Advertisement

Principles of database conceptual design

  • John Miles Smith
  • Diane C. P. Smith
Part 2. Logical Data Base Design
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 132)

Abstract

Criteria and methodologies for the conceptual design of databases, particularly in large and sophisticated applications, are addressed. For a design to be understandable to user and designer alike, intuitive methods for abstracting concepts from a mass of detail must be employed. Two abstraction methods are particularly important — aggregation and generalization. Aggregation forms a concept by abstracting a relationship between other concepts (called components). Generalization forms a concept by abstracting a class of other concepts (called categories). The principle of "object relativity" is essential for the successful integration of abstractions. This principle states that individuals, categories, relationships and components are just different ways of viewing the same abstract objects. Using this principle a design may be hierarchically organized into independently meaningful abstractions. An "abstract syntax" is introduced to specify these abstraction hierarchies. An advantage of this abstract syntax is that some concepts do not have to be arbitrarily classified as "roles". The principle of "individual preservation" is a minimal requirement for maintaining the semantics of aggregation and generalization. It states that every user-invokeable operation must preserve the integrity of individuals. A methodology for designing an abstract syntax specification is outlined. The simplicity of this methodology is directly due to the principles of object relativity and individual preservation.

CR Categories

3.65 3.70 4.22 4.33 4.34 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

8. References

  1. [1]
    Codd, E.F., A relational model of data for large shared data banks. Comm. ACM 13, 6 (June 1970), 377–387.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Liskov, B. and Zilles, S., Programming with abstract data types. Proc. of a Symposium on Very High Level Languages, SIGPLAN Notices 9, 4, April 1974.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    McCarthy, J., Towards a mathematical science of computation. Proc. IFIP Cong. 1962, North-Holland Pub. Co., Amsterdam, 1962.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Mylopoulos, J., Bernstein, P. and Wong, H.K.T., A preliminary report on TAXIS: A language for interactive information systems design. Computer Corporation of America Report CCA-77-10, Dec. 1977.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Smith, J.M., and Smith, D.C.P., Database abstractions: aggregation. Comm. ACM 20, 6 (June 1977), 405–413.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Smith, J.M., and Smith, D.C.P., Database abstractions: aggregation and generalization. ACM Trans. on Database Syst. 2, 2 (June 1977), 105–133.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Smith, J.M., and Smith, D.C.P., Integrated specifications for abstract systems. University of Utah, Computer Science Dept. Report UUCC-77-112, (Sept. 1977). To appear in IEEE Trans. on Software Engineering.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Wong, H.K.T. and Mylopoulos, J., Two views of data semantics: A survey of data models in artificial intelligence and data management. INFOR 15, 3, Oct. 1977.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Yormark, B., The ANSI/X3/SPARC/SGDBMS Architecture. In The ANSI/SPARC DBMS Model (D.A. Jardine Editor), North-Holland Publishing Co., New York, 1977.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Miles Smith
    • 1
  • Diane C. P. Smith
    • 1
  1. 1.Computer Corporation of AmericaCambridge

Personalised recommendations