ND elastic scattering, breakup reactions and the search for three-nucleon forces

  • H. O. Klages
Working Group 2: The Long-Wavelength Region
Part of the Lecture Notes in Physics book series (LNP, volume 260)


The present experimental situation in the nd scattering system is reviewed for the elastic scattering and for the breakup reaction channel. Faddeev calculations show the need of precise two-nucleon input in higher partial waves, especially p-waves for the description of spin-dependent observables. The experimental effort in the nd breakup reaction studies is to be guided by reliable Faddeev predictions. The sensitivity of specific kinematical situations has to be studied carefully. The inclusion of three-body forces in these calculations should be combined with a careful check of Coulomb correction methods. The pd breakup reaction could yield more information than the experimentally more difficult nd studies.


Elastic Scattering Tensor Force Breakup Reaction Coulomb Correction High Partial Wave 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1).
    B.H.J.McKellar and W. Glöckle, Nucl.Phys. A416, 435c (1984), and references therein.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2).
    W.Meier and W.Glöckle, Phys.Rev. C28, 1807 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 2)a.
    R.Brandenburg and W.Glöckle, Nucl.Phys. A377, 379 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 3).
    W.Meier and W.Glöckle, Phys.Lett. 138B, 329 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 4).
    P.Schwarz, H.O.Klages, P.Doll, B.Haesner, J.Wilczynski, B.Zeitnitz and J.Kecskemeti, Nucl.Phys. A398, 1 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 4)a.
    L.Amtén, Ph.D.thesis, University of Uppsala (1977)Google Scholar
  7. 4)b.
    J.L.Romero, J.A.Jungerman, F.P.Brady, W.J.Knox and Y.Ishizaki, Phys.Rev. C2, 2134 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 4)c.
    K.Hofmann, Ph.D. thesis, University of Karlsruhe (1985)Google Scholar
  9. 5).
    H.O.Klages, H.Dobiasch, P.Doll, H.Krupp, M.Oexner, P.Plischke, B.Zeitnitz, F.P.Brady and J.C.Hiebert, Nucl.Instr. and Meth. 219, 269 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 6).
    W.Tornow, R.C.Byrd, C.R.Howell, R.S.Pedroni and R.L.Walter, Phys.Rev. C27, 2439 (1983) and references therein.Google Scholar
  11. 6)a.
    J.W.Watson, R.Garrett, F.P.Brady, D.H.Fitzgerald, J.L.Romero, J.L.Ullmann and I.Zanelli, Phys.Rev. C25, 2219 (1982), and references therein.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 6)b.
    W.Nitz, Diploma thesis, University of Karlsruhe (1985)Google Scholar
  13. 7).
    Y.Koike, RCNP Osaka, private communicationGoogle Scholar
  14. 8).
    J.Böttcher, J.Cub, E.Finckh, G.Fuchs,K.Geissdörfer, B.Kratz, R.Lin, S.Schindler, M.Seiter, K.Stauber, R.Stegen, J.Strate and W.Tornow, Verh.DPG (VI) 21, 454 (1986).Google Scholar
  15. 9).
    J.Krug, W.Lübeke, S.Obermanns, H.Rühl, M.Steinke, M.Stephan, D.Kamke, K.Bodek and A.Szczurek, Verh. DPG (VI) 21, 456 (1986), and contribution to this conferenceGoogle Scholar
  16. 10).
    C.R.Howell, W.Tornow and R.L.Walter, TUNL, private communicationGoogle Scholar
  17. 11).
    R.Fischer, H.Dobiasch, B.Haesner, H.O.Klages, R.Maschuw, P.Schwarz and B.Zeitnitz, Lecture Notes in Physics 82, ed. H.Zingl (Springer, New York, 1978) Vol. I, p.259Google Scholar
  18. 11)a.
    C.R.Howell, TUNL, private communicationGoogle Scholar
  19. 12).
    F.N.Rad, H.E.Conzett, R.Roy, F.Seiler, Phys.Rev. Lett. 35, 1134 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 13).
    J.S.C.McKee and J.P.Svenne, Univ. of Manitoba, private communicationGoogle Scholar
  21. 14).
    M.Karus, M.Buballa, H.Helten, B.Laumann, R.Melzer, P.Niessen, H.Oswald, G.Rauprich, J.Schulte-Uebbing and H.Paetz gen.Schieck, Phys.Rev. C31, 1112 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 15).
    P.Doleschall, W.Grüebler, V.König, P.A.Schmelzbach, F.Sperisen and B.Jenny, Nucl.Phys. A380, 72 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. O. Klages
    • 1
  1. 1.Kernforschungszentrum KarlsruheInstitut für Kernphysik IKarlsruheGermany

Personalised recommendations