Advertisement

Long-range Heisenberg spin glasses in a magnetic field: Theory and experiment

Theoretical Papers
Part of the Lecture Notes in Physics book series (LNP, volume 192)

Abstract

A survey is given of recent experimental and theoretical results concerning long-range Heisenberg spin glasses in a magnetic field, together with a tentative interpretation of certain formal aspects of the theory in physical terms.

Keywords

Spin Glass Replica Symmetry Spin Quantum Number Spin Glass Phase Improve Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. /1/.
    For recent reviews see e.g. R. Rammal, J. Souletie, in: Magnetism of Metals and Alloys (M. Cyrot, Ed.), North Holland, Amsterdam, 1982; U. Krey, in: Berichte der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Magnetismus, Vol.I, (H. Mende, Ed.), Verlag Stahleisen, Düsseldorf (1983); K. Fischer, phys.stat.sol. (b), 116,357, (1983)Google Scholar
  2. /2/.
    D. Sherrington, S. Kirkpatrick, Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 1792 (1975); S. Kirkpatrick, D. Sherrington, Phys. Rev. B 17, 4384 (1978)Google Scholar
  3. /3/.
    R. Fisch, A.B. Harris, Phys.Rev.Lett. 38, 785 (1977); I. Morgenstern, K. Binder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 1615 (1979); Phys.Rev.B 22, 288 (1980); Z. Physik B 39, 227 (1980); A. J. Bray, M. A. Moore, J. Phys. C 12, 79 (1979); H. Sompolinsky, A. Zippelius, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1297 (1983)Google Scholar
  4. /4/.
    H. Maletta, in: Excitations in Disordered Systems (M. F. Thorpe, Ed.), Plenum Press, New York 1982Google Scholar
  5. /5/.
    H. G. Bohn, W. Zinn, B. Dorner, A. Kollmar, J. Appl. Phys. 52, 2228 (1981)Google Scholar
  6. /6/.
    D. Sherrington, D. M. Cragg, D. Elderfield, M. Gabay, J. Phys. Soc. Japan 52 (suppl.), 229 (1983); D. M. Cragg, D. Sherrington, M. Gabay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 158 (1982); D. Elderfield, D. Sherrington, J. Phys. C, in pressGoogle Scholar
  7. /7/.
    J. R. L. de Almeida, D. J. Thouless, J. Phys. A 11, 983 (1978)Google Scholar
  8. /8/.
    G. Parisi, Phys. Lett. 73 A, 203 (1979); Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 1754 (1979); J. Phys. A 13, L 115; 1101; 1887 (1980); Phil_ Mag. B 41, 677 (1980); Phys. Rep. 67, 25 (1980); preprint (1983)Google Scholar
  9. /9/.
    C. de Dominicis, these proceedings; C. de Dominicis, I. Kondor, Phys. Rev. B 27, 606 (1983)Google Scholar
  10. /10/.
    H. Sompolinsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 935 (1981); H. Sompolinsky, A. Zippelius, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 359 (1981); 50, 1297 (1983); J. Phys. C 15, L 1059 (1983); Phys Rev. B 25, 6860 (1982); H. Sompolinsky, these proceedingsGoogle Scholar
  11. /11/.
    D. J. Thouless, P. W. Anderson, R. G. Palmer, Phil. Mag. 35, 593 (1977)Google Scholar
  12. /12/.
    L. R. Walker, R. E. Walstedt, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 31–34, 1289 (1983); R. E. Walstedt, L. R. Walker, J. Appl. Phys. 53, 7985 (1982)Google Scholar
  13. /13/.
    H. Kett, W. Gebhardt, U. Krey, J. K. Furdyna, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 25, 215 (1981); H. Kett, PhD-thesis, Regensburg 1982Google Scholar
  14. /14/.
    J. A. Gaj, R. R. Galazka, M. Nawrocki, Sol. State Comm. 25, 193 (1978)Google Scholar
  15. /15/.
    R. R. Galazka, S. Nagata, P. H. Keesom, Phys. Rev. B 22, 3344 (1980)Google Scholar
  16. /16/.
    T. Giebultowicz, H. Kepa, B. Buras, K. Klausen, R. R. Galazka, Solid State Comm. 40, 499 (1981)Google Scholar
  17. /17/.
    M. Gabay, G. Toulouse, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 201 (1981); G. Toulouse, M. Gabay, T. C. Lubensky, J Vanninemus, J. Physique Lettres 43, L 109 (1982)Google Scholar
  18. /18/.
    M. Gabay, T. Garel, C. de Dominicis, J. Phys. C 15, 7165 (1982)Google Scholar
