Advertisement

Spontaneous predictivisation

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Physics book series (LNP, volume 162)

Abstract

In the first section of this paper we define the concept of an Attractor of a hereditary first order differential equation as an ordinary differential equation whose solutions are solutions of the hereditary one and can be interpreted as the asymptotes of its generic solutions. We define also the concept of Predictive Differential Equations associated with a class of hereditary ones depending on a coupling constant G as a first order differential equation which is such that all its solutions are solutions of the corresponding hereditary one and which is analytic in the neighbourhood of G = 0. We report some numerical work proving that for some hereditary equations the corresponding predictive ones are Attractors.

In the second section we consider the retarded electromagnetic equations of two point charges and we prove numerically in a particular case that the associate Predictive Poincaré Invariant System defined in previous papers is an Attractor in an obviously generalized sense. Roughly speaking this means that the retarded electromagnetic equations of motion have a built-in mechanism which causes a spontaneous predictivisation of the causal interaction.

Keywords

Physical Review Order Differential Equation World Line Causal Interaction Neutral Type 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1).
    R. Bellman and K.L. Cooke. Differential-Difference Equations. Academic Press, 1963Google Scholar
  2. 2).
    L.E. El'sgol'ts and S.B. Norkin. Introduction to the Theory and Application of Differential Equations with Deviating Arguments. Academic Press, 1973.Google Scholar
  3. 3).
    R.D. Driver. Ordinary and Delay Differential Equations. Springer-Verlag, 1977.Google Scholar
  4. 4).
    L. Landau and E. Lifshitz. The Classical Theory of Fields. Addison-Wesley Press, 1951.Google Scholar
  5. 5).
    E. Kerner. Journal of Mathematical Physics 6,1218 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6).
    J.L. Sanz. Tesis Universided Autónoma de Madrid (1976).Google Scholar
  7. 7).
    J.L. Sanz. Journal of Math. Physics 20,2334 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8).
    L. Bel and X. Fustero. Annales de l'Intitut H. Poincaré 25,411 (1976).Google Scholar
  9. 9).
    M. Portilla. Journal of Physics A, 12,1075 (1979).Google Scholar
  10. 10).
    L. Bel, Th. Damour, N. Deruelle, J. Ibañez and J. Martin. To be published in General Relativity and Gravitation.Google Scholar
  11. 11).
    D.G. Currie. Physical Review, 142,817 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12).
    R.N. Hill. Journal of Mathematical Physics 8,201 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13).
    L. Bel. Annales de l'Institut H. Poincaré, 12,307 (1970).Google Scholar
  14. 14).
    L. Bel. Lecciones de Mecánica Relativista Predictive. Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona (1976).Google Scholar
  15. 15).
    L. Bel and J. Martin. Annales de l'Institut H. Poincaré, 33,409 (1980).Google Scholar
  16. 16).
    Droz-Vincent. Physica Scripta 2,129 (1970).Google Scholar
  17. 17).
    H.P. Kunzle. Journal of Mathematical Physics 15,1033 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18).
    A. Salas and J.M. Sánchez-Rón. Il Nuovo Cimento 20B,209 (1974).Google Scholar
  19. 19).
    L. Bel. Journées Relativistes de Toulouse, Université de Toulouse (1974).Google Scholar
  20. 20).
    R. Lapiedra and A. Molina. Journal of Mathematical Physics 20,1308 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21).
    J.C. Kasher and S.L. Schwebel. Physical Review D4,2956 (1971)Google Scholar
  22. 22).
    C.M. Andersen and Hans C. von Bayer. Physical Review D5,2470 (1972).Google Scholar
  23. 23).
    J. Huschilt, W.E. Baylis, D. Leiter and G. Szamosi. Physical Review D7,2844 (1973).Google Scholar
  24. 24).
    J. Huschilt and W.E. Baylis. Physical Review D13,3256 (1976).Google Scholar
  25. 25).
    W.E. Baylis and J. Huschilt. Physical Review D13,3262 (1976).Google Scholar
  26. 26).
    In the meantime between the workshop and the publication of these proceedings, that conjecture has been proved.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. Bel
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut Henri Poincaré - 11Equipe de Recherche Associée au C.N.R.S. n° 533ParisFrance

Personalised recommendations