Advertisement

Laser Physics pp 195-212 | Cite as

Pump dynamical effects in superfluorescent quantum initiation and pulse evolution

  • Charles M. Bowden
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Physics book series (LNP, volume 182)

Abstract

Recent work is reviewed where it,is shown that even in the regime where the temporal width of the pumping pulse, τP , and the characteristic superfluorescence (SF) time, τR , are such that τPR < 1, the effect of coherent pumping on a three-level system can cause a significant contribution to the quantum mechanical SF initiation and corresponding amplified temporal fluctuations. Other recent work shows, furthermore, that for τPR > > 1, but τPD < 1, where τD is the time delay between the pump pulse peak and the SF peak intensities, initial characteristics of the injected coherent pumping pulse can have distinct deterministic effects on SF pulse longitudinal, transverse and temporal evolution.

Keywords

Pump Pulse Nonlinear Regime Deterministic Effect Pump Transition Pulse Area 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    R. Bonifacio and L. A. Lugiato, Phys. Rev. A11, 1507 (1975); A12, 587 (1975).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. H. Dicke, Phys. Rev. 93, 99 (1954).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    See papers and references in Cooperative Effects in Matter and Radiation, edited by C. M. Bowden, D. W. Howgate and H. R. Robl, Plenum, New York, 1977.Google Scholar
  4. 4. (a)
    C. M. Bowden and C. C. Sung, Phys. Rev. A18, 1558 (1978).Google Scholar
  5. 4. (b)
    Phys. Rev. A20, 2033 (1979).Google Scholar
  6. 5.
    F. P. Mattar and C. M. Bowden, “Coherent Pump Dynamics, Propagation, Transverse and Diffraction Effects in Three-level Superfluorescence and Control of Light by Light”, Phys. Rev. A, January 1983, (to be published).Google Scholar
  7. 6.
    C. M. Bowden and C-. C. Sung, “Initiation of Superfluorescence in Coherently-pumped Three-level Systems”, Phys. Rev. Lett., January 1983, (to be published).Google Scholar
  8. 7.
    H. M. Gibbs, NATO Advanced Study Institute on “Superfluorescence Experiments”, in Coherence in Spectroscopy and Modern Physics, edited by F. T. Arecchi, R. Bonifacio and M. 0. Scully, Plenum, New York, 1978, p. 121.Google Scholar
  9. 8.
    M. S. Feld and J. C. MacGillivray, “Superradiance”, in Coherent Nonlinear Optics, edited by M. S. Feld and V. S. Letokhov; Topics in Current Physics, Springer-Verlag, Volume 21, 1980, p. 7.Google Scholar
  10. 9.
    Q. H. F. Vrehen and H. M. Gibbs, “Superfluorescence Experiments”, in Dissipative Systems in Quantum Optics, edited by R. Bonifacio; Topics in Current Physics, Springer-Verlag, Volume 27, 1982, p. 111.Google Scholar
  11. 10.
    D. Polder, M. F. H. Schuurmans and Q. H. F. Vrehen, Phys. Rev. A19, 1192 (1979).Google Scholar
  12. 11.
    M. F. H. Schuurmans, Q. H. F. Vrehen, D. Polder, and H. M. Gibbs, “Superfluorescence”, in Advances in Atomic and Molecular Physics, edited by D. Bates and B. Bederson, Volume 17, Academic Press, 1981, p. 167.Google Scholar
  13. 12.
    R. J. Glauber and F. Haake, Phys. Lett. A68, 29 (1978); Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 558 (1980); F. Haake, H. King, G. Schrőder and J. Haus, Phys. Rev. A20, 2047 (1979).Google Scholar
  14. 13.
    R. J. Glauber, Phys. Rev. 130, 2529 (1963); 131, 2766 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 14.
    L. Allen and J. H. Eberly, Optical Resonance and Two-level Atoms, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1975, p. 54.Google Scholar
  16. 15.
    C. C. Sung and C. M. Bowden, to be published.Google Scholar
  17. 16.
    The slice averaged atomic operators Rkℓ are obtained by averaging operators Rkol (j), appearing in (2-1), over a slice of the medium containing many atoms but yet thin in the z direction compared to an atomic transition wavelength. Specifically, \(R_{k\ell } (z,t) = \frac{l}{{\eta _S }}\sum\limits_{j\varepsilon \{ j\} _{\rm Z} } {R_{k\ell }^{(j)} (t)}\), where ns is the mean number of atoms in z a slice and (j) zdenotes the collection of atomsin z-d/2 < zj < z + d/2, d/2 π λ < < 1. The procedure is presented explicitly in reference 10. \(\overline R _{k\ell }\) is then the rightward propagating collective atomic variable.Google Scholar
  18. 17.
    F. P. Mattar and M. C. Newstein, Reference 3, p. 139; F. P. Mattar, in Optical Bistability, edited by C. M. Bowden, M. Ciftan and H. R. Robl, Plenum, New York, 1981, p. 503; in Proceedings, Tenth Simulation and Modeling Conference, Pittsburgh, 1978, edited by W. Vogt and M. Mickle, (Pub. Inst. Soc. Am., Pittsburgh, PA, 1979).Google Scholar
  19. 18.
    The “tipping angle” determined in the appendix of reference 5 was chosen in a different manner than that outlined here, but essentially amounts to the same procedure as far as the computational results are concerned, although it is not as straightforward.Google Scholar
  20. 19.
    F. P. Mattar, C. M. Bowden and C. C. Sung, to be published.Google Scholar
  21. 20.
    R. Friedberg and S. R. Hartmann, Phys. Rev. A13, 495 (1976).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charles M. Bowden
    • 1
  1. 1.Research DirectórateUS Army Missile Laboratory US Army Missile CommandRedstone ArsenalUSA

Personalised recommendations