Advertisement

A logarithmic boolean time algorithm for parallel polynomial division

  • D. Bini
  • V. Pan
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 227)

Abstract

A new algorithm is presented to improve by a factor of log m the estimates for both parallel and sequential time complexity of division with a remainder of two integer polynomials. Under the parallel model, this means Boolean logarithmic time, which is asymptotically optimum. The algorithm exploits the reduction of the problem to integer division; the polynomial remainder and quotient are recovered from integer remainder and quotient via binary segmentation.

Key Words

Parallel computational complexity Boolean circuit complexity polynomial division triangular Toeplitz matrix inversion interpolation by binary segmentation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [B]
    D. Bini, Parallel Solution of Certain Toeplitz Linear System, SIAM J. Comp. 13, 2, 268–276 (1984), also T.R.B82-04, I.E.I. of C.N.R., Pisa, Italy (April 1982).Google Scholar
  2. [BCH]
    P.W. Beam, S. Cook and H.J. Hoover, Log Depth Circuits for Division and Related Problems, Proc. 25-th Ann. IEEE FOCS Symp., 1–6 (1984).Google Scholar
  3. [BGH]
    A. Borodin, J. von zur Gathen, and J. Hopcroft, Fast Parallel Matrix and GCD Computations, Inform. and Control 53, 3 241–256 (1982).Google Scholar
  4. [BM]
    A. Borodin and I. Munro, The Computational Complexity of Algebraic and Numeric Problems, American Elsevier, New York (1975).Google Scholar
  5. [BP]
    D. Bini and V. Pan, Polynomial Division and Its Computational Complexity, Tech. Report TR 86-2, Computer Science Dept., SUNYA, Albany, NY (1986), to appear in Journal of Complexity.Google Scholar
  6. [FP]
    M.J. Fischer and M.S. Paterson, String Matching and Other Products, SIAM-AMS Proc., 7, 113–125 (1974).Google Scholar
  7. [H]
    A.S. Householder, The Numerical Treatment of a Single Nonlinear Equation, McGraw-Hill, New York (1970).Google Scholar
  8. [K]
    D.E. Knuth, The Art of Computer Programming: Seminumerical Algorithms 2, Addison-Wesley (1981).Google Scholar
  9. [P80]
    V. Pan, The Bit-Operation Complexity of the Convolution of Vectors and of the DFT, Tech. Rep. TR 80-6, Computer Science Dept., SUNYA, Albany, N.Y. (1980).Google Scholar
  10. [P84]
    V. Pan, How to Multiply Matrices Faster, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 179, Springer-Verlag (1984).Google Scholar
  11. [P85]
    V. Pan, The Bit Complexity of Matrix Multiplication and of Related Computations in Linear Algebra. The Segmented λ Algorithms, Computers and Math. (with Applications) 11,9, 919–928 (1985).Google Scholar
  12. [P85a]
    V. Pan, Fast and Efficient Algorithms for the Exact Inversion of Integer Matrices, Proc. 5-th Conf. of Software Technology and Theoret. Comp. Sci., Indian Inst. of Techn., Delhi and Tata Inst. of Fundam. Research, New Delhi, India (1985).Google Scholar
  13. [P85b]
    V. Pan, Algebraic Complexity of Computing Polynomail Zeros, Tech. Report TR 85-27, Computer Sci. Dept., SUNYA, Albany, NY (December 1985).Google Scholar
  14. [R]
    J. Reif, Logarithmic Depth Circuits for Algebraic Functions, SIAM J. on Computing 15, 231–242 (1986).Google Scholar
  15. [S]
    J.E. Savage, The Complexity of Computing, John Wiley and Sons, N.Y. (1976).Google Scholar
  16. [Sc]
    A. Schönhage, Asymptotically Fast Algorithms for the Numerical Multiplication and Division of Polynomials with Complex Coefficients, Proc. EUROCAM, (1982).Google Scholar
  17. [Sc1]
    A. Schönhage, The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra in Terms of Computational Complexity, manuscript (1982).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Bini
    • 1
  • V. Pan
    • 2
  1. 1.Dept. of MathematicsUniversity of PisaItaly
  2. 2.Dept. of Computer ScienceSUNYAlbany

Personalised recommendations