expert Systems. Proc. BCSS Group on ES Conf. 1984 Cambridge Un. Press 39–50Google Scholar
  6. 6).
    Glymour C. Independence assumptions and Bayesian updating. Art. Int. J. 25 (1985) 95–99Google Scholar
  7. 7).
    Johnson R.W Independence and Bayesian updating methods. Proc. Uncertainty and Probability in Al. UCLA'85Google Scholar
  8. 8).
    Steve G. On probabilistic inference in Expert Systems and diagnostic models. Rapp. Int. CNR ITBM RI 5/85Google Scholar
  9. 9).
    Dreyfus H.L. What computers can't do: the limits of Al. Harper & Row 1979Google Scholar
  10. 10).
    RossiMori A, Steve G. Eliciting knowledge from a group of experts about pediatric infectious diseases. In: Medical Decision Making, diagnostic strategies & ES. North-Holland 1985Google Scholar
  11. 11).
    Jacquez J.A, Norusis M.J. The importance of symptom non independence in diagnosis. In: Decision Making and Medical Care. deDombal & Gremy eds. North-Holland 1976Google Scholar
  12. 12).
    Spiegelhalter D.J. Statistical & knowledge-based approaches to clinical DSS, with an application in gastroenterology. J. of R. Stat. Soc. A (1984) 35–77Google Scholar
  13. 13).
    Perez A, Jirousek R. Constructing an intensional ES: INES (see some more in references) In: Medical Decision Making, diagnostic strategies & ES. North-Holland 1985 307–15Google Scholar
  14. 14).
    De Rosis F, Steve G. et al. Decision making in ocology protocol management. In: Medical Decision Making Diagnostic Strategies and ES. North-Holland 1985 140–3Google Scholar
  15. 15).
    Belvedere M, De Rosis F, Pizzutilo S, Steve G., Biagini C, MauriziEnrici R. Comparison of statistical & Al approaches to uncertain inference in an oncology protocol. In IPMU Proc.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gerardo Steve
    • 1
  1. 1.Consiglio Nazionale delle RicercheIstituto Tecnologie BiomedicheRomaItaly

Personalised recommendations