Random dynamics

  • H. B. Nielsen
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Physics book series (LNP, volume 181)


Gauge Group Gauge Transformation Conjugacy Class Gauge Invariance Bianchi Identity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1).
    J.A. Wheeler, Physics and Austerity: Law without Law, Working paper Center of Theoretical Physics, University of Texas (1982); J.A. Wheeler, Beyond the Black Hole, Copyright © 1979 by John Archibald Wheeler, Center for Theoretical Physics, The University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
  2. 1a).
    C.H. Woo, Mission Impossible? A look at Past Setbacks in the Search for Elementary Matter and for Universal Symmetries, Zentrum für Interdisziplinare Forschung, Univ. Bielefeld (W-Germany) preprint.Google Scholar
  3. 1b).
    R.P. Feynman, The Character of Physical Law (The M.I.T. Press, 1967).Google Scholar
  4. 1c).
    G.F. Chew, see for example Quark or Bootstrap: Triumph or Frustration for Hadron Physics? Proceedings of the ninth Course of the International School of Subnuclear Physics “E. Majorana”, Properties of the Fundamental Interactions, Erice, July 8–26, 1971 — Edited by A. Zichichi — Published by Editrice Compositori, Bologna, Italy, 1973, or F. Chew, Hadron bootstrap triumph or frustration? Physics Today, October 1970 Vol. 23 no. 10, p. 23.Google Scholar
  5. 1d).
    S. Cuilli, Analytic Continuation and Prediction Theory, Part of an invited lecture and the closing address at the International Conference on Inverse Problems (Montpellier 1975) and of some lectures given in 1977 at Bern and in 1980 at Trinity College Dublin.Google Scholar
  6. 2).
    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38 (1977) 1440; Phys. Rev. D16 (1977)1791; S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40 (1978)223; F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40 (1978)279.Google Scholar
  7. 3).
    N. Brene, H.B. Nielsen, Why the Standard Model Group should have a Connected Center, Niels Bohr Institute preprint NBI-HE-82-29.Google Scholar
  8. 4).
    H.B. Nielsen, “Fundamentals of Quark Models”, Eds. J.M. Barbour and A.T. Davies (Univ. of Glascow, 1977) p. 528.Google Scholar
  9. 5).
    H.B. Nielsen, “Particle Physics 1980”, Eds.I. Andric, I. Dadic and N. Zovkor (North Holland, 1981) p. 125.Google Scholar
  10. 6).
    H.B. Nielsen, Har vi brug for fundamentale naturlove? (Do we need fundamental laws of nature?), Gamma 36, p. 3 & Gamma 37, p. 35–46 (1978) (ed. at the Niels Bohr Institute).Google Scholar
  11. 6a).
    S. Chadha and H.B. Nielsen, Lorentz Invariance as a Low Energy Phenomenon, Niels Bohr Institute preprint HBI-HE-82-42.Google Scholar
  12. 7).
    D. Förster, H.B. Nielsen & M. Ninomiya, Phys. Lett. 94B (1980) 135; S. Shenker, an unpublished research report.Google Scholar
  13. 8).
    C.D. Froggatt and H.B. Nielsen, Nucl. Phys. B147 (1979) 277.Google Scholar
  14. 9).
    C.D. Froggatt and H.B. Nielsen, Nucl. Phys. B164 (1979) 114.Google Scholar
  15. 10).
    A shorter version of ref. 9) also mentioning a work by N. Brene (H. Bohr and myself) is in: Proc. Neutrino-79, Internat. Conf. on Neutrinos, Weak Interactions and Cosmology, Bergen, June 18–22,1979, vol. I, A. Haatuft and C. Jarlskog (eds.) (Astvedt Industrier A/S) 320.Google Scholar
  16. 11).
    M. Lehto, H.B. Nielsen and M. Ninomiya, Phys. Lett. 115B p. 129 (1982).Google Scholar
  17. 12).
    H.B. Nielsen and M. Ninomiya, Nucl. Phys. B141 (1979) 153.Google Scholar
  18. 13).
    H.B. Nielsen and I. Picek, Phys. Lett. 114B (1982) p. 141.Google Scholar
