Advertisement

Do we really have conditional statements in our brains?

  • Jean-Michel Hoc
Cognitive Aspects
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 178)

Keywords

Response Latency Control Structure Semantic Representation Abstract Representation Command Sequence 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cordier, F., Dubois, D. (1981). Typicalité et représentation cognitive. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 1, 299–333.Google Scholar
  2. Green, T.R.G. (1980). Ifs and thens: is nesting just for the birds? Software Practice and Experience, n. 10.Google Scholar
  3. Green, T.R.G., Payne, S.J., Van der Veer, G.C. (1983). The psychology of computer use. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  4. Hoc J.M. (1982) Représentation des donnéees et structure de contrôle d'un processus de traitement. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 2, 389–419.Google Scholar
  5. Hoc J.M. (1983a). Analysis of beginner's problem-solving strategies in programming. In Green et al.Google Scholar
  6. Hoc J.M. (1983b). Evaluation of different modalities of verbalisation in a sorting task. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 18, 293–306.Google Scholar
  7. Hoc J.M. (1983c). L'analyse planifiée des données en psychologie. PUF, Paris.Google Scholar
  8. Lesuisse, R. (1983). Analyse des raisonnements faits et des erreurs commises dans des programmes publiés de recherche dichotomique. Le Travail Humain, 46, 239–254.Google Scholar
  9. Miller L.A. (1981). Natural language programming: styles, strategies, and contrasts. Perspectives in Computing, 1, 22–33.Google Scholar
  10. Piaget, J. (1974a). La prise de conscience. PUF, Paris.Google Scholar
  11. Piaget, J. (1974b). Réussir et comprendre, PUF, Paris.Google Scholar
  12. Richard, J.F. (1980). L'attention, PUF, Paris.Google Scholar
  13. Rouanet, H., Lépine, D., Pelnard-Considère, J. (1976). Bayes-fiducial procedures as practical substitutes for misplaced significance testing: an application to educational data. Advances in psychological and educational measurements. D.N.M. de Gruiter, L.J.T. van der Kamp, H.F. Crombag (eds). Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  14. Sime M.E., Arblaster, A.T., Green, T.R.G. (1977). Reducing programming errors in nested conditionals by prescribing a writing procedure. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 9, 119–126.Google Scholar
  15. Van der Veer G.C., Van de Wolde, G.J.E. (1983). Individual differences and aspects of control flow notations. In Green et al.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jean-Michel Hoc
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratoire de Psychologie du Travail de l'EPHE (ERA CNRS)ParisFrance

Personalised recommendations