# Second quantization of directly interacting particles

Conference paper

First Online:

## Keywords

Free Particle Mass Shell Mass Operator Particle Creation Predictive Mechanic
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## References

- 1).W. Heisenberg, Z. Phys. 120,513 (1943).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2).Ph. Droz-Vincent, Lett. Nuovo Cimento, 1,800 (1971); Reports Math. Phys. 8,79(1975); Phys. Rev. D 19.702 1979). L. Bel in Differential Geometry an elativity, Volume in the honor of A. Lichnerowicz, M. Cahen and M. Flato Editors, or rec. (1977).Google Scholar
- 3).In spite of well-known difficulties related with negative energy solutions the Gordon current offers at least the advantage of having something to do with the probability density at the non relativistic limit.Google Scholar
- 4).M. Gelfand and N. Ya. Vilenkin, Generalized functions 4, Applications of Harmonic Analysis, New York Academic Press, 1964.Google Scholar
- 5).Ph. Droz-Vincent, Il Nuovo Cimento, vol. 58 A, nº 4, 355 (1980).Google Scholar
- 6).L. Horwitz and F. Rohrlich, Preprint, Syracuse 1981. In order to attach a definite mass with the wave function these authors have introduced a mass term in the time dependent Schrödinger equations. This term puts a phase factor in the evolution operator but gives no contribution to S-matrix calculations. In the constraint formalism it may occur that the constraint operators do not commute strongly. In that case L
^{2}is replaced by a subspace in which their commutators vanish. Within this reduced space the situation is algebraically similar to the one we consider.Google Scholar - 7).Ph. Droz-Vincent, Physica Scripta 2,129 (1970).Google Scholar
- 8).For the needs of a physicist we recommand an introduction to the subject in Bogoliubov, Logunov and Todorov. Introduction to Quantum Field Theory, Benjamin Reading Mass. (1975) Chap I 4,5,6 p. 32 et seq. For the sake of simplicity and convenience we introduce hermiticity in the rigged Hilbert space with the implicit assumption that the domains of the operators include & A more accurate and general treatment would involve the concept of self-adointness in the rigged Hilbert space in the sense of the above reference. The existence of realistic interacting hamiltonians which map & into itself is by no means obvious. In fact, the way we rig L
^{2}(R^{4N})might be too restrictive for practical purposes. For instance an alternative choice*D*⊂ L^{2}⊂*D*^{*}(where*D*is the space of C^{∞}functions with compact support) would perhaps give us more freedom. But & behaves more simply than*D*under Fourier transformation. Anyway, for the simplicity of the discussion we choose & the nuclear subspace in the present picture. This choice could be modified if necessary.Google Scholar - 9).The parameters are related with the affine parameters when the hamiltonians are identified as half-squared masses. The law of this reparametrization is given in Ph. Droz-Vincent, Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré XXVII n24, 407(1977).Google Scholar
- 10).The concept of interacting mass-shell has been widely used at the classical level by I.T. Todorov, Commun. of the JINR,EZ-10125, Dubna (1975). V.V. Molotkov and I.T. Todorov, Comm. Math. Phys. 79,111(1981).Google Scholar
- 11).Unfortunately the stability of the positive energy subspace \(K_{m_1 ...m_N }^{N( + )}\)(respectivelyK
_{m}^{(-)}is another story.Google Scholar - 12).On the subject of scattering quantum theory, seeGoogle Scholar
- 12a).F. Coester, Helv. Phys. Acta 38 7 (1965), “Canonical Scattering theory for Relativistic panicles”, presented at the “Conference on Mathematical Methods and Applications of Scattering Theory”, 21–25 May 1979, Catholic University Washington D.C., and Argonne preprint.Google Scholar
- 12b).L.-P. Horwitz and A. Soffer, Helv. Phys. Acta 53,112(1980).Google Scholar
- 12c).L.P. Horwitz and F. Rohrlich, Ref. 6. On the subject of predictive N-body systemsGoogle Scholar
- 12d).Ph. Droz-Vincent, Ann. Inst. H. Poincare, XXXII, nº4,377 (1980).Google Scholar
- 12e).V. Iranzo, J. Llosa, F. Marques, A. Molina, Barcelona University preprint, UBFT-21-80 (Octobre 1980) to appear in Ann. Inst. H. Poincare.Google Scholar
- 12f).L. Bel and X. Fustero, Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré 25,411 (1976). On N-body systems and separability, seeGoogle Scholar
- 12g).F. Rohrlich, Phys. Rev. D 23, nº6 1305 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12h).H. Sazdjian Orsay pre rintIPNO/TH 30-38 (Sept. 1980) and IPNO/ TH 81-4 (Janv. 1981).Google Scholar
- 12i).L. Lusanna Syracuse University preprint COO-35 33-182 (Déc. 1980). Geneva University preprint UOVI-DPT 04-289 (1981).Google Scholar
- 12j).J. Gomis J.A. Lobo and J.M. Pons, Barcelona University preprint (19805.Google Scholar
- 13).Ph. Droz-Vincent, Lett. Nuovo Cimento 28, no. 5(1980). In this short note we announced shortly the matter developed here.Google Scholar
- 14).L. Bel, A. Sales, J.M. Sánchez Phys. Rev. 2,1099 (1973).Google Scholar
- 14a).L. Bel, J. Martin, ibid 8,4347 (1973).Google Scholar
- 15).A.S. Wightman, Phys. Rev. 101,860 (1956).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16).A short review of this matter is given in Bogolubov, Logunov, Todorov, Op. Cit. Chap. 11 p. 287 (1975).Google Scholar
- 17).The definition of the action of the Poincare group in Λ*is straight forward: see Ref. [16]. As usually we have: \(\mathcal{N}\Psi = (0,\psi _4 ,2\psi _2 ,...N\psi _N ,...)\)but Ψ is not restricted to the mass-shell.Google Scholar
- 18).Ph. Droz-Vincent, C.R. Aced. Sc. Paris, I, t.292, ng 16,761(1981).Google Scholar

## Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1982