  19. 14).
    H.B. Nielsen and I. Picek, Lorentz non-invariance, Niels Bohr Institute preprint NBI-HE-82-30 (1982).Google Scholar
  20. 15).
    H.P. Dürr, “Heisenberg's einheitliche Feldtheorie der Elementarteilchen” in Heisenberg Gedenkbuch 1981, Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina.Google Scholar
  21. 16).
    R. Peccei, these proceedings.Google Scholar
  22. 17).
    E.A. Ivanov and V.I. Ogievietsky, Pisma Zh. Eksp. Theor. Fiz. 23 (1976) 661.Google Scholar
  23. 18).
    E. Fradkin and S.H. Shenker, Phys. Rev. D19 (1979) 3682.Google Scholar
  24. 19).
    T. Banks and L. Rabinovici, Nucl. Phys. B160 (1979) 349.Google Scholar
  25. 20).
    M. Veltman, The infrared-ultraviolet connection, Acta Phys. Pol. B Vol. B12 No. 5 p. 437–57 (May 1981), and talk given at the Hamburg meeting (1978).Google Scholar
  26. 21).
    J. Iliopoulos, D.V. Nanopoulos and T.N. Tamaros, Phys. Lett. 94B (1980) 141. See also J. Iliopoulos, “Unification” in Particle Physics 1980, I. Andric, I. Dadic and N. Zovko (eds.) c 1981, North Holland Publishing Company. (The gauge symmetry explanation is on page 25 of the article beginning on page 1.)Google Scholar
  27. 22).
    T. Regge, Nuovo Cimento 19 (1961) 558.Google Scholar
  28. 23).
    R.M. Williams and M. Rocek, Phys. Lett. 104B, p. 31 (1981) and Calt-68-818 DOE Research and Development Report.Google Scholar
  29. 24).
    A.M. Polyakov, Phys. Lett. 103B (1981) 207.Google Scholar
  30. 25).
    L. Gross, Decay of Correlations in Classical Lattice Models at High Temperature, Commun. Math. Phys. 68, p. 9–27 (1979).Google Scholar
  31. 26).
    R. Jackiw, these proceedings. S. Deser, R. Jackiw and S. Templeton, Annals of Physics 140 (1982) 372.Google Scholar
  32. 27).
    N.K. Nielsen, Nordita preprint and Nucl. Phys. B G.t'Hooft, Nucl. Phys. B62 (1973) 444Google Scholar
  33. 27a).
    P.B. Gilkey, Proc. Symp. Pure Math. 27 (1975) 265Google Scholar
  34. 27b).
    , J. Differential Geometry 10 (1975) 1975.Google Scholar
  35. 28).
    S. Weinberg in The second Workshop on Grand Unification, ed. J.P. Leveille, L.R. Sulak and D.G. Unger (Birkhäuser 1981), Phys. Rev. D26 (1982) 287.Google Scholar
  36. 29).
    L. Michel, Invariance in Quantum Mechanics; Group Theoretical Concepts and Methods in Elementary Particle Physics, Lectures at the Istanbul Summer School of Theoretical Physics, July 16 — August 4, 1962, Ed. by Feza Gürsev, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey, New York Gordon and Breach, 1964.Google Scholar
  37. 30).
    H. Georgi, B.L. Glashow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 32, 438 (1974).Google Scholar
  38. 31).
    See for example: Zou Zhenlong, Huang Peng et al. Some Research on Gauge Theories of Gravitation, Scientia Sinica Vol XXII No. 6 June 1979, p. 628.Google Scholar
  39. 32).
    See e.g. D.Z. Freedman and P.K. Townsend, Nucl. Phys. B177 (1981), 282–296, and N. Obukhov, Phys. Lett. 109B no. 3,p. 195, 18 Feb. 1982.Google Scholar
  40. 33).
    R. Pearson, Phase structure of antisymmetric tensor gauge fields, NSF-ITP-81-33 a preprint from Institute of Theoretical Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106 (1981).Google Scholar
  41. 34).
    A. Brillet and J.L. Hall, Improved Laser Test of the Isotropy of Space, Phys. Rev. Lett. number 9, p. 549 (1979).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Verlag 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. B. Nielsen
    • 1
  1. 1.Niels Bohr Institutet and NORDITAKøbenhavn øDanmark

Personalised recommendations