  19. /19/.
    If s is not ≫ 1, then (1a) must be corrected, the dominant term at low fields being linear in H instead of quadratic, see chap. III.Google Scholar
  20. /20/.
    R. V. Chamberlin, M. Hardiman, L. A. Turkevich, R. Orbach, Phys. Rev. B 25, 6720 (1982)Google Scholar
  21. /21/.
    R. F. Schulz, E. F. Wassermann, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 31–34, 1365 (1983)Google Scholar
  22. /22/.
    P.Monod, H.Bouchiat, J.Physique Lettr. 43, L 45 (1982)Google Scholar
  23. /23/.
    N.Bontemps, J.Rajchenbach, R.Orbach, preprint, 1983Google Scholar
  24. /24/.
    M.B.Salamon, J.L.Tholence, J.Mag.Mag.Mater. 31–34, 1375 (1983); J.L.Tholence, M.B.Salamon, J.Mag.Mag.Mater. 31–34, 1340 (1983)Google Scholar
  25. /25/.
    J.Hamida, C.Paulsen, S.J.Williamson, H.Maletta, to be publishedGoogle Scholar
  26. /26/.
    W.Kinzel, K.Binder, Phys.Rev.Lett. 50, 1509 (1983)Google Scholar
  27. /27/.
    R.Omari, J.J.Préjean, J.Souletie, preprint (1983); J.Souletie, these proceedingsGoogle Scholar
  28. /28/.
    J.Lauer, W.Keune, Phys.Rev.Lett. 48, 185 (1982); W.Marschmann, J.Lauer, W.Keune, J.Mag.Mag.Mater. 31–34, 1345 (1983); R.A.Brand, V.Manns, W.Keune, this conferenceGoogle Scholar
  29. /29/.
    J.Stein, U.Krey, Z.Phys. B 34, 287 (1979); B 37, 13 (1980)Google Scholar
  30. /30/.
    U.Krey, W.Maaß, J.Stein, Z.Phys. B 49, 199 (1982)Google Scholar
  31. /31/.
    U.T.Höchli, L.A.Boatner, Phys.Rev. B 20, 266 (1979)Google Scholar
  32. /32/.
    M.Fähnle, G.Herzer, T.Egami, H.Kronmüller, J.Appl.Phys. 53, 2326 (1982); J.Mag.Mag.Mater. 24, 175 (1981)Google Scholar
  33. /33/.
    M.Fähnle, T.Egami, Solid State Comm. 44, 533 (1982); J.Appl.Phys. 53, 7693 (1982)Google Scholar
  34. /34/.
    K.Binder, these proceedingsGoogle Scholar
  35. /35/.
    R.Barbara, A.P.Malozemoff, Y.Imry, Phys.Rev.Lett. 47, 1852 (1981); J.Appl.Phys. 53, 2205 (1982)Google Scholar
  36. /36/.
    A.Berton, J.Chaussy, J.Odin, R.Rammal, R.Tournier, J.Phys. Lettr. 43, L153 (1982)Google Scholar
  37. /37/.
    S.Nagata, R.H.Keesom, H.R.Harrison, Phys.Rev. B 19, 1633 (1979)Google Scholar
  38. /38/.
    See e.g. W.Gebhardt, U.Krey, Phasenübergänge und kritische Phänomene, Vieweg, Wiesbaden, 1980, chapt.I.Google Scholar
  39. /39/.
    N.D.Mackenzie, A.P.Young, preprint; see also P.Young, these proceedingsGoogle Scholar
  40. /40/.
    G.Toulouse, Comm.Phys. 2, 27 (1977)Google Scholar
  41. /41/.
    P.W.Anderson, B.I.Halperin, C.M.Varma, Phil.Mag. 25, 1 (1975)Google Scholar
  42. /42/.
    J.F.Fernandez, M.Medina, Phys.Rev. B 19, 3561 (1979)Google Scholar
  43. /43/.
    D.Kumar, J.Stein, J.Magn.Mag.Mat. C 13, 3011 (1980)Google Scholar
  44. /44/.
    Former doubts about the validity of the symmetry argument have been withdrawn in: A.P.Young, S.Jain, J.Phys. A 16, L 199 (1983)Google Scholar
  45. /45/.
    K.H.Fischer, Sol. State Comm. 18, 1515 (1976)Google Scholar
  46. /46/.
    H.J. Sommers, J.Physique Lett. in press; Z. Physik B 50, 97 (1983) J.Phys. A 16, 447 (1983)Google Scholar
  47. /47/.
    q(xmax) is larger than the value obtained with the (replica symmetric) meanfield theory analogue q of Eqs. (15); e.g. in the Ising case q(xmax) = ε + ε2 + ..., see /10/, while q = ε + 2ε2/3 + ..., with ε = (To-T)/To.Google Scholar
  48. /48/.
    C. de Dominicis, M.Gabay, H.Orland, J.de Physique Lett. 42, L 523 (1981); C. de Dominicis, M.Gabay, B.Duplantier, J.Phys. A 15, L 47 (1982)Google Scholar
  49. /49/.
    D.L.Huber, Physica 87 A, 199 (1977)Google Scholar
  50. /50/.
    R.G.Palmer, Adv. in Phys. 31, 669 (1982), and these proceedingsGoogle Scholar
  51. /51/.
    R.Kubo, J.Phys. Soc. Japan 12, 570 (1970)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • U. Krey
    • 1
  1. 1.Naturwiss. Fak. II - PhysikUniversität RegensburgRegensburgGermany

Personalised recommendations