Advertisement

Analytic tools for human factors of software

  • Phyllis Reisner
Various Aspects Of The Human Factors Problem
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 150)

Abstract

Behavioral experiments are currently the primary method of assessing the human factors of end user systems. Such experiments, however, are time consuming and sometimes come too late in the development cycle to influence ease of use. Analytic tools, which involve an abstract representation of a user interface and some manipulation of that representation to predict ease of use, are potentially faster. They can also be more intellectually satisfying. This paper gives examples of some analytic tools currently being developed and discusses the motivation and state of the art of such tools.

Keywords

Analytic Tool Human Factor Language Model Noun Phrase Behavioral Experiment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bleser, T. & Foley, J. D., Toward specifying and evaluating the human factors of user-computer interfaces, Proc. Human Factors in Computer Systems, Gaithersburg, Md., 1982, 309–314.Google Scholar
  2. Card, S. K. & Moran, T. P., The keystroke-level model for user performance time with interactive systems, Comm. ACM, 1980, 23, 396–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dunsmore, H. E., Using formal grammar as a design tool to predict the most useful characteristics of interactive systems, Office Automation Conference Digest, San Francisco: AFIPS Press, 1982a, 53–56.Google Scholar
  4. Dunsmore, H. E., & Reisner, P., Some further evidence on the formal grammar approach to human factors research, Technical Report 348, Dept. of Computer Sciences, Purdue University, 1982b.Google Scholar
  5. Embley, D. W., Lan, N. T. Leinbaugh, D. W. & Nagy, G., A procedure for predicting program editor performance from the users point of view, Intl. J. of Man-Machine Studies, 1978, 10, 639–650.Google Scholar
  6. Farrand, A. B., Keystrokes and cognition: an experimental comparison, in preparation. Google Scholar
  7. Foley, J. D. & van Dam, A., Fundamentals of Computer Graphics, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1982.Google Scholar
  8. Jacob, R. J. K., Using formal specification in the design of a human-computer interface, Proc. Human Factors in Computer Systems, Gaithersburg, Md., 1982, 315–321.Google Scholar
  9. Kieras, D. E., & Polson, P. G., An approach to the formal analysis of user complexity, Project on the user complexity of devices and systems, Working Paper No. 2, University of Arizona and University of Colorado, 1982.Google Scholar
  10. Moran, T. P., The command language grammar: a representation for the user interface of interactive computer systems, Intl. J. of Man-Machine Studies, 1981, 15, 3–50.Google Scholar
  11. The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction, special issue of ACM Computing Surveys, (Moran, T. ed), 1981, 13. Google Scholar
  12. Reisner, P., Formal grammar and human factors design of an interactive graphics system, IEEE Trans. on Software Engineering, 1981a, SE-7, 229–240.Google Scholar
  13. Reisner, P., Human factors studies of database query languages: a survey and assessment, ACM Computing Surveys, 1981b, 13, 13–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Reisner, P., Formal grammar as a tool for analyzing ease of use: some fundamental concepts, Human Factors in Computer Systems, (Thomas, J. and Schneider, M. eds), Ablex, in pressGoogle Scholar
  15. Shneiderman, B., Software Psychology, Winthrop, Cambridge, Mass, 1980.Google Scholar
  16. Shneiderman, B., Multiparty grammars and related features for defining interactive systems, IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 1982, SMC-12, 148–154.Google Scholar
  17. Todd, M. personal communication.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Phyllis Reisner
    • 1
  1. 1.IBM Research LaboratorySan Jose

Personalised recommendations