Advertisement

Some contributions to the logical analysis of circumscription

  • Gerhard Jaeger
Nondassical Deducation
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 230)

Abstract

After sketching the first and second order version of McCarthy's predicate circumscription, we introduce the notion of positive disjunctive circumscription as an approach to (this form of) non-monotonic reasoning which guarantees consistency. We define the positive disjunctive extension PD(T) of a first order theory T and show that it is conservative over T. Then we turn to sets defined by positive disjunctive circumscription and state a boundedness theorem concerning their stages. The last considerations refer to generalizations of positive disjunctive circumscription. We discuss the inclusion of (intersective) priority relations and extensions by iteration.

Keywords

Priority Relation Order Theory Proof Theory Relation Symbol Conservative Extension 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Buchholz, W., Feferman, S., Pohlers, W. and Sieg, W. Iterated Inductive Definitions and Subsystems of Analysis: Recent Proof-Theoretical Studies. Lecture Notes in Mathematics 897, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York (1981).Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Chang C.L. and Lee R.C.T. Symbolic Logic and Mechanical Theorem Proving. Academic Press, New York (1973).Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Clark, K. Negation as failure. In: Logic and Databases. Gallaire, H. and Minker, J. (eds.). Plenum Press, New York (1978).Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Davis, M. The mathematics of non-monotonic reasoning. Artificial Intelligence 13 (1980).Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Etherington, D.W., Mercer, R.E. and Reiter, R. On the adequacy of predicate circumscription for closed-world reasoning. Computational Intelligence 1 (1985).Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Feferman, S. Monotone inductive definitions. In: The L.E.J. Brouwer Centenary Symposion. Troelstra, A.S. and van Dalen, D. (eds.). North Holland, Amsterdam (1982).Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Jaeger, G. The proof-theoretic analysis of positive disjunctive circumscription. Preprint, Zuerich (1985).Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Lifschitz, V. Computing circumscription. Proceedings IJCAI-85.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Lifschitz, V. Closed world data bases and circumscription. Preprint 1985.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Lifschitz, V. On the satisfiability of circumscription. Preprint 1986.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    McCarthy, C. Circumscription — a form of non-monotonic reasoning. Artificial Intelligence 13 (1980).Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    McCarthy, C. Applications of circumscription to formalizing common sense knowledge. AAAI Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning (1984).Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    McDermott, D. and Doyle, J. Non-monotonic logic I. Artificial Intelligence 13 (1980).Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Moore, R.C. Semantical considerations on nonmonotonic logic. Artificial Intelligence 25 (1985).Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Moschovakis, Y.N. Elementary Induction on Abstract Structures. North Holland, Amsterdam (1974).Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Parikh, R. Logic of knowledge, games and dynamic logic. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 181. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Tokyo (1984).Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Reiter, R. On closed world data bases. In: Logic and Databases. Gallaire, H. and Minker J. (eds.). Plenum Press, New York (1978).Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Reiter, R. Circumscription implies predicate completion (sometimes). Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI-82.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    Shoenfield, J.R. Mathematical Logic. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass. (1967).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gerhard Jaeger
    • 1
  1. 1.ETH-Zuerich MathematikSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations